If anybody has got CSVTU in there counselling then they can reach out to me.
Signed (โ'โก'โ)โ โฐ โสษงรฏลรคส $ษฆโสสรฃ โ(โ'โก'โ)

Channel
@MathsQOTD
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
2,735subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001614042451 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MathsQOTD |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MathsQOTD |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 2,735 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 2,739 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 2,739 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 September 2024 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
180 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โก | 46 | 25.6% | |
| โค | 41 | 22.8% | |
| ๐ | 30 | 16.7% | |
| ๐ฅ | 29 | 16.1% | |
| ๐ | 18 | 10.0% | |
| ๐ข | 8 | 4.44% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 5 | 2.78% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 1.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 180reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2024 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
If anybody has got CSVTU in there counselling then they can reach out to me.
Signed (โ'โก'โ)โ โฐ โสษงรฏลรคส $ษฆโสสรฃ โ(โ'โก'โ)
Guys you can follow me here :- Linkedin - https://www.linkedin.com/in/maxprogrammer007/ Github - https://github.com/maxprogrammer007
๐ฅ4
Signed (โ'โก'โ)โ โฐ โสษงรฏลรคส $ษฆโสสรฃ โ(โ'โก'โ)
Why does the notations T=0, Tยฒ=SโขS_1, T=S_1 work for general conics??
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Isotropic Tetrahedron
A variable circle passes through the fixed point G(p,q) and touches the X-axis. The locus of the other end of the diameter passing through G is ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
โค3
Signed Isotropic Tetrahedron
JEE Mains shift?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
โค2
Signed Isotropic Tetrahedron
Hiii how are you guys doing
๐13๐ข7๐3โค1๐ฅ1
Signed .
An interesting relationship...... Join @MathsQOTD for more.....
โก19โค4๐1๐1๐ฅ1
Signed (โ'โก'โ)โ โฐ โสษงรฏลรคส $ษฆโสสรฃ โ(โ'โก'โ)
For JEE advanced aspirants..try this book.
๐4โก1โค1
Signed (โ'โก'โ)โ โฐ โสษงรฏลรคส $ษฆโสสรฃ โ(โ'โก'โ)
If you are well prepared in math for jee adv and want to expand your problem exposure have try to this book.. this was huge success last year. Share @MathsQOTD.
โก16โคโ๐ฅ5โค3๐3๐ฅ1
Signed (โ'โก'โ)โ โฐ โสษงรฏลรคส $ษฆโสสรฃ โ(โ'โก'โ)
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Ishan
Hey posting a math problem from Putnam competition*
๐7
Signed Suraj
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Ishan
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MathsQOTD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Why does the notations T=0, Tยฒ=SโขS_1, T=S_1 work for general conics??
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A variable circle passes through the fixed point G(p,q) and touches the X-axis. The locus of the other end of the diameter passing through G is ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
JEE Mains shift?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2024 to 8 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ฎ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ณ Wrestling With MATHS ๐ฎ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ณโ (@MathsQOTD), 2,735 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MathsQOTD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.