Channel
@Daftarcheh_info
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002196698863 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Daftarcheh_info |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Daftarcheh_info |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 16 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 18 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:09 | 18 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 9 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (9 April 2025 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 77 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
9 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 33.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2025 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
کانالهای زیادی با موضوعات بسیار مهمی هست که دوست دارم راهاندازی کنم، اما متأسفانه بهدلیل محدودیتهایی که دارم، خیلی از آنها را از دست میدهم. محیط کانال «دفترچه» هم، چون مثل وبسایتها و وبلاگها قابلیت موضوعبندی و دستهبندی محتوا را ندارد، این امکان را که مخاطب بتواند بهراحتی به یک موضوع خاص دسترسی پیدا کند، چندان فراهم نمیکند. یکی از آن موضوعات مهم که بهنظرم واقعاً نیاز عقیدتی و فکری جامعهٔ ماست و بهصورت…
Sticker, posted without a caption
علاوه بر موضوعات عقیده، زهد، حجاب، پاکدامنی و غیرت، بدعت و سنت، اهمیت و لزوم توجه به منابع شرع، خوارج و مسألهٔ تکفیر بیضابطه و... (که نیاز فکری جامعه به شمار میروند و احتمالاً متوجه شدید الحمدلله همچنان و بهتدریج در حال تکمیل شدن مستندات هستند)، از امروز انشاءالله به یک موضوع دیگهای هم پرداخته خواهد شد؛ موضوع موسیقی، حرام یا حلال بودنش، بررسی ادعای چیزی به نام «موسیقی اسلامی!» و موارد مرتبط، آن هم بر اساس قرآن (…
❤1
🍃 کانال نشر تلاوتهای إدریس أبکر 💡(ان شاء الله) سریعاً بروزرسانی و تکمیل میشود. @Idrees_Abkar_Tilawat | إدریس أبکر
❤1
دوست ندارم این پیام رو بدم و شاید هم اصلاً اونجاها (که حقیقتاً از هرنظر بدم میاد) فعالیت نکنم؛ امّا (با این وضعیت غیر قابل انتظار) همدیگه رو اگه خواستیم، بتونیم پیدا کنیم: "خط نوشته" در پیامرسانِ روبیکا: rubika.ir/khatneveshteh_tch "خط نوشته" در پیامرسانِ بله: http://ble.ir/khatneveshteh_tch "خط نوشته" در پیامرسانِ سروش: https://splus.ir/khatneveshteh_tch حسینعمرزاده
❤🔥1
یکی از مشکلات اعتماد به خدمات سرویس داخلی! احتمالاً بهزودی سایت را از دست خواهیم داد. ما به جهت صرفهجویی در هزینهها و… برای مدیریت محتوای سایت دفترچه، از سرور و فضای مدیریت شرکت بیان استفاده میکردیم که ظاهراً قرار هست منحل بشه! و چون متأسفانه فعلاً به لحاظ مالی و… شرایط فراهم نیست، ناچاریم تا مدتی (انشاءالله نه خیلی زیاد) سایت را نداشته باشیم و فقط از طریق رسانههای اجتماعی (و با اولویت کانال تلگرام) فعا…
❤1
این مجوز ما یعنی در مواقعی معدود که هدف نشرِ خیر باشه؛ نه اینکه، پناه بر خدا، طوری وانمود بشه که اون نوشتهها اثر و محصولِ استعدادِ خودِ شخص هست. این دوتا کاملاً از هم جداست و بهراحتی میشه تشخیص داد. و نباید این تساهلِ ما (تهیهکنندگان محتوا) بهگونهای باشه که زمینهٔ بیاخلاقیِ علمی برای عدهای تأیید یا مهیا بشه. اصلاً خیلی زشته و نباید تذکر داد؛ من خودم هم واقعاً درک نمیکنم اینکه یه مطلبی رو از هرجا که کپی می…
🥰1
دامنهٔ مطالبی که مورد علاقه و پسند من است ــ از انواع صوتیات و ویدئوها گرفته تا تصاویر و متون کوتاه و بلند و دیگر مواردــ بسیار گستردهتر از محتوایی است که در کانال «دفترچه» با شما عزیزان به اشتراک میگذارم. از همین رو، مدتی است به این فکر افتادهام که فضای مستقل دیگری هم ایجاد کنم و آن را به انتشار این دست از محتواهای مورد علاقهام اختصاص بدهم؛ محتواهایی که، انشاءالله، به آنها یقین دارم خیر، مفید و ثمربخشاند. و…
دوستان، یک خواهشی دارم از خدمتتون، بهخصوص اساتید، طلاب و علمای محترم: هر وقت اشتباهی در محتوای کانال دیدید، لطفاً علاوه بر ریپلای کردن در کانال خودتون، حداقل از طریق دایرکت به ادمین هم اطلاع بدید. ممکنه تا وقتی به کانال شما سر بزنم، از زمان نشر محتوا خیلی گذشته باشه. مطمئن هم باشید به هیچعنوان—انشاءالله— اهل حاشیههای پوچ و حقیری مثل داشتن غرور و علاقه به جدل و اصرار بر اشتباه و... نیستیم و چنانچه متوجه خطام…
👍1
📎 فضای نشر و دعوت، نه بازار گاهی پیامهایی از سوی ادمینهای برخی کانالها دریافت میکنم با این مضمون که «حاضر به تبادل هستید؟». پاسخ من معمولاً با تشکر آغاز میشود و بعد توضیح میدهم که کانالشان را میبینم و اگر بنا به ملاحظاتم مقدور باشد، انشاءالله معرفی خواهم کرد؛ اما این معرفی هرگز معامله و بدهبستان نخواهد بود. بعضیها این نکته را درمییابند، اما متأسفانه درصد بالایی اصلاً منظور را متوجه نمیشوند. اول از هم…
از آنجا که در «دفترچه» دربارهی قدس و به طور کلی هر آنچه با جهاد پیوند دارد، سخن بسیار برای گفتن داریم، کانال «قدس ۵۵۱» راهاندازی شد. هرچند فعلاً فعالیت چشمگیری ندارد، اما انشاءالله دیر یا زود قطعاً به جریان خواهد افتاد.
بِسمِ الله... 🇵🇸 @QDS_551 | قُــدس
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Daftarcheh_info. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 896,242 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📢 اطلاعرسانی دفترچه” (@Daftarcheh_info), 16 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Daftarcheh_info.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.