Channel
@Nemisis1111
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
645subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001529940944 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nemisis1111 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nemisis1111 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:21 | 645 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 644 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (1 August 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 509 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 01:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
JUST IN - U.S. Embassies across the Middle East including UAE, Qatar, Oman, Iraq, Jordan, Israel, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Egypt issue security alerts advising U.S. citizens "consider departing or be ready to depart if there is an escalation." @disclosetv
JUST IN - Greek fire service confirm that 2 people on a firefighting helicopter are dead following a collision with another helicopter, while they were tackling wildfires. The 2 crew members from the other helicopter were rescued alive. @disclosetv
😢1
1939 CANCER ACT — Illegal to cure CANCER. Passed by Parliament in England. This was also being applied by the U.S. Did you know that under the 1939 Cancer Act, it's actually a criminal offense for medical practitioners to even advise patients on potential cancer cures other than chemotherapy So how can cancer charities accept donations under the assumption that they are searching for a cure, when it's actually a c…
Faucis Buchentwurf auf Laptop gefunden, der gelöscht sein sollte. Beweis über Lug und Betrug und Manipulation der staatl. für Impfstoffe verantwortlichen CDC. Wann ermitteln endlich Staatsanwälte in Deutschland wegen Totschlag oder fahrlässiger Tötung?! https://x.com/i/status/2083582538841284610
🔥1
‼️𝐕𝐀𝐂𝐂𝐈𝐍𝐈 & 𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐓𝐄𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐒𝐏𝐈𝐊𝐄‼️ 𝐁𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐞 𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐚 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐚𝐳𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐥 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟. 𝐏𝐚𝐨𝐥𝐨 𝐁𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐚 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐝 - 𝟐𝟏 𝐋𝐮𝐠𝐥𝐢𝐨 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔, 𝐚 𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐚 𝐝𝐢 @𝐬𝐢𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐚_𝐧𝐨𝐯𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞 👉𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐤 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐞: https://youtu.be/CZxlD17ygus?is=S0E8m-sfOqrA2l-T
Bill Maher: “[Dr. Anthony Fauci] was caught in ACTUAL LIES… The big issue to me is the origin of [COVID], which is very important… and he was telling people up front... it was from the wet markets. ‘That's a conspiracy theory if you say it — escape from the lab.’” “And he KNEW better because we have him in his diary telling us what he was saying to other scientists. Who were saying, ‘No, absolutely.’” “And the REAL…
🔥FULL EVENT: Senate Hearing on Dr. Anthony Fauci's Testimony - 07/29/26 (720p - HD Quality) 🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork 📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
IT'S OFFICIAL: HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has gotten GAVI to ELIMINATE all MERCURY from their vaccines it provides to children "This is an enormous victory for global health." 🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork 📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
⛔️Meet the babies used to make vaccines. Theresa Deisher Ph.D., genetic engineer, on fetal cells, DNA and proteins in "vaccines," unpacks. What are these entities that have been controlling, harassing, poisoning, killing and stealing our souls for thousands of years? This drama cannot be described, but we should be aware that it happens every day, all over the world!!! 💊@SoundOfFreedomChannel
URGENTE: Melilla también está siendo invadida. Tras comprobar la total vulnerabilidad de España, miles de inmigrantes lo intentan ahora a través de la valla de Melilla
Dr. Anthony Fauci Testifies on the COVID-19 Pandemic El que quiera contemplar como un testigo repite la misma frase hasta 60 veces, aquí está el documento Los senadores plantean preguntas muy comprometidas. Incluso han echado de la sala al abogado de Fauci Pero, permanece el paripé. ¿Quién tiene realmente el poder?
Actualización en realidad más de 60 era una estimación prematura Fauci invocó la Quinta Enmienda 111 veces. La próxima semana, votarán para declararlo en desacato. https://t.me/realKarliBonne/327879
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Nemisis1111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Νέμεσις 11:11” (@Nemisis1111), 645 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nemisis1111.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.