Hi, Punkies. Come and celebrate our 10th Anniversary. A decade with BLACKPINK! 🖤🩷

Channel
PINKPUNK.
@PlNKPUNK
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
188subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001417661540 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PlNKPUNK |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PlNKPUNK |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 188 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 191 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 191 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 2 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 26.5%
- avg views ÷ 188 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 49.8
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (2 January 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 199 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 83.3% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 January 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
https://t.me/BLACKPINKYGE/125
ㅤ #10thWithBLACKPINK A never-ending hostility has such a massive vestige on an environment that’s spiraling out of control. ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎WHATEVER IS CRUMBLING ︎ ︎ ︎CRUMBLES EVEN WORSE. ────────────────── 𓆰 𝟏𝟎𝐭𝐡 °˖➴ 𓆪 #ADecadeWithBLACKPINK WHATEVER IS PROSPEROUS GETS GLORIFIED EVER MORE. A burg shaped by ego and pleonexia, where everything is intermingled together, concocting a …
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ BETWIXT SABLE IRIDESCENCE, &. ROSEATE INCANDOR. ৡ (COUNTDOWN TO DEADLINE.) Hourglass engorged beneath preserves a solitary granule of chronal residue aloft for irrevocable consummation beyond recall. Celestial divertissement phosphoresces through obsidian silhouette and shining quadruped glamour. Beauty Hits the Chorus in Fu…
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ Prismatized crescendo detonates into chroma pulsewave with synthetic density. Four iridescent figures rupture the skyline as bassfracture tremors ricochet without destabilizing their calibrated brilliance. Tempo-wired cadence combusts into relentless momentum toward long-anticipated ignition point. Mirrorball descent beyond liquid luminance accelerates euphoric overdrive in chroma-splintered escalation. Februar…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Paguy tua ya ini
Oh.... hi 2026, been here since 2021 🥱
❤2
I saw some AI generated photos of BP members on pinterest today. While they can be visually interesting, I want to emphasize the importance of authenticity in our roleplay community. Let's be mindful and refrain from using any AI-generated images to portray BLACKPINK. Thanks! ❤️
❤8🔥2
PINKPUNK. pinned «We'd love to politely declare that we won’t tolerate any paguyubans or person for using or creating any designs that are similar to ours. In other words, we do expect people to respect our masterpiece without being inspired, go get your own.»
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @PlNKPUNK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 138,062 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Chaenglithe · 162 posts𝗥𝗢𝗖𝗘𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗬.
@rocelity · 362 postsArsip AmourPink.
@AmmourPink · 11 postPARTO's Archive.
@arsipanparto · 51 postArsip Gustu.
@ArsipGustu · 11 postArchives Astéri neh bosht!!!!
@AsteriArchives · 21 postOcom <8
@BlossomArchive · 51 postCropsy Archive
@Cropsyve · 21 post𝓓𝑒 𝓝𝑎𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑎
@DeNarnia · 61 post𝗚𝗙𝗖 𝗟𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗼𝗼𝗺 🗃
@GFClockers · 31 postHanzo’s archive
@HanzosArchive · 21 postMajem Archive.
@jemfile · 31 post#MeetFeztive THE MEMORIES
@MeetFeztive · 61 postarsip hkc
@mengtilipun · 21 postarsip panju
@PanjuArchive · 31 postPaseung's archive
@paseungarchive · 31 post𝐒𝐄𝐊𝐈𝐓𝐙𝐘
@sekitzy · 81 postSere9 Archive's </3
@Sere9Archive · 11 postarcip
@spillchateens · 21 postARSIP MATA YANG BARU
@SpillEyezone · 21 post⟠˚₊· 𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐅𝐥𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐨𝐦: 𝑩𝑳𝑰𝑵𝑲 ꒱◌ུ·₊˚
@StardomBLINK · 1871 post𝐺𝑙𝑜𝑤-𝑜𝑛'𝑠
@theglowon · 11 postThe President ; High School mystery club
@thepresiedent · 251 postYUJINY.
