Channel
@CoronaSolution
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,195subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001311405246 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CoronaSolution |
| Created | 2 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CoronaSolution |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 2,195 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 2,197 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:40 | 2,198 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 2,197 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 2,197 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,065 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇩🇰👫💉🦠Dänische Experten überprüfen Strategie zur COVID-19-Impfung von Kindern nach Entschädigungsfällen In Dänemark ist eine erneute Debatte entbrannt, nachdem hochrangige Ärzte und Virologen die Impfpolitik des Landes gegen COVID-19 für Kinder angesichts der Entschädigungszahlungen an Kinder mit anerkannten Impfschäden öffentlich in Frage gestellt haben. Nach Angaben des dänischen öffentlich-rechtlichen Senders DR …
Die Befreiung des Göttlichen Institutioneller Missbrauch betrifft auch das negative Menschenbild, das die Kirchen seit Jahrtausenden zeichnen. Kirchenaustritte sind in Deutschland auf einem historisch hohen Niveau. Gründe hierfür sind eine fehlende Missbrauchsaufarbeitung, Vertrauensverlust und eine allgemeine Säkularisierung. Die Abkehr vom Institutionellen betrifft die katholische und die evangelische Kirche gle…
🇪🇺🇦🇹"Laien" im Parlament und im Bundestag - Erinnerung - Österreich: Spitzenkandidatin der Grünen für die EU-Wahl 2024 kannte EU-Mitgliedsstaaten nicht Lena Schilling war Spitzenkandidatin der Grünen für die EU-Wahl 2024. 🇩🇪Ähnlich sah es in Deutschland aus: Emilia Fester (Ex-MdB, Grüne und Ex-Pornodarstellerin) wusste nicht, dass Bismarck Kanzler war, ihr war er anscheinend nur als Hering bekannt. Sie setzt sich f…
Enteignung - LINKE finden das selbstverständlich https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/article/berlins-neue-brandmauer-enteignungsplaene-der-linken-verschrecken-spd-gruene-10269963 Wer immer noch nicht verstanden hat, dass die LINKE das DDR-Regime wieder etablieren möchte, koste es, was es wolle, ob mit oder ohne Gewalt, ob mit oder gegen den Willen der Bevölkerung, der hat die Gefahr dieser Politiker noch nicht richtig a…
In Europa spielt die Zukunftsmusik, ... ... wenn es um Gesundheit, Sicherheit und zunehmend unseres gesamten Lebens angeht. Zu wenig Menschen haben das erkannt, so dass eine Europawahl nur unter geringer Beteiligung stattfindet und die Politiker dort eigentlich noch zahnloser als im deutschen Parlament sind. Die EU-Kommission macht offensichtlich einfach das, was sie will und das EU-Parlament verkommt zu einem Puppe…
🇪🇺Dr. Kurt E. Müller, Umweltmediziner (K.E.M. Netzwerk) Das Melanom: Gibt es mehr als nur UV-Strahlung als Risikofaktor? — QS24.tv Beim Thema Hautkrebs wird häufig vor allem über Sonneneinstrahlung gesprochen. Doch es gibt auch Diskussionen über weitere mögliche Einflussfaktoren, die in der Forschung untersucht werden. 💡 In diesem Video erfährst du, warum unter anderem Quecksilber als möglicher Faktor diskutiert wi…
🥦🥕🍲Mikrowellen (Militär): Unter der Lupe, auch in der Küche Strahlungsbelastung, Nährstoffverlust + Gesundheitsgefahr Mikrowellenöfen in Russland wurden 1976 aufgrund negativer Auswirkungen auf Gesundheit verboten. In d. 90ern wurde d. Verbot fälschlicherweise wieder aufgehoben. Mikrowellengekochte Lebensmittel 60-90% ihres Nährwerts + werden mit 2,4 GHz-Strahlung behandelt. Beschleunigung strukturellen Zerfalls d…
🌿Krebs natürlich heilen Interview mit Dr. med. Karl J. Probst. Welche Rolle spielt Krebs in Deinem Leben? Hast Du bereits Angehörige oder geliebte Menschen an ihn verloren, oder bist Du selbst betroffen? Was wissen wir wirklich über dieses Schreckgespenst, das als Diagnose Angst und Panik verbreitet und gleichzeitig als Milliardengeschäft höchst umstritten ist?! Ist es anmaßend zu behaupten, Krebs wäre auf natürlic…
Nicolas Hulscher MPH Die CIA stufte in den 1950er Jahren eine sowjetische Studie als geheim ein, die zeigte, dass Antiparasitika das Krebswachstum hemmen, und hielt sie über ein halbes Jahrhundert lang unter Verschluss. Eine ganze Generation der Krebsforschung wurde 50 Jahre lang auf Abwege gebracht, und Millionen von Krebskranken haben dafür den Preis bezahlt. Motive dafür waren u.a. die preiswerte Behandlung. Man…
Photo, posted without a caption
Was geschieht, wenn du am Ende deines Lebens bemerkst, dass du gar nicht stirbst? Macht dir das Angst oder kannst du getrost "sterben"? https://www.youtube.com/live/-VrEasczJtE Abschied vom Leben: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxZB4jvjQz4 Amazing Grace - Die große Gnade: Violine by Ayako Ishikawa /アメージンググレース ヴァイオリン演奏 石川綾子 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pq7iGjLetmg&list=RDpq7iGjLetmg&start_radio=1 Hoffnung bei K…
Cancer Care Is Not One-Size-Fits-All—What Other Options Deserve Consideration? IMA’s newly expanded guide with updates from Chief Scientific Officer, @DrPaulMarik 𝘈𝘱𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘢𝘤𝘩 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘜𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘙𝘦𝘱𝘶𝘳𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘋𝘳𝘶𝘨𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘕𝘶𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘗𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘞𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘊𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳, examines evidence-informed approaches involving repurposed drugs, nutraceuticals, metabolic strategies, and cancer-specific protocols. Download the guide and explore more c…
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @CoronaSolution. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 44,013 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CSmedicus | Corona-Solution” (@CoronaSolution), 2,195 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CoronaSolution.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.