Codewithrandom pinned «🚀 I’m planning a 100 Days Full Stack Course — completely FREE for everyone!»

Channel
Codewithrandom
@Codewithrandom
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
235,492subscribers
-658 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001270456808 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Codewithrandom |
| Description | 💡 Your Coding Journey Starts Here! Get free courses, coding resources, internships, job updates & much more. Stay ahead in tech with us! 👨💻📚 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Codewithrandom |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 235,492 | -144 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 235,636 | -191 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 235,827 | -111 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 235,938 | -95 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 236,033 | -117 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 236,150 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:20 | 236,150 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 17 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.10%
- avg views ÷ 235,492 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 12,000
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.246%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (17 May 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 72,070 |
| Reactions total | 177 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 180
- Videos
- 10
- Links
- 671
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,311 reactions across 21 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,067 | 81.4% | |
| 👍 | 67 | 5.11% | |
| 🔥 | 67 | 5.11% | |
| ❤🔥 | 32 | 2.44% | |
| 🎉 | 20 | 1.53% | |
| 🗿 | 13 | 0.992% | |
| 🌚 | 10 | 0.763% | |
| 🐳 | 6 | 0.458% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 0.381% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 0.381% | |
| 🤓 | 5 | 0.381% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 0.381% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.229% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 0.153% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.153% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.076% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.076% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,311reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚀 I’m planning a 100 Days Full Stack Course — completely FREE for everyone!
- 🔥 Yes, I’m in for 100 days95%
- Not Interested😅5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤8
100+ Ready-Made Portfolio Templates with Full Source Code👇👩💻 https://www.codewithrandom.com/2024/03/24/free-coding-resources/ We Create 1000+ HTML, CSS, and JavaScript Projects, Visit Our Website👇 https://www.codewithrandom.com/ 💡 React to this message to get more amazing content like this! 👇 Thank you for being here! ❤️
❤7
✅ Master AI, ML & Data science with free courses >>> Tap below to start learning👇🏻 🔗 https://www.codewithrandom.com/2025/04/09/all-free-coding-resources/ 👍🏻 Don't forget to React to this Message for More Content like this 👇🏻 ✅ Also, Share with others 🚀
👍18❤2
100+ JavaScript Game Projects With Source Code👩💻 https://www.codewithrandom.com/2024/03/24/free-coding-resources/ Do not forget to React to this Message for More Content Like this 👇 Thanks For Joining All 💙🙏
❤46👍8❤🔥7
🚀 Free Platforms to Host Your Coding Projects 1️⃣ GitHub Pages 👉 Best for simple static websites & portfolios 2️⃣ Heroku 👉 Easy backend + app deployment 3️⃣ Firebase Hosting 👉 Fast, secure, great for web apps 4️⃣ Vercel ⭐ 👉 My current favorite 👉 Free analytics (limited) 👉 Next.js works insanely well 5️⃣ Netlify 👉 Simple deploy for frontend projects 💬 Which one do you use for hosting? 🔥 Bonus Guide: A Complete …
❤44🔥2🐳1
🚀 Best Free Internships for Coders (By Big Companies!) 🔗 Architecture / Solutions – AWS APAC https://www.theforage.com/simulations/aws-apac/solutions-architecture-ts4o 🔐 Cybersecurity – Tata https://www.theforage.com/simulations/tata/cybersecurity-sbda 💻 Software Engineering – Electronic Arts https://www.theforage.com/simulations/electronic-arts/software-engineering-awbf 🤖 Robotics & Controls – Johnson & Johnson …
❤28🗿3🤩2🔥1
Found a useful website for developers 👨💻 Free APIs → https://free-apis.github.io/#/ It has a huge collection of free APIs for AI, weather, finance, movies, crypto, books, games, and much more. Do not forget to React ❤️ to this message for more content like this 👇 Thanks for joining all 💙🙏
❤59❤🔥7
🔥 3 FREE Websites Every Frontend Developer Should Bookmark 🎨 1. Coolors 🌐 https://coolors.co Generate beautiful color palettes in seconds. Lock your favorite colors, explore combinations, and export palettes instantly. ⚡ 2. Cubic Bezier 🌐 https://cubic-bezier.com Create smooth custom CSS animation timing functions with a live visual preview. Perfect for making your UI feel more polished. ✨ 3. Animista 🌐 https://an…
❤22🔥10🎉1🤩1
🌐 FREE Domain for Developers If you're planning to build a portfolio, startup, or side project, don't miss this free domain offer. I shared all the details here 👇 https://x.com/itsankitd/status/2075090181775052809 If you find it helpful, don't forget to ❤️ like, 🔁 repost, and follow for more developer resources, AI tools, and tech updates. 🚀
❤38🔥3🗿3🎉1👀1👍1
if you're learning DSA, 3 free sites that actually make algorithms make sense🔖 http://CSVisTool.com — watch algorithms run step by step instead of just imagining them http://VisuAlgo.net — my favorite honestly, covers almost everything, trees graphs stacks queues all animated http://cs.usfca.edu/~galles/visualization — this one you control step by step yourself, good for really understanding what's happening Do n…
❤35🎉4❤🔥2🔥2👍1
20 GitHub repos that teach you more than any paid course 1.30-Days-Of-Python — http://github.com/Asabeneh/30-Days-Of-Python Structured 30-day path, beginner to writing real scripts. 2. project-based-learning — http://github.com/practical-tutorials/project-based-learning Huge collection of step-by-step build tutorials across languages. 3. build-your-own-x — http://github.com/codecrafters-io/build-your-own-x Build y…
❤68👍3⚡2🙏2🎉1🔥1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Codewithrandom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🚀 I’m planning a 100 Days Full Stack Course — completely FREE for everyone!
