Channel
@CarAccidentsFacts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
40subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001968914200 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CarAccidentsFacts |
| Description | This channel is based on the @TheBorderlineTelegram story - A project by @DefenceTelegram @CountriesFreaks @GenRevolutionOfficial @RoadToPetabyte @PlanetFreaks @DisasterFreaks @TgmeFreaks |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CarAccidentsFacts |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 40 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 40 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 25 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 7 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Such people who is parking in a tunnel? 1) PRISON! 2) HUGE FINES! 3) SUCH DUDE CANNOT DRIVE/ OWN / BUY / RENT ANY CAR ANYMORE! or other similar things! SUCH DUDE CANNOT DRIVE ANYMORE! Do you need to go somewhere? Take a bus, tram, taxi, train or whatever! More safety and LESS POLLUTION TOO! https://t.me/LawsTelegram/105 4) Obviously such dude would lose the driving license for LIFE! but this is NOT important! be…
The future are not electric cars! https://t.me/ElonMuskPollution/272 https://t.me/ElonMuskPollution/187 https://t.me/ElonMuskPollution/188 The future are not airplanes! https://t.me/ElonMuskPollution/57 https://t.me/ElonMuskPollution/144 https://t.me/ElonMuskPollution/175 https://t.me/ElonMuskPollution/203 THE FUTURE ARE HIGH SPEED TRAINS! https://t.me/PollutionFacts/898 https://t.me/EnergyFactsTelegram/509 https:/…
So BE LESS IDIOT! During night LOW YOUR SPEED! in respect for animals! and humans! https://t.me/CarAccidentsFacts/257 https://t.me/CarAccidentsFacts/317 During winter LOW YOUR SPEED! and don't do shit! During a storm LOW YOUR SPEED! During rain LOW YOUR SPEED! "You can do that", BUT DON'T TAKE GOVERNMENTS MONEY TO FIX YOUR SHIT! or don't come here with so sorry! https://t.me/SoSorryTelegram Plus don't kill other…
Let we start from the basic, since PEOPLE ARE SO IDIOT NOT EVEN ABLE TO DRIVE IN A FUCKING 🔘 Backup by @CarAccidentsFacts A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
If you wish to ⚰️ due to your ignorance and thinking to be an expert but yes, everyone can think to be expert WHEN IN REALITY NO ONE IS EXPERT ❄️ WINS ALWAYS! Backup by @CarAccidentsFacts A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Yes ... sure ...
Between having things on the paper, and what really happens, THERE IS AN HUGE DIFFERENCE!!!! Do 🇨🇭 respect speed limit? NOPE Do 🗻 people respect limit? They are the WORST PEOPLE EVER! Reason why such things happen https://t.me/CarAccidentsFacts/257 knowing exactly that driving in 🗻 is more dangerous! but they simply give a shit! until they ⚰️. Amen 🙏 without considering their shitty ideas about 🐺 wolf https://t.me…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @CarAccidentsFacts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 83,845 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The true facts behind car accidents, young drivers crash, the influence of social media on people and luxury cars” (@CarAccidentsFacts), 40 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CarAccidentsFacts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.