Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Neue Medizin Bibliothek

Channel

Neue Medizin Bibliothek

@NeueMedizinBibliothek

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,913subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001672762792
TypeChannel
Username@NeueMedizinBibliothek
Created5 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/NeueMedizinBibliothek

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2,9072,9142,910.56 August 2026 — 2,909 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,908 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,907 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,909 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,912 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,910 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,913 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,914 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,912 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,913 subscribers2,9136 August 202618 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 43 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,906–2,915 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 06:382,913+1
14 Sept 2026, 02:572,912-2
10 Sept 2026, 04:222,914+1
5 Sept 2026, 06:372,913+3
25 Aug 2026, 16:022,910-2
19 Aug 2026, 06:022,912+3
16 Aug 2026, 16:232,909+2
13 Aug 2026, 00:272,907-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:382,908-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:172,909first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 27m
Average length
18m 26s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

579 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍29050.1%
❤9917.1%
👏6411.1%
💯488.29%
🔥233.97%
🙏193.28%
👌183.11%
🎉91.55%
🏆61.04%
❤‍🔥30.518%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 579 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 10:56 UTC≈8,600 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ein Manifest für eine menschliche Zukunft Viele Menschen fragen sich, wie die Welt von morgen aussehen soll. Die einen setzen die Hoffnung auf politische Entscheidungen, andere auf eine Veränderung des Öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunks. Gesellschaften verändern sich zwar durch Gesetze und Institutionen, jedoch ebenso durch die Werte, Überzeugungen und das tägliche Handeln der Menschen. Doch die entscheidende Verände…

❤9👏4👍1

5 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC≈9,570 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Die Psychologie der Corona-Kritiker - Warum einige dem Corona-Konsens widersprachen Welche Eigenschaften waren es, die Corona-Kritiker ausmachten? Inwiefern waren jene Menschen darauf vorbereitet oder wird man als Kritiker geboren? https://neuemedizinbibliothek.substack.com/p/warum-einige-dem-corona-konsens-widersprachen t.me/NeueMedizinBibliothek

👍11❤3🏆2👏2🔥1

4 Jun 2026, 08:35 UTC≈7,990 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Wo liegen die Chancen, Grenzen und Risiken von KI im Gesundheits- und Therapiekontext? https://neuemedizinbibliothek.substack.com/p/kunstliche-intelligenz-im-gesundheits t.me/NeueMedizinBibliothek

👍7❤5👌3🙏3

15 May 2026, 19:54 UTC≈16,000 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥"Riesen-Aufregung am Hafen in Palma - Tödlicher Virus-Alarm auf Mallorca!" Das war die Schlagzeile, die wenige Tage vor den Berichten aus Teneriffa zum Hantavirus – am 16.04.2026 – kursierte. So wurde im Hafen von Mallorca im Rahmen der Militärübung MARSEC-26 ausgerechnet die Ausbreitung einer tödlichen Seuche mit mehreren Todesfällen (zwei Menschen und ein Hund) simuliert. An der Übung waren 150 Spezialisten aus…

👍11❤7👌3👏1

14 May 2026, 07:02 UTC≈2,100 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @JavRoJav

What We Lost - (Chapter 1 audio) (by Howdie Mickoski) https://youtu.be/drPIdzzMGU0 PDFs Chapters 1 & 2: https://howdiemickoski.com/book/what-we-lost R:t.me/JavRoJav/545 In:https://www.facebook.com/61109134/posts/10105462737542582 T:t.me/JavRoJav/560

❤3👍2👏1

11 May 2026, 11:42 UTC≈19,300 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#Hantavirus Welche Zufälle gibt es im Zusammenhang mit dem angeblichen Hanta-Virus? Das wichtigste ist ruhig zu bleiben und Panikmeldungen nicht zu teilen. Denn solange das Hanta-Virus nicht isoliert wurde, gibt es hierzu keinen Anlass :) https://neuemedizinbibliothek.substack.com/p/der-hanta-virus-zwischenstand-fakten t.me/NeueMedizinBibliothek

