Channel
@ThunderCatTrading
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
321subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001886251505 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ThunderCatTrading |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ThunderCatTrading |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:29 | 321 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 320 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 319 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 320 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:21 | 320 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 72 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
#BTC/USDT ANALYSIS Bitcoin is rebounding from the ascending triangle support trendline, maintaining a bullish structure. The Ichimoku cloud is acting as support, reinforcing current price strength. A confirmed breakout above the horizontal supply zone could trigger a strong upward rally. #Signal_Express @CryptoTradingLeaks Share with your friends
#decodejar #BTC_Update 1D History doesn’t repeat, but it rhymes. Looking at Bitcoin’s daily structure, the June 2022 capitulation phase lines up closely with the February 2026 price action. The pink box on the current chart shares clear structural similarities with both the blue and orange boxes from the previous cycle — same type of choppy consolidation after a sharp move, similar Supertrend behavior, and comparabl…
#F&G_index @CryptoTradingLeaks Share with your friends
#Bitcoin Spot ETF Flows Update (August 3–7, 2026) Bitcoin Spot ETFs recorded a strong net inflow of +$865.3 million over the past week. Key Highlights: • All five trading days closed positive • Strongest day: +$244.4 million on August 5 • BlackRock IBIT dominated with consistent large inflows (e.g. +$196.8M, +$170.3M, +$128.3M) • Fidelity FBTC also contributed solidly throughout the week • Grayscale GBTC showed alm…
#BTC Liquidation Heatmap (3D) High leverage liquidity.🧐🧐🧐 @CryptoTradingLeaks Share with your friends
#rektfencer BITCOIN BOTTOM CHECKLIST Bear market: 10 months Drawdown from ATH: ~54% Whales added 270K #BTC in last 2 weeks 200D EMA reclaim: NOT YET Now Bitcoin is about to break the global downtrend. Almost every bottom signal is lining up. @CryptoTradingLeaks Share with your friends
🐝 Bitcoin got rejected from the resistance $65,200 so far #Klondike @CryptoTradingLeaks Share with your friends
#rektfencer BITCOIN BOTTOM CHECKLIST Bear market: 10 months Drawdown from ATH: ~54% Whales added 270K #BTC in last 2 weeks 200D EMA reclaim: NOT YET Now Bitcoin is about to break the global downtrend. Almost every bottom signal is lining up. @CryptoTradingLeaks Share with your friends
Last week Bitcoin outran the equity indices, absorbing an oil shock that left stocks flat and finishing ahead of both. That relative strength has faded. Bitcoin spent this week sliding while US and European stocks sat still, and the break came on Monday: from that session onward it has not been level with stocks again. Oil gave last week's spike back and ended the week the weakest of the four. One week of relative w…
#BTC/USDT ANALYSIS Bitcoin has broken out of the descending triangle with strong volume, signaling a bullish shift in momentum. Price is now moving in for a retest of the Ichimoku cloud and the broken trendline. A successful hold above these levels would confirm bullish continuation, watch price action closely. #Signal_Express @CryptoTradingLeaks Share with your friends
#US DOLLAR ANALYSIS The US Dollar is breaking down from the ascending triangle pattern, signaling potential weakness. A short-term rebound is still possible, but the Ichimoku cloud is acting as a strong resistance above. Sustained movement below the pattern would confirm further downside in the Dollar. Since DXY moves inversely to crypto, this setup could heavily impact upcoming market direction. #Signal_Express…
VIP MARKET UPDATE: $BTC ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ $BTC is right at the apex of a massive descending triangle from October, currently at 65,011. Over a year of squeeze, this is decision time. Break above 68,000 and this pushes toward 74,000 and 78,000 fast. Lose 63,000 and fresh lows open up hard. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ – Binance Killers® #Binance_Killers @CryptoTradingLeaks Share with your friends
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ThunderCatTrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Trading Leaks” (@ThunderCatTrading), 321 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ThunderCatTrading.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.