Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for HIV/AIDS

Channel

HIV/AIDS

@HIV_AIDS_Fakten

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

80subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001460859628
TypeChannel
Username@HIV_AIDS_Fakten
DescriptionSammlung von Informationen über die AIDS-Lüge Weitere Kanäle: https://t.me/Ansteckungen https://t.me/Virus_kein_Isolat
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/HIV_AIDS_Fakten

Growth

807 August 2026 — 80 subscribers9 August 2026 — 80 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79–81 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 19:0280no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:0480first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 2 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.5%
avg views ÷ 80 subscribers
Avg views / post
18.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held19 (2 March 20255 August 2026)
Views total18
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
37
Videos
41
Links
161

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 22s
Average length
1m 04s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC18 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @LegitimNewsVideo

‼️Nobelpreisträger Dr. Kary Mullis ENTHÜLLT DEN AIDS-BETRUG. Der Mann, der die PCR erfand – genau jene Technologie, die die Pharmaindustrie und Regierungen später als Waffe einsetzten –, deckte dies noch vor seinem Tod auf‼️ Es gibt KEINERLEI wissenschaftlichen Beweis dafür, dass HIV AIDS verursacht. Keinen. Nicht eine einzige wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichung. Nicht eine einzige kontrollierte Studie. Dr. Mullis d

12 Feb 2026, 22:34 UTC116 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @corona_Impfschaden

https://youtu.be/ljZbBSQmPDI?si=1uzI-IcO7CDy4JKp

28 Jan 2026, 15:47 UTC129 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @NextLevelOriginal

🦠 Die Wahrheit über den Viren- und HIV-Betrug 🚨 Führende Forscher, Virologen und Nobelpreisträger bestätigen, was wir seit vielen Jahren aufdecken. 👉 Schaue jetzt das YouTube-Video: https://youtu.be/HXdDWSFbtgg Alle Zitate aus dem Video: 💬 Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos (Biophysikerin und Gründerin der Perth Group): „Fotos von Zellkulturen zu machen, beweist nicht, dass es sich um Viren handelt. [...] Was dort zu se

26 Jan 2026, 11:31 UTC91 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @NextLevelOriginal

🦠 HIV-Test: Kein gültiger Standard bis heute – warum schweigt die Medizin? 🤫 Da bis heute ein wissenschaftlicher Existenznachweis des HI-Virus (HIV) fehlt, existiert auch kein international anerkannter Standard für HIV-Tests – ein Umstand, der in den Packungsbeilagen (Quellen siehe unten) nachzulesen ist. Daraus resultiert das Problem, dass die Kriterien für ein positives Testergebnis wissenschaftlich nicht reproduz

25 Jan 2026, 20:23 UTC70 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @NextLevelOriginal

Die Allianz der Ratlosen: Wenn Fakten durch Framing ersetzt werden 1️⃣ Erst ignorieren sie dich, 2️⃣ dann lachen sie über dich, 3️⃣ dann bekämpfen sie dich 4️⃣ und dann gewinnst du. Mit NEXIQA sind wir jetzt offiziell an Punkt 3 angelangt. Wenn sich einer der bekanntesten „Wissenschafts-Kommunikatoren“ im deutschsprachigen Raum (Martin Moder), ein leitender Oberarzt (Dr. Hegedüs) und eine der größten Zeitungen Öst

25 Jan 2026, 20:06 UTC63 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @NextLevelOriginal

⚡️ Dr. Gelderblom vom RKI packt aus: HIV-Test basiert zu 80 % auf Dreck! Teil 1-3 unserer Reihe jetzt auf YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jS4-hGG_5Y Dr. Hans R. Gelderblom (ehem. Leiter der Elektronenmikroskopie am Robert Koch-Institut, 1998–2004) spricht im Video über die Probleme der HIV-Isolierung und die Interpretation von Elektronenmikroskopie-Bildern. Er berichtet, dass Isolate für den HIV-ELISA-Tes

27 Aug 2025, 06:19 UTC114 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @StefanLankaVideo

🔥Sucharit Bhakdi stimmt Stefan Lanka zu: HIV wurde nie isoliert! https://youtu.be/8sYdScfdBuk?si=IqfrrtEAvmkpRCV-&t=2014 t.me/StefanLanka

16 Jul 2025, 21:56 UTC162 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @impfen_nein_dankePhoto

"Während all der Jahre der Virustheorie der Krankheitsursache gab es nie einen Laborbeweis dafür, dass ein sogenanntes Virus überhaupt etwas verursachen kann oder tatsächlich verursacht. Dieses Konzept wurde uns seit fast 100 Jahren vom Pharma- und Medizinkartell aufgezwungen. Als sich herausstellte, dass Pasteurs Infektionstheorie der Krankheitsursache nicht stichhaltig war, da sie keine einzige Bedingung der Kochsc

16 Jul 2025, 21:56 UTC119 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @impfen_nein_dankeFile

Weiterführend: https://impfen-nein-danke.de/aids-hiv/ https://impfen-nein-danke.de/downloads2/3/#aidspdf

16 Jul 2025, 21:55 UTC107 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @impfen_nein_danke

Kochs Postulate sollten die wissenschaftliche Grundlage für den Zusammenhang zwischen Mikroben und Krankheiten schaffen. Diese Grundlage scheiterte. Die Keimtheorie [dt. meist Infektionstheorie] konnte die Postulate nicht erfüllen – daher wurde das Virus erfunden, um die Postulate zu umgehen und die Illusion aufrechtzuerhalten. Die HIV/AIDS-Falschmeldung war meine erste Begegnung mit dem Betrug der Keimtheorie und d

16 Jul 2025, 21:55 UTC94 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ViroLIEgyPhoto

Koch’s Postulates were meant to establish a scientific foundation for linking microbes to disease. That foundation failed. The germ "theory" couldn’t satisfy the postulates—so the “virus” was invented to bypass the postulates and preserve the illusion. The HIV/AIDS hoax was my introduction to the fraud of germ “theory” and virology. T.C. Fry’s The Great AIDS Hoax is a great resource for those beginning to understan

6 Jul 2025, 05:53 UTC73 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @NeueMedizinBibliothekVideo

#Lableak #Virenhypothese Damals wie heute Die Laborthese führt in die Sackgasse und dient der Spaltung und Selbstbeschäftigung, während die Verfahrensweise der Virologen, wie es zur Behauptung eines neuen Virus oder einer Mutante kommt, nicht beleuchtet und kritisch hinterfragt wird. Und ist die heutige Lableak-These plausibel? 👉https://neuemedizinbibliothek.substack.com/p/ist-ein-viren-laborleck-plausibel 👉Videol

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @HIV_AIDS_Fakten. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HIV/AIDS” (@HIV_AIDS_Fakten), 80 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HIV_AIDS_Fakten.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.