Channel
@ENCESTRAL
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
265subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002085593635 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ENCESTRAL |
| Description | ( ── 𔒱 – ⚰ ) The interminable eupathy that sustenance embezzles by minutiae of orange spectral linearity of bypass becoming a mutualisme partner, a torus of tragic reprieve in repcrevel invitation with @MoonEncestral @Encestralbot |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ENCESTRAL |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 265 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 265 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 17 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2024 to 27 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Embermoon Of ENCESTRAL. pinned «ANNOUNCEMENT. Due to our occupation situation. We are delighted to announce that @ENCESTRAL peforce to take a rest for a while (Hiatus). Starting from today, we will not accepting HFW and SFS thingy. To align with this chance, we kindly request all mutuals…»
ANNOUNCEMENT. Due to our occupation situation. We are delighted to announce that @ENCESTRAL peforce to take a rest for a while (Hiatus). Starting from today, we will not accepting HFW and SFS thingy. To align with this chance, we kindly request all mutuals do not unsubscribe from this channel. We apologize for any inconvenience cause and hopefully this information can reach all corners. We extend our heartfelt grati…
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
#SpectacularRora
ㅤㅤ The girl stylishly walked across tables full of pellucid glasses that reflected her loveliness. The glasses were divulge and saw two girls who were simultaneously and tittle-tattle about something. ˖ ׁ 𓂂ㅤ°ㅤ˖ ׁ 𓂂ㅤㅤ♡ "Gossip girl" 💃🏻 is tangible here. Scalding twaddle of #SpectacularRora, marking Rora's Birthday on August 14th awaits! 𖣁 The pages began to appear as to what would happen that day. The gleaming a…
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ ﹙ .. 🕸 | Verses from the Heart's Sanctuary ﹚ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ⸼ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ⸼ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ⸼ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤWould be twirl in abounding of unfold the gleefully. Shines that shout cause it comings I would to stay and make it inked // endurings days. Overflowings to accompany today’s memorable day that we can captured. ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ••• ㅤㅤWe truly appreciate when our souls become bound as one, intertwined in a profound connection. I feel truly…
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
#10YearsWithRedVelvet
ㅤ ㅤㅤ (‘PLATEAUS OF AUGUST’) : REMEMBRANCE DAY ── ·· 👻 ·· RED VELVET’S REVELRY ·· 👻 ·· ── ㅤㅤ 𝐅𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡, 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐦𝐢𝐝𝐬𝐭 𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 ㅤㅤ 𝐟𝐮𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐥𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐭 ㅤㅤ 𝐫𝐡𝐲𝐭𝐡𝐦𝐢𝐜𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐠𝐞𝐮𝐬𝐞, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐦 ㅤㅤ 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐮𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐲𝐦𝐩𝐡𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬: ㅤㅤ 🌲 ··· #10YearsWithRedVelvet ··· 🌲 ㅤ ㅤㅤ
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ENCESTRAL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 782,472 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ENCESTRAL named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Embermoon Of ENCESTRAL.” (@ENCESTRAL), 265 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ENCESTRAL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.