Channel
@BarbaraSun
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
30subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003782432455 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BarbaraSun |
| Created | 10 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BarbaraSun |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 30 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 30 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (10 May 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 204 |
| Reactions total | 37 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
157 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 50 | 31.8% | |
| 🐳 | 49 | 31.2% | |
| 🆒 | 41 | 26.1% | |
| ☃ | 12 | 7.64% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 3.18% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BarbaraSun. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 May 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤩🤩🤩 🐋🐋🐋𝔰𝔲𝔪𝔪𝔢𝔯! 🔠й-ой, мне кажется, я совсем разучилась отдыхать... Я не могу расслабиться от слова совсем. Даже если знаю, что Кли в надёжных руках. Даже если вижу, что она спокойно играет, или даже если она вовсе рядом! Вот вчера я вышла немного позагорать на солнце, но вместо тёплого места в тени зонтика полдня бегала с детьми и лечила их ранения и ссадины. Это же так больно — купаться с т…
🆒6🕊5🐳4☃1
🤩🤩🤩 🐋🐋🐋𝔰𝔲𝔪𝔪𝔢𝔯! 🔠е ожидала, что господин Лоэн так быстро согласится. Он совсем не производит впечатления человека, которому действительно было бы интересно заниматься подобным. В конце концов, разве для этого нет дежурных рыцарей, которым можно поручить такую работу?.. Но ни Отто, ни Арамис так ничего и не смогли сделать. Все, не будем больше об этом думать! Возможность поговорить с …
🐳4🕊3🆒3
Channel name was changed to «𝔅𝔞𝔯𝔟𝔞𝔯𝔞 — event»
🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟 #EVENT 🌟Устали от всех хлопот? Хочется отдохнуть, оставив лишние заботы? Солнечный свет мягко озаряет маленький тихий островок-курорт. Это то самое место. Тропический климат, море, пляж, все наилучшие эмоции и многое другое - это, то, что предстоит встретить на отдыхе в уютном райском уголке. Попутно это может превратиться в незабываемое приключение для всех его участников. Общий чат отдыхающих курорта — тык…
🤩🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟 Барбара и Аглая | @Aglaea_Sun и @BarbaraSun нуждаются в отдыхе. Их не будет до 27 июля. 🤩 🌟 Просьба не беспокоить саппорта до окончания реста.
🔠ризнаться честно... ужасно хочется. С губ сорвался тихий смешок. Кажется, господин Лоэн ожидал от меня куда более бурной реакции. Неужели он действительно готовит эти жевательные сладости сам? Никогда бы не подумала, что подобное занятие может прийтись ему по душе. Наверное... детям такое очень понравилось бы. Ах, кого я пытаюсь обмануть? Сколько раз мондштадские ребята прибегали ко мне с жалобами, уверяя, что го…
🕊5🐳3🆒3
🔠а самом деле, нам с господином Лоэном даже не о чем поговорить. Наши интересы почти не пересекаются, а род деятельности настолько разный, что порой кажется, будто мы живём в совершенно разных мирах. Мне никогда не приходилось выслеживать и карать преступников, составлять отчёты или разбираться с бесконечной документацией. Да и мои руки никогда не держали ничего тяжелее Святого Писания, нот для церковного хора или ко…
🐳5🕊3🆒3
🔠еня никогда детально не посвящали в дела рыцарей — как минимум, не обязаны были, а может, сестра сама попросила не вмешивать меня... Но прямо сейчас этот факт сыграл со мной злую шутку. Я ведь совсем не знала об отмене решения магистра назначить господина Лоэна капитаном! 😳 Ох, ну что за неловкая ситуация получилась... Неужели я расстроила его своими словами? Или, что ещё хуже, оскорбила? В... вот как! Прошу меня п…
🐳6🆒6🕊5
Иногда мы так долго воспеваем жизнь, что вовсе забываем о том, что должны убаюкивать смерть. Каждая сестра в церкви знает, что это настигнет всех нас. Мы привыкли чувствовать спинами ее холод, а некоторые из нас знают, когда она сделает следующий ход. Но старики или больные — это одно. Мы готовы проводить даже тех, кто вчера кричал о воли к жизни. Это тоже часть моих обязанностей. Как «сестра» я знаю, что встречу э…
🕊6🐳5🆒4
🔠ак-то давно я предлагала идею “школы для перевоспитания шкодников“, но она не увенчалась успехом — детвору хлебом не корми, дай побаловаться. Но недавно Магистр напомнил мне об этой идее и сказал что у него есть пару рыцарей на перевоспитание.. И привел в пример одного очень заносчивого капитана. А после недавних слухов про историю с бабушкой я всерьез задумалась о такой школе опять. 🪽🪽🕯🕯🕯🕯 🤩
🐳7☃6🕊5🆒1
Кто твое любимое животное? Неспешные выдры из Фонтейна очень милые! И кошки, и собачки...ох, тяжело выбрать любимое животное, когда вокруг так много маленьких зверьков🪽 Ты только поешь или на музыкальных предметах тоже играешь? Некоторое время назад в мои обязанности входило не только пение, но для игры на музыкальных инструментах требуются длинные пальцы в большинстве случаев. Потому игру на органе или любом друг…
🐳7☃5🕊5🆒3
🔠егодня, должно быть, один из самых счастливых дней в моей жизни! Ох, Барбатос, это твоё благословение, не иначе 🪽 В чем же причина моей радости? Моя старшая сестра освободилась от работы и пригласила меня и отца на пикник в Долину Ветров. Конечно, у меня тоже очень много забот.... Но дьякон Далия пообещал обо всем позаботиться на время моего отсутствия, и я желаю ему верить. Сколько времени прошло с тех пор, как мы…
🐳8🕊8🆒7
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @BarbaraSun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 725,923 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@BarbaraSun named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝔅𝔞𝔯𝔟𝔞𝔯𝔞 — event” (@BarbaraSun), 30 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BarbaraSun.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.