Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Francesca Quibla

Channel

Francesca Quibla

@FraQuibla

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,053subscribers

-218 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001701518765
TypeChannel
Username@FraQuibla
DescriptionIl Tempo, metterà ogni cosa al suo posto: ogni pagliaccio nel proprio circo e ogni re sul proprio trono.
Created1 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/FraQuibla

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,0537,2717,1626 August 2026 — 7,271 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,269 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,260 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,258 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,246 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,235 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,222 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,218 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,215 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,203 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,204 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,181 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,180 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,173 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,155 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,144 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,133 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,127 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,117 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,111 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,104 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,096 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,078 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,067 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,056 subscribers8 November 2026 — 7,053 subscribers6 August 20268 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 94 days, net -218. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,020–7,304 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 16:567,053-3
5 Nov 2026, 03:077,056-11
2 Nov 2026, 05:307,067-11
30 Oct 2026, 13:157,078-18
27 Oct 2026, 09:267,096-8
24 Oct 2026, 16:077,104-7
21 Oct 2026, 09:157,111-6
18 Oct 2026, 17:367,117-10
15 Oct 2026, 07:467,127-6
12 Oct 2026, 11:417,133-11
5 Oct 2026, 22:207,144-11
28 Sept 2026, 13:597,155-18
19 Sept 2026, 04:367,173-7
14 Sept 2026, 18:597,180-1
11 Sept 2026, 07:587,181-23
6 Sept 2026, 06:587,204+1
2 Sept 2026, 04:447,203-12
29 Aug 2026, 19:177,215-3
26 Aug 2026, 12:257,218-4
23 Aug 2026, 12:247,222first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 7,053 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,210
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held45 (11 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total15,706
Reactions total388
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 18:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,480
Videos
≈2,480
Links
≈5,330

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 19s
Average length
1m 43s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,136 reactions across 43 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤46941.3%
👍37933.4%
🔥21318.8%
👎756.60%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,136 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (15.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 12:10 UTC687 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @byebyeunclesamPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

👍15

29 Oct 2026, 10:24 UTC≈1,490 views49 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

636. Dedicato ai forcaioli. Non credo di aver mai letto, nella pur mia lunga carriera a contatto con diverse autorità giudiziarie, un comunicato così fermo, così alto, così perfetto, così «resistente» come quello firmato dalla presidente della sezione GIP-GUP, dott.ssa Vincenza Maccora, e dal presidente del Tribunale di Milano, dott. Fabio Roja. È un comunicato schietto, senza fronzoli, che prova a spiegare ad alcun…

👍32❤13👎4

29 Oct 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,210 views33 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

La mortificazione è del popolo italiano che si ritrova voi, servi dei sionisti, avete mandato il paese in rovina. Ma vergognati tu! Questo è ancora (non si sa per quanto) uno stato di diritto! E voi andate a cercarvi qualche tombino e buttatevici dentro, tornate a casa!! E levati sti filtri demmer*a che hai usato

👍23🔥9❤1

29 Oct 2026, 06:32 UTC≈1,380 views22 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

SCHIFO!!!! «È vivo?», «Sta respirando?». Poi: «Per me può essere pure schiattato». E ancora: «C… me ne frega a me». Fino a «Se schiatta ci divertiamo». Sono alcune delle frasi registrate dalla bodycam di uno dei poliziotti intervenuti il 19 luglio al Pilastro, a Bologna, quando Abderrahim Fakir, 42 anni, morì durante un intervento di polizia. Le conversazioni sono riportate nella consulenza medico-legale depositata …

🔥13❤9

27 Oct 2026, 13:57 UTC≈2,820 views22 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Cmq, in Francia e in tutta Europa le "FORZE DELL'ORDINE" hanno un numero identificativo. L'Italia continua a disattendere e ad essere condannata ripetutamente dalla Corte Europea Dei Diritti dell'Uomo Qui una serie di fatti successi negli ultimi sei mesi: Le cronache giudiziarie in Italia hanno registrato diverse inchieste che hanno coinvolto esponenti delle forze dell'ordine per gravi reati. Tra queste spiccano pro…

👍11🔥8❤3

27 Oct 2026, 11:15 UTC846 views32 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Ho sfogliato qualche post di Youssef Siher e la pagina Instagram del Movimento 17 ottobre. Non vedo, in franchezza, alcuna istigazione a delinquere. Non so quali altri elementi ci siano. Il post più spinto mi pare quello che commenta le immagini di un cappotto rubato donato da alcuni manifestanti a un senzatetto, con la scritta 'si chiama esproprio proletario'. Se è così, anche le migliaia di assemblee pubbliche d…

