Channel
@HongKongStatePublicMeeting
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001182786833 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HongKongStatePublicMeeting |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 25 April 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HongKongStatePublicMeeting |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 9 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 9 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 April 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 October 2020. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
《致同路人的勒索信》 Uber救護車作為云云抗爭者中的一個Nobody。 即使未來我們可能無法以後勤頻道的名義服務各位手足，但我們只是改頭換面，本團隊會用另一個角色身份繼續向光復香港的共同願景前進。 但開風氣不為師，不論我們的勒索成功與否，希望一眾尊貴的議員以及從政的同路人會以我們的決定作為警惕，切忌留戀光環，在必要時用盡任何方式繼續為香港民族自由而犧牲的手足抗爭下去。 I am Nobody, We are Nobody, Nobody, I don’t know. 👇🏻👇🏻訂閱Patreon，解鎖光復我城計劃進度 👇🏻👇🏻 https://www.patreon.com/hkua 請另外使用瀏覽器開啟 #記得睇到最後 #請分享比每一個仲堅持緊嘅手足 #SUPPORT_HKUA #最後一戰Patreon5000 ——————————————— Facebook https://www.facebook.com/wat…
Happy birthday United States of America! 香港國喺香港向各位美國人問好！ 我非常慶幸香港人仲可以有機會同美國慶祝國慶，武漢肺炎持續全球肆虐，對於美國不能如往年一樣都有國慶節遊行、去沙灘慶祝、街外搶睇煙火最佳位置感到非常遺憾。 每年嘅7月4號，美國人同親朋好友歡聚一堂，弘揚二百幾年前激勵美國人先輩建國嘅價值理念，例如包括：生命、自由同對幸福嘅追求(All men are created equal)呢啲自由並非美國人所特有。 佢哋嘅價值理念仲體現咗喺好多國家嘅憲法之中，並且寫入得到我哋所有人都承認嘅《世界人權宣言》中。因此，今日美國獨立日(U.S. Independence Day)亦都係我哋全人類、我哋香港人值得共同慶祝嘅慶典。 但係今天亦都係美國一個特殊嘅日子，我香港國對於我哋仲能夠一齊紀念呢個日子感到高興，因為各地嘅美國人，特別係幫助我哋香港嘅外交使團、美國嘅外交人員同埋數之…
#手動轉載 #手足投稿 【521香港獨立宣言】集合所有人力量 今晚九點前我要所有人睇過！ https://lih.kg/2027177 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區 《五二一香港獨立宣言》 序文： 反修例抗爭已經持續將近一年，香港人由當初要求撤回送中條例，演變成爭取五大訴求，但特區政府不但開始警暴，更濫捕濫殺抗爭者。香港的核心價值，如法治，言論自由，集會遊行自由等日復日被港府蠶食。“一國兩制，高度自治，港人治港”名存實亡，香港回歸後的蜜月期正式宣告結束，“一國一制”步步進逼，各種猙獰的醜態喚醒了過百萬港人。 前言： 甘心當中國共產黨傀儡的港府，在近來強推《國歌條例草案》，基本法23條的威脅一直離我們不遠。當法庭和立法會甚至執法部門都淪為政府的棋子，人民逐漸醒覺，在制度裡的角力根本徒勞無功，只有擁抱香港獨立的理念，才有可能建立真正為民所有，為民所治，為民所享的政府。雖然我們曾經把香港獨立當為天方夜譚，但當走上街頭的聲…
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] c.c.: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], i…
本屆議會為香港國第一屆大眾議會，其號召原因一共有一項重要決議——編寫《香港國民指南》； 懇請各與會者集中討論有關決議及議案。 議會規則——任何行為不檢或看來相當可能有不檢行為的大眾人士警告三次無效將會驅離會場，懇請各與會者尊重及遵從議會。 ------------------------------ 有關編製《香港國民指南》 本指南目的： 為了香港國國民能有效運用自身之能力，貢獻建國革命，本指南循過去抗爭運動之中汲取失敗經驗並分析固中原因，為國民提供不同情況中的最佳實用建議，以減低國民戰力因低級錯誤而損耗。 ------------------------------ 我哋暫時定咗份指南會就以下幾個範疇列出建議，懇請各與會者集中討論。 1. 網路/電子裝置保安 🔴 必須 🟠 重要 🟡 一般 🟢 建議 <<網路通訊安全指引>> （一）提防截取通訊和洩漏私隱 🔴 不要使用任何中國品牌或與中共友好品牌的通訊工…
