Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FIITJEE AITS JEE TEST SERIES PAPERS

Channel

FIITJEE AITS JEE TEST SERIES PAPERS

@FIITJEE_PAPERS

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,598subscribers

+123 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001569940370
TypeChannel
Username@FIITJEE_PAPERS
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/FIITJEE_PAPERS

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@FIITJEE_PAPERS/17168 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 02:46 UTC@VMC_JEE_TEST_SERIES_PAPERS/839230 Jul 2026, 02:46 UTC1.00under a minute
@VMC_JEE_TEST_SERIES_PAPERS/839430 Jul 2026, 02:49 UTC@FIITJEE_PAPERS/17170 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 02:49 UTC1.00under a minute
@VMC_JEE_TEST_SERIES_PAPERS/839630 Jul 2026, 02:51 UTC@FIITJEE_PAPERS/17172 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 02:51 UTC1.00under a minute
@FIITJEE_PAPERS/17174 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 03:43 UTC@VMC_JEE_TEST_SERIES_PAPERS/83981 Aug 2026, 03:43 UTC1.00under a minute
@VMC_JEE_TEST_SERIES_PAPERS/84024 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC@FIITJEE_PAPERS/17178 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC1.00under a minute
@FIITJEE_PAPERS/17180 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 03:53 UTC@VMC_JEE_TEST_SERIES_PAPERS/84044 Aug 2026, 03:53 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@VMC_JEE_TEST_SERIES_PAPERS12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (75)
@SRI_CHAITNYA_JEE_PAPERS11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@SRI_CHAITNYA_JEE_PAPERS (65)
@NARAYANA_JEE_TEST_SERIES7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@NARAYANA_JEE_TEST_SERIES (52)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 16 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @FIITJEE_PAPERS — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

21,46321,59821,530.57 August 2026 — 21,475 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,484 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,485 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,480 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,484 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,474 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,463 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,475 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,478 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,464 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,469 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,473 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,477 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,483 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,486 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,481 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,489 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,508 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,514 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,521 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,533 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,534 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,539 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,537 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,547 subscribers6 September 2026 — 21,541 subscribers9 September 2026 — 21,575 subscribers11 September 2026 — 21,589 subscribers13 September 2026 — 21,597 subscribers17 September 2026 — 21,598 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 41 days, net +123. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,443–21,618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 11:1721,598+1
13 Sept 2026, 19:4121,597+8
11 Sept 2026, 23:5621,589+14
9 Sept 2026, 15:5821,575+34
6 Sept 2026, 06:3721,541-6
2 Sept 2026, 14:1821,547+10
1 Sept 2026, 12:3321,537-2
31 Aug 2026, 10:0521,539+5
30 Aug 2026, 13:1521,534+1
29 Aug 2026, 14:5921,533+12
28 Aug 2026, 12:5221,521+7
27 Aug 2026, 15:0521,514+6
26 Aug 2026, 13:1221,508+19
25 Aug 2026, 11:0321,489+8
24 Aug 2026, 08:4721,481-5
22 Aug 2026, 15:3921,486+3
21 Aug 2026, 09:2821,483+6
20 Aug 2026, 08:5321,477+4
19 Aug 2026, 10:5821,473+4
18 Aug 2026, 13:2221,469first reading

Engagement

74 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.38%
avg views ÷ 21,598 subscribers
Avg views / post
946
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.202%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 74 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held74 (28 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total13,237
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 14:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

90 reactions across 52 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4853.3%
2527.8%
🔥77.78%
💘33.33%
🥰33.33%
🎉22.22%
❤‍🔥11.11%
🤝11.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 02:52 UTC485 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Master JEE Advanced: Narayana Hitex Super Chaina Chapter-Wise Assignment Series Under 500 Rank Prep: Exclusive Narayana Hitex Super Chaina Advanced Problem Sets https://xtglinks.com/ghEVb https://xtglinks.com/ghEVb TUTORIAL

👍2

1 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC729 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

NARAYANA JEE ADVANCED CHAPTER WISE ASSIGNMENTS UNDER 500 RANKERS #IMP https://xtglinks.com/ghEVb https://xtglinks.com/ghEVb TUTORIAL

👍1

31 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC887 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