@TheYujiny · 91 postTrenative (yhaa disband)
@Trenative · 41 postStorage.
@twiceteensavest · 21 post𝗩𝗢𝗟𝗜𝗡𝗘 𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗡𝗘𝗦
@volinestones · 111 postarchive
@yerinarchive · 21 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 61 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@ArdoreMemories · 213 postsSTREET DREAM
@StreetDreaam · 115 posts-
@MansionTreasure · 194 postsBELLÉNEUX.
@Belleneux · 33 postsBLΛƆKPIИK.
@BLACKPINKYGE · 643 postsWonrous Archive
@SpillWonrous · 73 posts⟠˚₊· 𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐅𝐥𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐨𝐦: 𝑩𝑳𝑰𝑵𝑲 ꒱◌ུ·₊˚
@StardomBLINK · 1873 postsMadame of Conflagrants, AEPINK.
@AEPlNK · 742 postsHanzo’s archive
@HanzosArchive · 22 postsThe Hall of Xianyu: Lóuzhen Lingxiu
@HeavenOfLouzhen · 7,8072 posts𝗥𝗢𝗖𝗘𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗬.
@rocelity · 362 postsRojen Archive.
@RojenFiles · 72 postsTHE CHOUREN STEAKHOUSE : The Recipe Never Leaves This House.
@TheChouren · 2,0522 postsThe Mirthful; 𝐑𝐮𝐛𝐲𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐡.
@therubyseth · 3982 postsPARTO's Archive.
@arsipanparto · 51 postBeauxbatons’ Memorandum
@Beauxarchives · 61 post𝗛𝗲𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘆 𝗼’ 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗺𝗶𝘀.
@Hethemis · 2091 postNCTPINK. 𐂡
@NCTPIINK · 21 post𝗢𝗯𝘀𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝗲𝗹𝗰𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗵.
@Obscouth · 791 postPINKSCAPE
@PlNKSCAPE · 41 postThe Goddesses, Reveluv.
@TheGoddessesRV · 111 post𝐑etrouvailles
@TheRetrouvailles · 261 post𝑅𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘺𝘯﹔ Veiled in Empyreal Splendor.
@TheRosethyn · 41 postYUJINY.
@TheYujiny · 91 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Belleneux · 33 postsBLΛƆKPIИK.
@BLACKPINKYGE · 643 postsEXPINK.
@Expinks · 263 postsNIEROSY (Free Unsubs.)
@nierosy · 9673 postsBARBSÉ: BRATTY DOLLS.
@barbsee · 52 postsWHISPERS OF HULM: SADEMIRE.
@sademire · 1222 posts⟠˚₊· 𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐅𝐥𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐨𝐦: 𝑩𝑳𝑰𝑵𝑲 ꒱◌ུ·₊˚
@StardomBLINK · 1872 posts🂱 ˒ WYSTAGE: ”Crowns” of Assemblage.
@WYSTAGE · 762 postsLovesome dwelling, Blackpink.
@BIackpink · 221 postThe Calsearth Ledger: Ales of The Old World
@Calsearth · 14,3421 post[CLOSE SFS] ELDRAETH: Ebon Swan's Eternal Manor.
@eldraeth · 9,2501 postHouse of Letheris: Sanctuary of Lotus-Tinted Quiet.
@HouseOfLetheris · 9,9111 post𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐉𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫: 𝑺𝒄𝒓𝒊𝒑𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝑳𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒄𝒚.
@Jencluster · 2311 postJennie's Bday!
@JenniesBDay · 331 postLethal-Oath: Ballad & Banish.
@LethalOath · 6411 postTHE FUEL, @rJakeh: CLOSE BENERAN
@rJakeh · 4641 postRwwanda.
@Rwwanda · 31 postSaintly Stunners "which symbolizes beauty and elegance."
@SaintlyStunners · 551 post𝑅𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘺𝘯﹔ Veiled in Empyreal Splendor.
@TheRosethyn · 41 postThe Vaughns.
@TheVaughns · 5401 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PINKPUNK.” (@PlNKPUNK), 188 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PlNKPUNK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.