Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
event!𐙚 𝙁𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘭𝘺'𝘴 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭 ᝰ.ᐟ
@FiRefLyYSun
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
26subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003919488220 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FiRefLyYSun |
| Description | cr на аватарку и архив : offical на навигацию : Qingcichuan on x |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 21 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FiRefLyYSun |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 26 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 26 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 193.7%
- avg views ÷ 26 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 50.4
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 25.5%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 July 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 856 |
| Reactions total | 122 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 3
- Links
- 5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
122 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5415789658145588375 | 45 | 36.9% | |
| 🕊 | 43 | 35.2% | |
| custom 5417984618362076464 | 34 | 27.9% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 14
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 8
- of 17 we hold a reading for · 47%
- Most on one post
- 6
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FiRefLyYSun. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
adm. спасибо большое за 25 подписчиков , очень целую обнимаю всех , прям вот каждого ебланлоне , тюбика , тойю , бейдксу , эделей , великого саппорта уотсоки , саппортов байчжу, св и нигилюксы , илюшу , отто , ьминтика , 505 , джесс , эйрив , втубера , эйриф , яуну , меокс , трудоголика , акиссу ( простите , если не правильно прочитала ) , эль , акселинн , лу и кадзу! и отдельное повторное спасибо илюше за звезды 🤩🤩🤩…
custom 54157896581455883757custom 54179846183620764644🕊3
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌑🌑🤩Я неловко улыбнулась. По Волку было видно, что она собиралась наспех, но я решила это не комментировать, чтобы не злить ее. Быстро собранной она кажется милее. 🤩🤩Потому что я более чем 🤩🤩уверена, что она еще покричит в аркадах. От этих мыслей я тихонько хихикнула и, поняв, что это было слишком неожиданно и наверняка громко, смутилась. – Спасибо. Так мы идем?По-моему, как раз сегодня утром принесли еще один автомат…
custom 541578965814558837513🕊11custom 541798461836207646411
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌑🌑🌑Мы договорились со Серебрянным волком поиграть вместе в аркады. 🤩🤩На самом деле я не 🤩🤩профессионал в них, но хочется оставить что-то приятное с курорта. Я не хочу мешать первопроходцам, ведь наверняка они сейчас обзаводятся друзьями. 🤩🤩Идти мне до нее 🤩🤩далеко – меня поселили в самый обычный номер внизу. Я даже немного волнуюсь, мы столько не виделись... Но, судя по ее общению в чате, это всё та же Волк! 🌑🌑🌑🤩🤩🤩Я …
🕊4custom 54157896581455883754custom 54179846183620764643
Channel name was changed to «event!𐙚 𝙁𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘭𝘺'𝘴 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭 ᝰ.ᐟ»
🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟 #EVENT 🌟Устали от всех хлопот? Хочется отдохнуть, оставив лишние заботы? Солнечный свет мягко озаряет маленький тихий островок-курорт. Это то самое место. Тропический климат, море, пляж, все наилучшие эмоции и многое другое - это, то, что предстоит встретить на отдыхе в уютном райском уголке. Попутно это может превратиться в незабываемое приключение для всех его участников. Общий чат отдыхающих курорта — тык…
custom 54157896581455883751custom 54179846183620764641
🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩🤩🤩🤩Мы очень хорошо погуляли с Яньцином! Сейчас я уже на Пенаконии, так как у меня есть пару дел. 🤩🤩Мне кажется, будто на 🤩🤩Лофу я скупила все сладости, которые только смогла! Надеюсь, Охотникам понадобится прилететь туда еще раз, по крайней мере, будет что показать Серебрянному волку! 🌑🌑🌑🤩🤩🤩Интересно, как она сейчас? Наверное, играет днями напролет или взламывает что-нибудь. 🌑🌑🤩🤩Она же сейчас на Двумернии, если я не
custom 54179846183620764646🕊5custom 54157896581455883754
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩🤩Аллея Аурум? Ялики? 🤩🤩Ох, по-моему, я запуталась... Надо было действительно расспросить охотников насчёт Лофу. 🌑🌑🤩🤩Возвышающее святилище... Звучит очень... опасно, не уверена, что мне там будут рады. А вдруг там куча монстров... О, и, наверное, здесь охотникам не очень рады... 🌑🌑🤩🤩🤩Нужно придумать себе имя или надеяться, что молодой человек не догадается? Впрочем, есть еще шансы, что в Лофу не искали охотников. – С…
custom 54157896581455883755🕊3custom 54179846183620764643
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FiRefLyYSun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 560,971 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@YanqingSun · 373 postsevent | — 𝐀𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐚 ༊·˚
@AponiaSun · 301 post[EVENT] || 𝗔𝘀𝗮𝗯𝗮 𝗛𝗮𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗮𝘀𝗮 | 𝗛.𝗦.𝗢.𝗦. 𝟲
@asabaharumasa_sun · 371 post𝔅𝔞𝔯𝔟𝔞𝔯𝔞 — event
@BarbaraSun · 301 postevent!𝘾𝙖𝙚𝙡𝙪𝙨 / 🦝
@CaELuSun · 321 postCaesar Cerydra ~ rest
@Cerydra_Sun · 401 postEVENT | ⋮ ⌗ ┆ᑕᕼOᑎGYᑌᑎ – YOᑌᑎG E᙭OᖇᑕIST!
@Chongyun_sun · 301 postEVENT Cissia 🐍 | точно-не-из-собеза
@CissiaSUN · 351 post𝓮𝐯𝓮𝐧𝐭ㅤִℰ𝐝𝐞۫𝐧ㅤ𝄞۫ㅤִ𝐈𝐕
@EdenDiva_Sun · 561 postevent | ˚˖𓍢ִ໋❀ 𝐸𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑎 | 绯英 ⊹ ࣪ ˖ ໒꒱
@EvanesciaSun · 461 postEVENT | 𝑮𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒂𝒈𝒉𝒆𝒓
@gallagher_sun · 241 postevent | 𝗛𝗲𝗿 𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘀... 𝗝𝗮𝗻𝗲 𝗗𝗼𝗲?
@JaneDoe_Sun · 311 post𝐊𝐥𝐞𝐞-𝐊𝐧𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐑𝐞𝐝
@Klee_Knight_Sun · 681 postEVENT | 𝓚osma
@kosma_sun · 321 postⲠⲥυⲭⲟⲗⲟⲅ Юⲙэⲙυⲇⳅⲩⲕυ Ⲙυⲇⳅⲩⲕυ.
@Mizuki_Sun · 341 post𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁 ::🕊:: 𝗦𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘆ᵗᵉᵐᵖᵒʳᵃʳʸ ᵗʳᵃᵛᵉᶫᵉʳ.
@MrSunday_Sun · 3221 postEvent :: @. 𝒩𝒶𝓃𝒸𝓎 𝒯𝒽ℴ𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝒜𝓁𝓋𝒶 ℰ𝒹𝒾𝓈ℴ𝓃 🗂
@NancyTAE_Sun · 201 postevent!|░▒▓█►─═𝓝𝓲𝓱𝓲𝓵𝓾𝔁═─◄█▓▒░
@Nihilux_sun · 291 post⋆˙𝜗𝑆𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑛ৎ⟡
@sirinsun · 451 post[rest] 𝑺𝙋𝘼𝙍𝙓𝙄𝙀'𝙎 𝑺𝙏𝙍𝙀𝘼𝙈!
@SparxieSun · 381 post𝕄𝕒𝕤𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕠𝕗 𝔾𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕦𝕤[Event]
@TheHertaNo1_sun · 421 postִ 𝐻𝑢 𝑇𝑎𝑜 胡涛 𓈒ㅤ͝🪦
@Wh0Ta0_Sun · 681 postevent | 𝒀𝒊𝒅𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒊 | 𝑺𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒘𝒃𝒆𝒓𝒓𝒚 𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒇𝒂𝒊𝒕
@Yidhari_Sun · 271 postevent!|𝘡𝘩𝘶 𝘠𝘶𝘢𝘯|𝘙𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨...