BICHKULE SIR'S PYQ'S BASED SHORT NOTES 🫶📍 🎖️PHYSICS | 🎖️CHEMISTRY | 🎖️MATH'S DIGITAL NOTES DOWNLOAD ⚠️ 👇 https://xtglinks.com/uPDTC https://xtglinks.com/uPDTC TUTORIAL Those Students Who Have Followed They have Gotten 99.% + Relevant Material Only 💯🚀 All PYQ'S Covered In Short Notes Kindly Checkout 🫰❤️‍🔥 IMP For Part Tests

👍2

31 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC727 viewsread 3 September 2026

FOR JEE ADVANCED PHYSICS UNDER 100 RANKS 🫶👇 ( Extra Stuffs) 🔮CHAPTER WISE ULTRA IMP SHEETS 🔮IIT JAM CHAPTER WISE HIGHLY RELEVENT QUESTIONS https://xtglinks.com/16wu https://xtglinks.com/16wu TUTORIAL

30 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC831 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

[ @bohring_bot | @HeyitsyashXD ] 30_08_26_INC_SR_IIT_STAR_CO_SCMODEL_A_JEE_ADV_2022_P_II_CTA_03_Q.pdf

2

30 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC825 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

[ @bohring_bot | @HeyitsyashXD ] 29-08-2026_Jr.Super60_ Nucleus BT_Jee-Main_WTM-18_Q.Paper.pdf

2

30 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC834 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

📚 Send your Sunday & Weekly Mock Test Papers & Schedules directly to @bohring_bot 🌼 💡 Join Exclusive Test Series Channels 🎟️ TAP HERE

🤝1

26 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,540 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

NARYANA PTM 05 | PTA 05 ASSIGNMENTS https://t.me/JEE_MAINS_JEE_ADVANCED_PAPERS/417 https://t.me/JEE_MAINS_JEE_ADVANCED_PAPERS/417

1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @FIITJEE_PAPERS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FIITJEE AITS For JEE Main+Advanced
@FIITJEE_AITS_for_JEE · 24,808
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 15 September 2026
NARAYANA JEE TEST SERIES PAPERS
@NARAYANA_JEE_TEST_SERIES · 37,086
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 1 September 2026
ALLEN JEE Official
@ALLENJEEofficial · 73,988
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 August 2026
JEE 2025: MathonGo Official Channel
@mathongo_2025 · 24,344
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 September 2026
JEE Full Study Material
@JEE_Full_Study_Material · 43,337
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 28 August 2026
Pw Prayas Arjuna Jee modules 2027
@Pw_Prayas_Arjuna_Jee_modules_139 · 29,813
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 September 2026
ALLEN Career Institute
@allencareerinstitute_official · 31,266
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 6 September 2026
Invisible Mechanics
@invisiblemechanics2022 · 22,137
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 21 September 2026
WE WON ACADEMY
@wewonacademy · 22,373
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 20 September 2026
Vora Classes
@voraclasses · 43,431
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 28 August 2026
IIT JEE Mains 2027 Notes
@JEE_2027_MATERIAL · 57,056
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 23 August 2026
Eduniti for Physics
@edunitimg · 164,506
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 12 August 2026
IIT JEE Mains 2027 Material
@IIT_JEE_MAINS_2027_MATERIAL · 48,944
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 26 August 2026
Science Adda247
@Adda247Science · 27,069
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 10 September 2026
Physics Galaxy
@physicsgalaxyworld · 121,997
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 28 August 2026
Vedantu JEE Made Ejee
@vedantumath1 · 114,898
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 14 August 2026
Vedantu JEE - Official
@VJEEOfficial · 23,235
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 September 2026
JEE SIMPLIFIED 🧠
@jeesimplified · 34,458
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 3 September 2026
Nishant Jindal [IITD]
@realNishantJindal · 35,666
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 1 September 2026
JEE Legends
@unacademyatoms · 28,309
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 9 September 2026
Class 12th CBSE Boards
@Class12thCBSE_Boards · 45,199
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 27 August 2026
Chemistry Handwritten Notes ™
@NEET_Chemistry_Notes_Class_11_12 · 46,315
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 28 August 2026
JEE Nexus
@JEEnexus · 54,520
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 August 2026
Iit Jee Mains Advance Materials
@IIT_JEE_Mains_Advance_Materials · 93,426
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FIITJEE AITS JEE TEST SERIES PAPERS” (@FIITJEE_PAPERS), 21,598 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FIITJEE_PAPERS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.