Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
Les Prodiges Masquées: Château de Lenoir.
@ChateauDeLenoir
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,068subscribers
-35 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002104851052 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ChateauDeLenoir |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ChateauDeLenoir |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 2,068 | -14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 2,082 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 2,090 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 2,102 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 2,103 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 31 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
90 reactions across 6 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 31.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 15.6% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 8.89% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 8.89% | |
| 💋 | 7 | 7.78% | |
| 🐳 | 6 | 6.67% | |
| ☃ | 5 | 5.56% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 5.56% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 4.44% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 3.33% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2025 to 17 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ㅤ 📜 : Embrace the enchanting worldʼs celebration shrouded in secrecy concealed ㅤ identities hidden behind alluring masks Amidst the dazzling glow of lights amidst a myriad of perplexing personas, the aristocrat announces the auspicious date to the jubilant souls with melodious tributes dedicated to @TheVaughns @Encestral @TheHansley @RockstarTaesan @Larousee @TheHalton @Sethlore @Wonrouss @Glacieralf @TheGalstei…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤1
morning, kwasong! how i look todayy? it's really freezing today. with cherry blossoms behind me 🌸
❤🔥6❤3🍓3🔥3🥰3🌚2💘2⚡1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ChateauDeLenoir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 399,453 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@TheOddlyNeighbour · 943 postsDrysdale’s Repository.
@drysdaIe · 141 postTimeless Elegance: A Legacy Of Couture.
@ENCouturee · 1,1261 postInsights from Lawlidge’s Archives.
@Lawlidge · 21 postMaknae Authority
@MaknaeZone · 271 postMonsVity's Timeline
@MonstaXCravity · 131 postDrowned Child's Fantasy, The Rauleigh.
@RauIeigh · 191 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 33 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@IVELady · 40020 posts[DISBAND] Dwelling The Heart of Osteria
@HeartOfOsteria · 17316 postsArchieve of Osteria
@OsteriaPlace · 115 postsKwangerine's Notepad
@Kwangerinotes · 19 postsAeternals’ Universe of Conflux Dimension.
@Aeteernals · 147 postsVilens' Keepsakes.
@Vilensians · 177 postsThe Hefflins’ Archives of Affection (and Confusion).
@Hefflins · 233 postsMemory of Gishlaine
@MansionOfGhislaine · 7183 postsLodge of Canine and Feline: ✱ The Caltbern.
@Caltbern · 7,1902 posts[DISBAND] Freedom Through the Realms Whispers: Guild of Clardforge.
@Clardforge · 4,1072 postsEGO CHEMIST
@egochemist · 3022 postsDISBAND
@LinchwyldFamillie · 782 postsMirthvelune's
@Mirthvelune · 252 posts𝕽𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘦 o𝙵 𝕬𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘺 ✶ 𝓣𝚘𝚐𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚕 𝔗𝚘𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚘𝚠
@ReverieOfAmity · 6,4772 postsLers
@Rusttler · 272 postsSYNK-NET NEWS.
@SYNKNET · 12 postsThe Codex Of Clovendorf.
@Clovendorfs · 91 postDrysdale’s Repository.
@drysdaIe · 141 postTimeless Elegance: A Legacy Of Couture.
@ENCouturee · 1,1261 postInsights from Lawlidge’s Archives.
@Lawlidge · 21 postLuevine’s Adventure Book.
@LuevineRepository · 301 postWishing Star, Enchanted: Monster Wishers.
@MonsterWishers · 7941 postForever Young, THE ODDLY NEIGHBOUR.
@TheOddlyNeighbour · 941 postMonsWish’s Chronicle.
@Wishlanders · 51 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Delmeist · 5,3601 postEmbermoon Of ENCESTRAL.
@ENCESTRAL · 2621 postkeep
@Glacieralf · 51 postLADY IN RED: LAROUSEE SIZZLE.
@Larousee · 1,1751 postThe Chrono Refuge, MONSVITY. #JourneyWithAllen
@MONSVITY · 1,3701 post𝗥𝗢𝗖𝗞𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗥 𝗧𝗔𝗘𝗦𝗔𝗡: The Echoes Between Rhythm Of Music & Sounds #B-TIMES.
@RockstarTaesan · 1,1281 postSethlore: The Bleaching Hour
@Sethlore · 5,9081 postWhispers Of The Regency: The Austeense.
@TheAusteense · 1,0121 postTheGalstein
@TheGalstein · 41 postFiery Circus Ringmaster: The Halton.
@TheHalton · 9,6031 postPeanuts Make Some Noise: Rehearse a Little, Ta-Da Later! at Hansley Household.
@TheHansley · 5,1941 postThe HimmeFiern : Beyond of Timeless Journey.
@TheHimmeFiern · 1,2411 postThe Vaughns.
@TheVaughns · 5341 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ChateauDeLenoir named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Les Prodiges Masquées: Château de Lenoir.” (@ChateauDeLenoir), 2,068 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChateauDeLenoir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.