Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

День ВП| «E᥎ᥱᥒᴛ» ⋆。 ゚☾ ゚。⋆ 𝔻𝕒𝕟 ℍ𝕖𝕟𝕘 ⋆。 ゚☾ ゚。⋆

@DanHeng_Sun

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

91subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003953592312
TypeChannel
Username@DanHeng_Sun
DescriptionМоё имя Дань Хэн. Рад встречи с вами. cr png: @hoyopng
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/DanHeng_Sun

Growth

909190.59 Aug 2026, 04:15 — 90 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 14:15 — 91 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 14:16 — 91 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 04:159 Aug 2026, 14:16
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 90–91 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 14:1691no change
9 Aug 2026, 14:1591+1
9 Aug 2026, 04:1590first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.6%
avg views ÷ 91 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.8
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
33.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total643
Reactions total60
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
32
Videos
2
Links
54

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

60 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52336973083815755481830.0%
custom 52335706025513779671626.7%
custom 52201138558326795241118.3%
custom 5368440877817557078711.7%
custom 523325397326734899958.33%
custom 520424045127562688123.33%
custom 526740444364881933311.67%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DanHeng_Sun. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC13 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @dailycfscaraPhoto

➰|искали дейли/кф по Страннику? хотели бы насладиться разнообразным контентом по вашему любимому персонажу? а может, хотите сами поделиться своим творчеством? добро пожаловать в наш дейли/кф, где вы можете это всё увидеть! ⌒ ⊹ ➰୧ 🌟 ׅ ⊹ навигация|правила|ВП|администрация ⌒ ⊹୧ cr: twt

9 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC16 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @xzpopapiPhoto

🤩⏜‌⌢ 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 🪦 ⎯ ︎︎◟💘 ₎︎ ︎ 𝐙𝐡𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐱𝐢𝐚𝐨 ݄𝐝𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐲𝒄𝒇 🤩 Понравилась ♡‌ ֹдинамика ─ׁ Повелителя камня 🌟 🌟 ‹ и нелюдимого Адепта ╎ ︵ׄ⏜ 𝐚𝐧𝐝 нуждаешься в —— контенте по ним ❓ ⏝︶ 🤩⎯ׅ⎯ׄ 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 ❗️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩𝒸𝓁𝒾𝒸𝓀 𝒸𝓁𝒾𝒸𝓀

9 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC30 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @dailysnezhnayaVideo

❤️🤩онравились персонажи Снежной, и ты хочешь видеть контент по всем сразу?

9 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC31 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ads_PhainonAndKhaslanaPhoto

🤩🤩 Да, я кинню Дань Хэна... 🤩🤩 ❌И почему ты до сих пор не подписан???🤔

9 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «День ВП| «E᥎ᥱᥒᴛ» ⋆。 ゚☾ ゚。⋆ 𝔻𝕒𝕟 ℍ𝕖𝕟𝕘 ⋆。 ゚☾ ゚。⋆»

9 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC22 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @newlifeinfooPhoto

ㅤ 🪶 ⋮ 🔤elcome to 🔤ew 🔤ife . Сеть каналов по HSR & Morimens 🌟 ( Ваша жизнь была наполнена грехами, мерзостью и отвращением, ваши глаза наполнены злобой и отчаянием, сожалением и слезами. Вы ступили на путь порока, но вам выпал шанс, способный изменить всё. . )  🔤авигация 🌟 🔤абор в адм

9 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «День ВП| «E᥎ᥱᥒᴛ» ⋆。 ゚☾ ゚。⋆Ⲣⲉʀⲙⲁⲛⲋⲟʀ Ⲧⲉʀʀⲁⲉ⋆。 ゚☾ ゚。⋆»

8 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC37 views19 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

Вот оно как: я неправильно его понял. Я думал, моё присутствие давит, а оказалось наоборот — Келусу комфортно рядом со мной. Мне комфортно со всеми на Экспрессе: каждый создаёт разную атмосферу комфорта и понимания. Это нечто уникальное, что не может повториться никогда в жизни, а сейчас... Я ошибся в своём понимании Келуса, нужно исправиться. 🌟 — Аквапарк? Удивительная способность быстро менять тему, но сейчас это

custom 523357060255137796710custom 52336973083815755484custom 53684408778175570784custom 52674044436488193331