本屆議會為香港國第一屆大眾議會，其號召原因一共有一項重要決議——編寫《香港國民指南》； 懇請各與會者集中討論有關決議及議案。 議會規則——任何行為不檢或看來相當可能有不檢行為的大眾人士警告三次無效將會驅離會場，懇請各與會者尊重及遵從議會。 ------------------------------ 有關編製《香港國民指南》 本指南目的： 為了香港國國民能有效運用自身之能力，貢獻建國革命，本指南循過去抗爭運動之中汲取失敗經驗並分析固中原因，為國民提供不同情況中的最佳實用建議，以減低國民戰力因低級錯誤而損耗。 ------------------------------ 我哋暫時定咗份指南會就以下幾個範疇列出建議，懇請各與會者集中討論。 1. 網路/電子裝置保安 🔴 必須 🟠 重要 🟡 一般 🟢 建議 <<網路通訊安全指引>> （一）提防截取通訊和洩漏私隱 🔴 不要使用任何中國品牌或與中共友好品牌的通訊工…
本屆議會為香港國第一屆大眾議會，其號召原因一共有一項重要決議——編寫《香港國民指南》； 懇請各與會者集中討論有關決議及議案。 議會規則——任何行為不檢或看來相當可能有不檢行為的大眾人士警告三次無效將會驅離會場，懇請各與會者尊重及遵從議會。 ------------------------------ 有關編製《香港國民指南》 本指南目的： 為了香港國國民能有效運用自身之能力，貢獻建國革命，本指南循過去抗爭運動之中汲取失敗經驗並分析固中原因，為國民提供不同情況中的最佳實用建議，以減低國民戰力因低級錯誤而損耗。 ------------------------------ 我哋暫時定咗份指南會就以下幾個範疇列出建議，懇請各與會者集中討論。 1. 網路/電子裝置保安 2. 組織保安 3. 戰術 - 陣地戰術（單人/小隊） - 游擊戰術（單人/小隊） 4. 危機應變 - 被困陣地 - 被圍捕 - 突發被…
本屆議會為香港國第一屆大眾議會，其號召原因一共有一項重要決議——編寫《香港國民指南》； 懇請各與會者集中討論有關決議及議案。 議會規則——任何行為不檢或看來相當可能有不檢行為的大眾人士警告三次無效將會驅離會場，懇請各與會者尊重及遵從議會。 ------------------------------ 有關編製《香港國民指南》 本指南目的： 為了香港國國民能有效運用自身之能力，貢獻建國革命，本指南循過去抗爭運動之中汲取失敗經驗並分析固中原因，為國民提供不同情況中的最佳實用建議，以減低國民戰力因低級錯誤而損耗。 ------------------------------ 我哋暫時定咗份指南會就以下幾個範疇列出建議，懇請各與會者集中討論。 1. 網路/電子裝置保安 2. 組織保安 3. 戰術 - 陣地戰術（單人/小隊） - 游擊戰術（單人/小隊） 4. 危機應變 - 被困陣地 - 被圍捕 - 突發被…
#香港國大眾會議紀錄 有大眾提出： 今日（2020年4月26日）太古城有手足 穿著Blackbloc裝 建議《國民指南》要增加不同抗爭時期的衣著，以及說明每種服裝穿著的時機。
本屆議會議案包括： 編輯製作《香港國民指南》 議程： 指南編製方向； 拓展元素及延伸範疇。 目的： 令香港國民喺革命之中生存 —— 保安 電子資訊保安 - 網路通訊安全 - 安全瀏覽 - 敏感資料處理守則 - 斷網應變 組織保安 - 組織安全協定 - 資訊滲漏測試 - 風險管理 危機應變 戰術 資源運用 -投資回報率 -不要麻木大愛 -資源分配問題 -付出/投資方針 -定立長遠目標 -改變思考模式 -啟發資源使用可行性 -認證及信任度 戰鬥裝備 心態 例如： 【電子資訊保安】 不要使用任何中國品牌或與中共友好品牌的通訊工具，如 WeChat、Weibo、Facebook旗下平台（fb/ ig/ wts) 不要以上台號碼登記通訊工具 ***高風險行動應使用從未用過的電話和 Sim 卡 平日上網使用Brave瀏覽器 ***敏感網站使用 Tor 瀏…
#香港國大眾會議紀錄 社會狀況 黃 幫襯黃店 問題 麻木盲目光顧黃店 黃店 因政治立場得益 問題 資源豐富、成為己得利益者 手足 革命需要資助 問題 真正進行地下化革命手足資源缺乏 手足放棄革命 轉型做商人 結果 剩得黃色經濟圈
#香港國大眾會議紀錄 而家啲錢嘅flow係咁 手足 --幫襯--> 黃店 黃店 --捐助--> 手足 黃店 --交租--> 藍業主 黃店 --買貨--> 藍供應商 結果黃色經濟圈其實一部份錢係流咗去藍色商家，但黃店又唔見得吸納到幾多藍絲生意 最理想係 藍絲 --幫襯--> 黃店 --助養---> 手足
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @HongKongStatePublicMeeting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,351,898 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@HongKongStatePublicMeeting named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📋香港國大眾會議” (@HongKongStatePublicMeeting), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HongKongStatePublicMeeting.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.