👍29🙏4❤3❤‍🔥2👌1

29 Jan 2026, 17:49 UTC≈4,770 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

#Bioelektrizität Musik, die von einem Pilz gespielt wird - aus einem Kunstprojekt, das sich mit natürlichen Rhythmen beschäftigt. Jon Ross und Andy Kidd, hinter dem Bionic & The Wires-Projekt, schließen Pilze an Geräte an, die ihre bioelektrischen Signale aufzeichnen und diese zur Steuerung bionischer Arme nutzen. Dazu kommt noch ein Keyboard und voilà – Pilzmusik. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbP2DgDp890 t.me…

👍8❤5👏2❤‍🔥1🏆1💯1🔥1

29 Jan 2026, 17:16 UTC≈15,300 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Die Serotonin-Hypothese #Hormone Viele Antidepressiva basieren auf der Annahme, dass sie einen Serotoninmangel ausgleichen – doch laut einer aktuellen systematischen Übersichtsarbeit gibt es dafür keine überzeugenden wissenschaftlichen Belege. Messungen von Serotonin und Abbauprodukten zeigen keine klaren Unterschiede zwischen depressiven und gesunden Personen. Fazit: Die Idee vom „chemischen Ungleichgewicht“ und …

👍15👏6❤3👌1

3 Nov 2025, 08:05 UTC≈66,100 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Was ist wirklich ein Mechanismus, der für Form und Entwicklung von Leben entscheidend ist, wenn nicht die Genetik? Bioelektrizität. Michael Levin zeigte, dass bioelektrische Signale steuern, welche Körperteile wachsen, regenerieren oder unterdrückt werden. Ein Plattwurm (Planarie) kann, wenn er in Stücke zerteilt wird, aus jedem Teil wieder zu einem vollständigen Wurm regenerieren. Durch Veränderung der elektrische…

👍20❤7👏3👌2🔥1🙏1

18 Oct 2025, 07:09 UTC≈8,700 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Genetik Wie valide sind genetische Sequenzanalysen, wenn in einem aktuellen Preprint-Fallbericht bei einer Frau nach drei Moderna-Impfungen eine Sequenz gefunden wurde, die Pfizer (BNT162b2-Plasmid­) zugeordnet wurde (weil die Moderna-Plasmidsequenz in öffentlichen Datenbanken fehlte)?🙃 t.me/NeueMedizinBibliothek

🎉9💯5❤3👍3🙏1

15 Oct 2025, 17:11 UTC≈4,590 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Kurzer Kommentar in eigener Sache Es ist erfreulich, wenn die Beiträge von uns gefallen, aufklären und geteilt werden. Dafür danken wir euch und fühlen uns in der Arbeit bestätigt🙂 Wenn es jedoch so ist, dass alle Quellen zum Ersteller aus dem Posttext entfernt werden, aber sonst unseren Beitrag nahezu 1:1 kopiert wird, dann würde man in der Wissenschaft oder Unternehmenskontext von Plagiat, Urheberrechtsverletzung…

👍36💯10👏8❤6👌2🙏1

14 Oct 2025, 18:58 UTC≈21,300 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Wieso ist die Virenexistenzfrage so zentral? Weil die Ausrufung eines Gesundheitnotstand in Verbindung mit angeblichen viralen Erregern die Grundlage für all die Maßnahmen und Aktionen darstellt. Aktuell findet der Global Health Summit statt und dort ist die Botschaft von den Sprechern sehr deutlich: Wir sind nicht in Friedenszeiten. Genau solche Panik verfliegt in dem Moment, sobald die Angst vor Viren und damit d…

👍21💯18❤6🔥3👌2🏆1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NeueMedizinBibliothek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Neue Medizin Bibliothek” (@NeueMedizinBibliothek), 2,913 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NeueMedizinBibliothek.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.