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DanHeng_Sun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 285,034 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 44 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

event!𝘾𝙖𝙚𝙡𝙪𝙨 / 🦝
@CaELuSun · 32
4 posts
Прайс
@ads_PhainonAndKhaslana · 4
2 posts
EVENT | ₊˚⊹/ 𝒀𝒂𝒏𝒒𝒊𝒏𝒈 - 𝑪𝒍𝒐𝒖𝒅 𝑲𝒏𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 𝑳𝒊𝒆𝒖𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒂𝒏𝒕 /<𝟑 .ᐟ
@YanqingSun · 37
2 posts
event | — 𝐀𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐚 ༊·˚
@AponiaSun · 30
1 post
[EVENT] || 𝗔𝘀𝗮𝗯𝗮 𝗛𝗮𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗮𝘀𝗮 | 𝗛.𝗦.𝗢.𝗦. 𝟲
@asabaharumasa_sun · 37
1 post
𝔅𝔞𝔯𝔟𝔞𝔯𝔞 — event
@BarbaraSun · 30
1 post
Caesar Cerydra ~ rest
@Cerydra_Sun · 40
1 post
EVENT | ⋮ ⌗ ┆ᑕᕼOᑎGYᑌᑎ – YOᑌᑎG E᙭OᖇᑕIST!
@Chongyun_sun · 30
1 post
EVENT Cissia 🐍 | точно-не-из-собеза
@CissiaSUN · 35
1 post
scaramouche/wanderer daily & cf
@dailycfscara · 87
1 post
𝓮𝐯𝓮𝐧𝐭ㅤִℰ𝐝𝐞۫𝐧ㅤ𝄞۫ㅤִ𝐈𝐕
@EdenDiva_Sun · 56
1 post
event | ˚˖𓍢ִ໋❀ 𝐸𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑎 | 绯英 ⊹ ࣪ ˖ ໒꒱
@EvanesciaSun · 46
1 post
EVENT | 𝑮𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒂𝒈𝒉𝒆𝒓
@gallagher_sun · 24
1 post
event | 𝗛𝗲𝗿 𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘀... 𝗝𝗮𝗻𝗲 𝗗𝗼𝗲?
@JaneDoe_Sun · 31
1 post
EVENT | 𝓚osma
@kosma_sun · 32
1 post
Ⲡⲥυⲭⲟⲗⲟⲅ Юⲙэⲙυⲇⳅⲩⲕυ Ⲙυⲇⳅⲩⲕυ.
@Mizuki_Sun · 34
1 post
𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁 ::🕊:: 𝗦𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘆ᵗᵉᵐᵖᵒʳᵃʳʸ ᵗʳᵃᵛᵉᶫᵉʳ.
@MrSunday_Sun · 322
1 post
Event :: @. 𝒩𝒶𝓃𝒸𝓎 𝒯𝒽ℴ𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝒜𝓁𝓋𝒶 ℰ𝒹𝒾𝓈ℴ𝓃 🗂
@NancyTAE_Sun · 20
1 post
event!|░▒▓█►─═𝓝𝓲𝓱𝓲𝓵𝓾𝔁═─◄█▓▒░
@Nihilux_sun · 29
1 post
⋆˙𝜗𝑆𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑛ৎ⟡
@sirinsun · 45
1 post
𝕄𝕒𝕤𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕠𝕗 𝔾𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕦𝕤[Event]
@TheHertaNo1_sun · 42
1 post
ִ 𝐻𝑢 𝑇𝑎𝑜 胡涛 𓈒ㅤ͝🪦
@Wh0Ta0_Sun · 68
1 post
event | 𝒀𝒊𝒅𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒊 | 𝑺𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒘𝒃𝒆𝒓𝒓𝒚 𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒇𝒂𝒊𝒕
@Yidhari_Sun · 27
1 post
event!|𝘡𝘩𝘶 𝘠𝘶𝘢𝘯|𝘙𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨...
@Zhu_Yuan_Sun · 26
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“День ВП| «E᥎ᥱᥒᴛ» ⋆。 ゚☾ ゚。⋆ 𝔻𝕒𝕟 ℍ𝕖𝕟𝕘 ⋆。 ゚☾ ゚。⋆” (@DanHeng_Sun), 91 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DanHeng_Sun.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.