Channel
@ElonMuskPollution
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
40subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001856872862 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ElonMuskPollution |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ElonMuskPollution |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @ElonMuskBullshit/2947 Mar 2024, 02:00 UTC | @ElonMuskPollution/295 · this entry7 Mar 2024, 02:07 UTC | 1.00 | 7 minutes |
| @ElonMuskBullshit/3049 Mar 2024, 17:49 UTC | @ElonMuskPollution/305 · this entry9 Mar 2024, 17:49 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ElonMuskBullshit/3059 Mar 2024, 17:49 UTC | @ElonMuskPollution/306 · this entry9 Mar 2024, 17:49 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ElonMuskPollution/309 · this entry13 Mar 2024, 00:44 UTC | @ElonMuskBullshit/30813 Mar 2024, 00:44 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ElonMuskPollution/310 · this entry29 Mar 2024, 17:08 UTC | @ElonMuskBullshit/30929 Mar 2024, 17:09 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ElonMuskPollution/320 · this entry29 Mar 2024, 17:42 UTC | @ElonMuskBullshit/31929 Mar 2024, 17:42 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @ElonMuskBullshit | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | even |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 7 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 March 2024 to 1 March 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @ElonMuskBullshit. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:49 | 40 | +1 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 39 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 40 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 41 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 40 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 41 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 41 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 40 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 7 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Die Kreuzfahrtbranche boomt und verzeichnet so viele Passagiere wie nie zuvor. Allein in Deutschland buchten 2,23 Millionen Menschen einen Ozeantrip https://perma.cc/D4HY-FABK The cruise industry is booming and has more passengers than ever before. In Germany alone, 2.23 million people booked an ocean trip, an increase of three percent compared to the previous year. LNG Cruises are NOT polluting free cruises! https…
In 2019 AIDA Cruises once again took a technological leap into cruises emissions neutral by commissioning AIDAnova, the world's first LNG-powered cruise ship, which received the Blue Angel seal from the German federal government in recognition of its design of environmentally friendly ship. Thanks to the new design of the ship, the use of LNG and other measures to reduce energy consumption in the sectors of the hote…
Account banned or not, one thing is sure ELON MUSK IS POLLUTING OUR PLANET! by - destroying 🌳 https://t.me/ElonMuskPollution/305 https://t.me/ElonMuskPollution/306 https://t.me/ElonMuskPollution/295 - ✈️ everywhere for every shit! or 🛥 https://t.me/ElonMuskPollution/224 https://t.me/ElonMuskPollution/144 https://t.me/ElonMuskPollution/175 https://t.me/ElonMuskPollution/54 https://t.me/ElonMuskPollution/78 THAT IS …
STOP BUILDING THINGS LIKE SHIT! Part 2 Part 1 https://t.me/MissionPlaneta/91 Stop that Migros, Coop, Lidl, Aldi create no sense 4 x 1-2 floors shopping center instead OF JUST CREATE A BIG SHOPPING CENTER WITH 5-10 FLOORS! Stop to create 10000x shopping center one near the other! PEOPLE GO SHOPPING 1-2x PRO WEEK or even less! NOT every 3 hours in all centers! Like this shit to keep them open during weekend ... 🤦♂️…
Well, let we update the previous post to make it clear our point of view We don't mean that EVERY 🛣 PROJECT IS OK! 💩 projects should be banned! https://t.me/MissionPlaneta/62 https://t.me/MissionPlaneta/60 Exactly like the shit done in Norway! https://t.me/IsraelPollution/362 Like we said https://t.me/GreenBullshit/8 to https://t.me/GreenBullshit/24 we need to check + and - and compare that with the indirect poll…
Well Elon Musk, a) what they did with the trees is perfectly fine! THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO KEEP TREES SAFE! if there is no damage with 💣 or whatever! Meanwhile let we remember that PEOPLE WORKING FOR THE GOVERNMENT ARE THE FIRST CRIMINALS! https://t.me/AnimalFreaks/2601 https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/128 All those idiots that approve no sense building projects should be fired! https://t.me/GreenBullshit/10 https…
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @ElonMuskPollution. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 44 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Elon Musk / SpaceX / Tesla / ElonJet / Private Jets Yachts Facts about Pollution and Climate Change” (@ElonMuskPollution), 40 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ElonMuskPollution.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.