- 🔥 Yes, I’m in for 100 days95%
- Not Interested😅5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 945,039 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@codingstella · 57,943#1
@the_coding_wizard · 182,622#2
@Curious_Coder · 136,955#3
@codersworld1 · 151,181#4
@frontend_trend · 19,420#5
@helpme_coder · 20,051#6
@JavaScript_Trainings · 97,134#7
@webdev_trainings · 133,957#8
@happywebdev · 15,122#9
@indianhtmlweb · 11,685#10
@javascript · 31,320#11
@aitechinsiderspage · 13,783#12
@developergtm · 13,409#13
@codeslearningTG · 269,931#14
@CodingDrive · 13,265 (as read 11 August 2026)#15
@CdiNotes · 19,365 (as read 11 August 2026)#16
@tech_overflow · 10,397#17
@frontendchannels · 8,918#18
@codescientist · 9,177#19
@codewithimraan · 15,339#20
@plutoverse7 · 30,669#21
@webdevcoursefree · 79,315#22
@linkedin_learning · 218,111#23
@code_wars_official · 44,101#24
@C0DE_NET · 5,099#25
@codewithfun69 · 6,667#26
@NotesGallery1 · 91,779#27
@LearnPython3 · 124,849#28
@designwithrehana · 23,073#29
@codewith_dorellb · 3,496#30
@codingvibess · 8,739#31
@nothing4uss · 17,230#32
@OfficialCodingExpert · 3,308#33
@webuniverse2 · 3,520 (as read 11 August 2026)#34
@everythingaboutcode · 9,692#35
@javascript_courses · 55,599#36
@developperHome · 68,766#37
@CodeDiksha · 3,124#38
@gevstack · 9,058 (as read 11 August 2026)#39
@web_devs_i · 23,153#40
@fedevelopment · 28,851#41
@College_wishlist · 11,473#42
@Javascriptproo · 4,166#43
@lifehackandbug · 19,218#44
@csproject12 · 3,933#45
@React_Training · 63,251#46
@decodedev · 8,291#47
@web_addicted9 · 35,210#48
@webdevgirl · 3,720#49
@computer_science_and_programming · 140,958#50
@ready_dot_code · 8,428#51
@freecodeclub · 14,229 (as read 11 August 2026)#52
@Trickyman2 · 155,283#53
@coding_knwledge01 · 79,972#54
@web_design_templates · 3,889#55
@CodingBugs · 40,834#56
@codehype · 24,060#57
@iron_coding · 17,821#58
@Python53 · 50,290#59
@devxbyte · 5,863#60
@Artificial_Intelligence_COM · 72,308#61
@WebsiteDesignLearningGroup · 28,073#62
@ProjectsWithSourceCode · 2,701 (as read 11 August 2026)#63
@webdevelopment657 · 22,884 (as read 11 August 2026)#64
@QuantumCoding123 · 5,157#65
@udemyrip · 66,906#66
@TrueCaller_Z · 2,076,923#67
@ramandeveloper · 3,212#68
@coderslearning · 33,374#69
@jobs_and_internships_updates · 199,664#70
@goyalarsh · 194,708#71
@CodeTreasure · 37,569#72
@OpenAI_Mastery · 49,809#73
@pythonlearnerr · 110,955#74
@Earning_Crypto_Official · 18,261#75
@python_world_in · 14,052 (as read 11 August 2026)#76
@webguild · 53,130#77
@IcomDigital · 14,878#78
@CodingQuizZone · 1,576#79
@seniorFront · 24,312#80
@iPapkorn · 1,938,735#81
@StoriesByLalitJangra · 586#82
@TechUprise_Updates · 51,117#83
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@codersworld1 · 151,181
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
@the_coding_wizard · 182,622
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
@codeslearningTG · 269,931
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
@Trickyman2 · 155,283
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 12 August 2026
@GreatLearningAcademy · 157,583
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
@jobs_and_internships_updates · 199,664
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Codewithrandom” (@Codewithrandom), 235,492 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Codewithrandom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.