@Zhu_Yuan_Sun · 261 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@YanqingSun · 374 posts[E V E N T] 𝕤𝕚𝕝𝕧𝕖𝕣 𝕨𝕠𝕝𝕗 👾🐺
@SilverWolfSun · 402 postsevent | — 𝐀𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐚 ༊·˚
@AponiaSun · 301 post𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗧░ 𝗔𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗲_𝗟𝗶𝗳𝗲ᵃᶫᶫ ᵒʳ ᶰᵒᵗʰᶦᶰᵍ
@AventurineSun · 1201 postBelle's stories[Event]
@Belle_sun · 241 postevent!𝘾𝙖𝙚𝙡𝙪𝙨 / 🦝
@CaELuSun · 321 postEVENT | ⋮ ⌗ ┆ᑕᕼOᑎGYᑌᑎ – YOᑌᑎG E᙭OᖇᑕIST!
@Chongyun_sun · 301 postДень ВП| «E᥎ᥱᥒᴛ» ⋆。 ゚☾ ゚。⋆ 𝔻𝕒𝕟 ℍ𝕖𝕟𝕘 ⋆。 ゚☾ ゚。⋆
@DanHeng_Sun · 911 post🦈
@EllenJoe_sun · 221 postʸᵒᵘʳ~ 𝕄𝑖𝑠𝑠-𝕡𝑖𝑛𝑘-𝕖𝑙𝑓 !♪.
@Elysia_SUN · 451 postШЕРСТЯКАМ ГОРЕТЬ
@furboboweekly_sun · 421 postEVENT | 𝑮𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒂𝒈𝒉𝒆𝒓
@gallagher_sun · 241 post[EVENT] 𝗦𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗹𝗲-𝘁𝗵𝗲-𝗚𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁! [花火] 💥
@hanabi_sun · 531 postEVENT | 𝓚osma
@kosma_sun · 321 postevent!|░▒▓█►─═𝓝𝓲𝓱𝓲𝓵𝓾𝔁═─◄█▓▒░
@Nihilux_sun · 291 post𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭||𝓞𝓽𝓽𝓸 𝓐𝓹𝓸𝓬𝓪𝓵𝔂𝓹𝓼𝓮
@Otto_Apocalypse_sun · 481 post𝙀𝙑𝙀𝙉𝙏 🥥 ᪶ᛝ ۪۫ ଓଓ 𝓟𝝰ׅ𝗿𝗱𖹭𝗳ɛׂ𝗹𝗶𝘀
@PardoSun · 341 post[rest] 𝑺𝙋𝘼𝙍𝙓𝙄𝙀'𝙎 𝑺𝙏𝙍𝙀𝘼𝙈!
@SparxieSun · 381 post𝕄𝕒𝕤𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕠𝕗 𝔾𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕦𝕤[Event]
@TheHertaNo1_sun · 421 post[ 𝓔𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓽 ] :: 𝙒𝙚𝙡𝙩 𝙅𝙤𝙮𝙘𝙚 🎐
@WeltJoyceSUN · 361 postִ 𝐻𝑢 𝑇𝑎𝑜 胡涛 𓈒ㅤ͝🪦
@Wh0Ta0_Sun · 681 post𐔌՞ 𝙀𝙫𝙚𝙣𝙩! / 𝙓𝙞𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙜 ՞ 𐦯
@XianglingSun · 301 postevent | 𝒀𝒊𝒅𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒊 | 𝑺𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒘𝒃𝒆𝒓𝒓𝒚 𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒇𝒂𝒊𝒕
@Yidhari_Sun · 271 postˑ 𓈒 𐔌𝖤͟𝗏͟𝖾͟𝗇𝗍! ✨️ 𝖡͟𝖾͟𝗌𝗍 𝖳𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖤𝗏𝖾𝗋! ͡꒱ ۫
@YourBestGuide_Sun · 281 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“event!𐙚 𝙁𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘭𝘺'𝘴 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭 ᝰ.ᐟ” (@FiRefLyYSun), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FiRefLyYSun.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.