Channel
@CryptoTradingLeaks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
733subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001171042989 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoTradingLeaks |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoTradingLeaks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 733 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 732 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 733 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 734 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 734 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 102 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
#rektfencer BITCOIN BOTTOM CHECKLIST Bear market: 10 months Drawdown from ATH: ~54% Whales added 270K #BTC in last 2 weeks 200D EMA reclaim: NOT YET Now Bitcoin is about to break the global downtrend. Almost every bottom signal is lining up. @CryptoTradingLeaks Share with your friends
🐝 Bitcoin got rejected from the resistance $65,200 so far #Klondike @CryptoTradingLeaks Share with your friends
#rektfencer BITCOIN BOTTOM CHECKLIST Bear market: 10 months Drawdown from ATH: ~54% Whales added 270K #BTC in last 2 weeks 200D EMA reclaim: NOT YET Now Bitcoin is about to break the global downtrend. Almost every bottom signal is lining up. @CryptoTradingLeaks Share with your friends
Last week Bitcoin outran the equity indices, absorbing an oil shock that left stocks flat and finishing ahead of both. That relative strength has faded. Bitcoin spent this week sliding while US and European stocks sat still, and the break came on Monday: from that session onward it has not been level with stocks again. Oil gave last week's spike back and ended the week the weakest of the four. One week of relative w…
#BTC/USDT ANALYSIS Bitcoin has broken out of the descending triangle with strong volume, signaling a bullish shift in momentum. Price is now moving in for a retest of the Ichimoku cloud and the broken trendline. A successful hold above these levels would confirm bullish continuation, watch price action closely. #Signal_Express @CryptoTradingLeaks Share with your friends
#US DOLLAR ANALYSIS The US Dollar is breaking down from the ascending triangle pattern, signaling potential weakness. A short-term rebound is still possible, but the Ichimoku cloud is acting as a strong resistance above. Sustained movement below the pattern would confirm further downside in the Dollar. Since DXY moves inversely to crypto, this setup could heavily impact upcoming market direction. #Signal_Express…
VIP MARKET UPDATE: $BTC ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ $BTC is right at the apex of a massive descending triangle from October, currently at 65,011. Over a year of squeeze, this is decision time. Break above 68,000 and this pushes toward 74,000 and 78,000 fast. Lose 63,000 and fresh lows open up hard. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ – Binance Killers® #Binance_Killers @CryptoTradingLeaks Share with your friends
US refiners have shifted away from Saudi oil: US imports of Saudi Arabian crude fell to zero in July, marking the first full month without imports since 1985, according to preliminary US government data. This marks a sharp reversal from March, when US refiners were purchasing more than 800,000 barrels of Saudi crude oil per day. This comes as US refiners sought alternative supplies after the closure of the Strait …
#SNX gave a break of the consolidation and formed the small range there too. Its a sign for short-selling but market is trying to sustaining at the bottom of the range. If it break the small range too (Blue Box) then get into the short positions too. @CryptoTradingLeaks Share with your friends
The wallets leaving at $64 K are the same ones that showed up at $120 K. Bought the euphoria, sold the fear. @CryptoTradingLeaks Share with your friends
Bitcoin network activity surged after the Coldcard firmware exploit, with active addresses rising to 0.98 million per day, the highest level since December 2024. 👉 This spike reflects fear-driven on-chain activity, as users moved funds and migrated wallets to improve security. The increase is an operational security response, not a sign of changing market sentiment or investor conviction. 🔒₿ #Crypto_Vip_Signals @C…
Crypto Fear & Greed Index is at 38 — Fear dominates the market. The crowd is still scared. @CryptoTradingLeaks Share with your friends
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoTradingLeaks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 551,869 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Trading Leaks” (@CryptoTradingLeaks), 733 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoTradingLeaks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.