Нашел бота для заработка на просмотре рекламы, вознаграждение неплохое https://t.me/MailingAppBot

Channel
CashieChecks💎
@CashieChecks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
90subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001856671223 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CashieChecks |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CashieChecks |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 90 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:39 | 90 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 226
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 874
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 38s
- Average length
- 38s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Нашел тут один интересный бот с майнингом тонов https://t.me/TonminingN1_bot
🚀 Rocket-чек на 23750 WALL (501 547.8₽) Внутри чека: 95000 активация(й) по 0.2 WALL (4.2₽) с реферальной наградой 0.05 WALL (1.1₽)
Нашел тут один интересный бот с майнингом тонов https://t.me/TonminingN1_bot
Ника❤️ - Новый, удачный агрегатор обмена жетонов в блокчейн TON от двух стартапов 👽&🏳 @cryptosoft_dao @lkyton В связи с нагрузками на сеть TON увеличена пропускная способность серверов, однако всё ещё есть трудности с переводами. Боремся с нагрузками ВМЕСТЕ! #всемудачи
🚀 Rocket-чек на 49 TON (24 705.5₽) Внутри чека: 7000 активация(й) по 0.007 TON (3.5₽) 💬 Подготавливаем к запуску одного из наших партнёров - TONLancer👾 Всё необходимо можно почитать здесь! https://t.me/ton_lancer/17 🤭Немного о проекте: - Первая биржа труда в The Open Network - Команда профессионалов, поддерживаемая нашей Lucky🍀Labs - Успешный закрытый пресейл, собравший более 5.000 TON 📽Что дальше? Запуск MVP и …
🚀 Rocket-чек на 24.504 DFC (5 417.2₽) с паролем Внутри чека: 1021 активация(й) по 0.012 DFC (2.7₽) с реферальной наградой 0.012 DFC (2.7₽) 💬 0.5$👇🏻 https://t.me/AirDrop_trc20bot?start=5856753032 1 HOT 🔥 https://t.me/herewalletbot/app?startapp=5928046-village-138791
🚀 Rocket-чек на 5000 USDT (469 500.0₽) Внутри чека: 200000 активация(й) по 0.02 USDT (1.9₽) с реферальной наградой 0.005 USDT (0.5₽) 💬 @investkingyru
🚀 Rocket-чек на 111199.375 LKY (26 576.0₽) Внутри чека: 3631 активация(й) по 24.5 LKY (5.9₽) с реферальной наградой 6.125 LKY (1.5₽) 💬 Удачная команда! Будь в курсе всех новостей, лутай АирДропы самым первым и развивайся в The Open Network вместе с нами! Удачи 🍀 Стать Lucky🍀Ambassador - @grey_lapwing
🚀 Rocket-чек на 980 GRAM (5 439.4₽) Внутри чека: 784 активация(й) по 1 GRAM (5.6₽) с реферальной наградой 0.25 GRAM (1.4₽) 💬 DROP
https://t.me/TONStartBot/app?startapp=r-1162672170 розыгрыш 12.000.000 TON
🚀 Rocket-чек на 13.3 TON (3 319.2₽) Внутри чека: 1520 активация(й) по 0.007 TON (1.7₽) с реферальной наградой 0.00175 TON (0.4₽) 💬 Frankenstein Royalty Club 💪Коллекция уникальных NFT фигурок 🔥Держатели NFT получают рекордные в сети TON 40% роялти от каждой продажи, а выплаты начисляются раз в месяц. ⚡️Крупные розыгрыши и лотереи. Собери свою банду живых трупов! Ссылка на коллекцию: https://getgems.io/collecti…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CashieChecks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@BitlabTG · 3,9071 postDeFinder Capital (DFC)
@de_findercapital · 279,4401 postHOT Wallet
@herewalletbot · 166,5671 postInvestment kingyru 💎
@investkingyru · 1,858,0991 postLucky TON
@lkyton · 1321 postJason Statham TON
@Statham_TON · 7,2731 postTONLancer $LCR
@ton_lancer · 1,3341 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@CashieChecks named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CashieChecks💎” (@CashieChecks), 90 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CashieChecks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.