👍31❤1

27 Oct 2026, 10:35 UTC710 views25 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Non lasciare solo Youssef Siher: una raccolta fondi per sostenere la sua difesa by Davide Piccardo Ottobre 27, 2026 Qui il link https://laluce.news/non-lasciare-solo-youssef-siher-una-raccolta-fondi-per-sostenere-la-sua-difesa/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAVNXY5jbGNrBU1damV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHBkb2YBc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMzUwNjg1NTMxNzI4AAEeGwMHmYjRCPfY5ZiqcJXVZ3inyEq0K-GWM7AgQkIYWPXd8_2YbI7IFRaHKpQ_aem_dxdxYaBE3hKfMcoAaFR4Zg

👍15❤7👎2🔥1

27 Oct 2026, 10:04 UTC≈1,080 views40 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Bravissimo Gianni Barbacetto su Youssef Siher: «Ho letto attentamente le 11 pagine del “Fermo di indiziato di delitto” firmato dal pm di Milano nei confronti di Youssef Siher. Non vi ho trovato contestato alcun fatto criminale concreto, né tantomeno elementi fattuali per dimostrare le “finalità di terrorismo”. 1. Il gruppo Telegram e l’account Instagram “Movimento 17 ottobre” nascono la sera del 18, DOPO che sono te…

👍31❤9

26 Oct 2026, 15:43 UTC829 views37 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Forse non è chiara una cosa, non è Vučić o il governo di turno, chiunque esso sia, ad avere la licenza di stringere alleanze o buoni rapporti o meno con la Russia. Il rapporto tra Russia e Serbia non appartiene a questo o quello, il rapporto tra Russia e Serbia appartiene alla memoria del popolo serbo e basta! Qui i rapporti di tipo commerciale e i posizionamenti di carattere geopolitico sono una conseguenza delle pr…

❤21👍14🔥2

26 Oct 2026, 11:11 UTC854 views34 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Non so perché, sarà che Mercurio retrogrado mi sta facendo questo effetto, ma oggi sono in vena di esprimermi su alcune questioni. Ora, tra le varie robe che mi vengono in mente ho pensato di fare un applauso nostalgico a due veri visionari : Massimo Carminati e Salvatore Buzzi. Il primo un ex terrorista dei NAR, nero che più nero non si può. L'altro il re delle cooperative rosse. Due mondi e ideologie apparentemen…

👍22❤11🔥1

23 Oct 2026, 07:46 UTC≈1,090 views28 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @contronarrazionePhoto

📢🇪🇺🤡—Segnaliamo la circolare diffusa dai sindacati di regime contro gli scioperi degli autotrasportatori. Quando una protesta non è funzionale al dominio euro-atlantico, la feccia della Triplice è sempre in prima linea per combatterla. 🇮🇹Segui Contronarrazione

🔥24👎4

23 Oct 2026, 07:46 UTC≈1,110 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @streamLalucePhoto

Chi finanzia la propaganda israeliana in Italia? Partendo dalla Who Funded Genocide Interactive Map, il nostro quotidiano ha condotto un’inchiesta incrociando dati, contratti pubblici e documenti societari. Ne emerge una rete che attraversa politica, grandi gruppi editoriali e società di comunicazione. Milioni di shekel autorizzati dal governo israeliano per campagne pubblicitarie digitali. Tra le piattaforme coinv…

🔥10👎6

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @FraQuibla. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

la fionda📕
@lafionda · 20,054
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 September 2026
Weltanschauung Italia
@weltanschauungitaliaofficial · 23,864
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 September 2026
Paolo Bellavite
@PaoloBellavite · 31,258
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
BECCIOLINI NETWORK Informazione libera
@canaleFAHRENHEIT912 · 21,934
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 September 2026
Rossella Fidanza
@RossellaFidanza · 28,842
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
Matteo Brandi - Canale Ufficiale
@MatBrandi · 23,264
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026
Giuseppe Masala Chili 🌶
@giuseppemasala · 22,582
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026
ARSENALE K CHANNEL - Circolo Ricreativo delle Bestie di Satira
@ArsenaleKappa · 21,341
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 September 2026
Visione Tv
@visionetv · 40,066
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
ALI - Avvocati Liberi
@avvocati_liberi · 21,345
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
POLIVOX di Clara Statello
@clarastatello · 28,318
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 9 September 2026
giuliettochiesareal
@giuliettochiesareal · 12
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Francesca Quibla” (@FraQuibla), 7,053 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FraQuibla.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.