Channel
@StefanLanka
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,463subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002011114689 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @StefanLanka |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/StefanLanka |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 2,463 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:50 | 2,459 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 2,459 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
909 reactions across 20 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 463 | 50.9% | |
| ❤ | 147 | 16.2% | |
| 👏 | 79 | 8.69% | |
| 💯 | 55 | 6.05% | |
| 😁 | 35 | 3.85% | |
| 🙏 | 26 | 2.86% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 2.64% | |
| 🥰 | 21 | 2.31% | |
| 🏆 | 10 | 1.10% | |
| 🥴 | 10 | 1.10% | |
| 🙈 | 8 | 0.88% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 0.77% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 0.66% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 0.33% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.33% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.33% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.22% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.11% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.11% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.11% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 0.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 909reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2025 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Die Psychologie der Corona-Kritiker - Warum einige dem Corona-Konsens widersprachen Welche Eigenschaften waren es, die Corona-Kritiker ausmachten? Inwiefern waren jene Menschen darauf vorbereitet oder wird man als Kritiker geboren? https://neuemedizinbibliothek.substack.com/p/warum-einige-dem-corona-konsens-widersprachen t.me/NeueMedizinBibliothek
👍21❤4👏2🙏2🏆1
Vortrag von Stefan Lanka vom 25.06.2026 beim Levana Verbund* Leider ist die Qualität teilweise stark eingeschränkt. 📌Der Vortrag beginnt ab ca. 9:30. 📌Die Folien des Vortrags kommen nach etwa einer Stunde hinzu. *Ton von impfen-nein-danke verbessert https://youtu.be/HExJBEH5NsQ t.me/StefanLanka
👍18❤7🥰2👀1👌1👏1
On a related note, Dutch virologist Marion Koopmans is the one who reaffirmed that Christian Drosten did not have an actual "viral" isolate when developing the fraudulent "Covid" test. All he had was a presumed "viral" genetic code. https://x.com/ViroLIEgy/status/1776986996516196754?s=20
👍20❤3🤔3🤯3👏2🔥1😎1🙈1
Wo liegen die Chancen, Grenzen und Risiken von KI im Gesundheits- und Therapiekontext? https://neuemedizinbibliothek.substack.com/p/kunstliche-intelligenz-im-gesundheits t.me/NeueMedizinBibliothek
👍12❤2🤔1
Gerald Hüther zur Genetik Der Neurobiologe und Inhaber der Akademie für Potentialentfeltung emeritierter Prof. Dr. Gerald Hüther spricht es aus: Die Konsequenzen des bestehenden wissenschaftlichen Wissensstandes zur Genetik ist nie zu Ende gedacht worden. 👉Zu Ende gedacht: Die Genetik hat sich bereits - wie es Stefan Lanka sagt - selbst widerlegt und ist hinfällig. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPeTQYdof7Q Min 1…
👍25❤14🙏4💯2🥰2❤🔥1
🔥Im neuesten Interview bringt Sucharit Bhakdi erneut die Virenexistenzfrage auf den Tisch. Hört selbst was er sagt: "HIV ist ein Betrugsvirus. Es ist überhaupt nicht da. [Claus Köhnlein] hatte Recht." t.me/StefanLanka
👍66❤17🙏7🏆6👏5👎2🥰2👌1
Wieso sollte jeder Experte hinterfragt werden? Das Best of aus einem kürzlichen veröffentlichten Interview: 💡Furan- oder Furinspaltstelle? Oder gibt es überhaupt sowas? 💡In welchen Bundesländern gibt es Untersuchungsgremien zur Corona-Politik? Brandenburg, Sachsen, Thüringen, Hessen? 💡Wie heißt die Kopfbedeckung einer muslimischen Frau? Kebab oder Hijab? 👉Hinterfrage Aussagen und Thematiken egal wer diese tätigt…
😁27👍14❤8🥴7🙏4🙈3🐳1🙉1
Wolfgang Wodarg verleiht seinen Anliegen Nachdruck. 📎Ganzes Video t.me/StefanLanka
👏33👍17❤11🏆3🙏3🤔2🕊1🥴1
#Virenexistenzfrage Wir kommen nur durch Diskurs weiter. Anders sind wir nicht besser, als die, auf die wir zeigen. Danke Matthias Langwasser, Dr. Simon Feldhaus und Marvin Haberland❤️🤝 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvdbVwN8rJw t.me/StefanLanka
👍26❤14👏5👎2🤗1
Corona: Wenn ein Virus sich an Landesgrenzen hält Wenn Virologen aufgrund der epidemiologischen Daten ins Staunen und in Erklärungsnot kommen. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsIs79dUBGM t.me/StefanLanka
👍34❤8👏5👎2💯2🙏1
Die Talkshow-Hosts kommen nicht drum rum, sich ernsthaft mit der Virenexistenzfrage zu beschäftigen. Sie drängt sich immer wieder auf bzw. ins Bewusstsein...🙃 t.me/StefanLanka
👍41😁6🥰4❤3🍾3👏3👌1💯1
Walter Weber - ein Arzt mit Herz - ist Bhakdi voraus Alle Impfungen sind schädlich. t.me/StefanLanka
👍44💯18❤10👏10🔥2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @StefanLanka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 624,959 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stefan Lanka” (@StefanLanka), 2,463 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StefanLanka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.