فلا ظُهورَ إلاّ بعد إذن الله تعالى ذِكرُهُ وذلك بعد طول الأمد وقسوةِ القلوب وامتلاء الأرضِ جَوْراَ .. - الإمام المهدي عجل الله فرجه .

Channel
ستوري الـ سيلا
@EFSBOS
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
101,194subscribers
-413 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002124700392 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EFSBOS |
| Description | - بعـدها عيـونك احلـى عيـون بعيـوني . ————— - آقتباسات - آفتاࢪ • —————- ° للاعلانات وتمويل $ : @Z00_17 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EFSBOS |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 101,194 | -81 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 101,275 | -99 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 101,374 | -97 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 101,471 | -107 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:42 | 101,578 | -29 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 101,607 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 336
- Videos
- 68
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 27s
- Average length
- 27s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 183
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 5
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
- Most on one post
- 56
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @EFSBOS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 November 2024 to 3 January 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
'' ويأتيك جبر من الله يُنسيكَ متاعب أيامك ''
'' وأجعلنيّ خيراً لِنفّسي ولِمن حوليّ يا الله ''
✨ عندما نُصــــــــلح علاقتنا مع اللّٰه سيُـصلح اللّٰه لنا كل شيء ✨
🦋
Photo, posted without a caption
{أَمَّن يُجِيبُ الْمُضْطرَّ إذَا دّعَاهُ وَيَكْشِفُ السُّوءَ}
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EFSBOS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 251,076 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@iaaaaa · 687,865
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 August 2026
@en_wk · 1,024,669
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 August 2026
@XXX8Z · 262,198
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
@zr_dt · 304,947
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 10 August 2026
@vv1996 · 235,239
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
@PVTNFS · 625,020
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
@English_Hanan1 · 208,763
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
@en3_g · 378,341
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
@hwjeki · 911,830
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 8 August 2026
@EN_QE · 845,757
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 8 August 2026
@PP_02 · 368,294
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 10 August 2026
@zzzxx · 434,208
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ستوري الـ سيلا” (@EFSBOS), 101,194 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EFSBOS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.