Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Инсайды, обзоры, торговые подсказки и подробный разбор крипторынка

@BitlabTG

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,907subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001325521241
TypeChannel
Username@BitlabTG
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BitlabTG

Growth

3,9073,9283,917.56 August 2026 — 3,928 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,928 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,916 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,907 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,904–3,931 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 23:023,907-9
9 Aug 2026, 02:303,916-12
6 Aug 2026, 04:213,928no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:073,928first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5733.9%
👍5532.7%
🤩148.33%
127.14%
👏127.14%
🤝95.36%
🙈74.17%
21.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2025 to 23 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Apr 2025, 06:28 UTC≈1,390 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

уровни сверху видны на графике

👍9🤩2

19 Apr 2025, 07:09 UTC≈1,390 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Наблюдается снижение корреляции альткоинов и биткоина, что сигнализирует о приближающейся волатильности на рынке, то есть ожидаются возможные резкие движения цен. Значительное снижение корреляции часто означает, что в течение короткого периода альткоины не следуют за BTC и в данном случае мы можем увидеть их резкий рост на короткой дистанции пока BTC будет в боковой коррекции

🔥9

17 Apr 2025, 13:03 UTC≈1,260 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

SOL у перспективного сопротивления, в случае пробоя быстрые 170, и даже в случае отката, если биток ещё раз сходит вниз, в потенциале SOL один из фаворитов на быстрое восстановление и будущий рост

👍6🤩1

12 Apr 2025, 04:21 UTC≈1,190 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Тестируем сопротивление глобального бычьего клина на BTC, рост шел хорошими амплитудами с бычьими поглощениями на дневных свечах, шансы на выход вверх есть

🤩8👍21

3 Apr 2025, 11:17 UTC≈1,270 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если отбросить политические факторы и посмотреть по графикам, то увидим, что мы пришли на сильнейшую поддержку ЕМА 200 на недельном ТФ. Очень хороший момент для набора позиций. Даже если будет ещё временный уход вниз, это глобально ни на что не повлияет. Уже сейчас видно на сколько рынок устал от политики и пытается расти в моменты любого затишья. Позитивного фундаментала много, как никогда ранее!

🔥8👍2🤝1

31 Mar 2025, 02:47 UTC≈1,250 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Опытные участники рынка, которые ранее занимались активными продажами на локальных пиках (обозначено красными кругами), теперь изменили свою стратегию в сторону удержания и накопления позиций.

👍11

27 Mar 2025, 04:47 UTC≈1,450 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Top 20 криптовалют, которые, по мнению Grayscale Research, имеют высокий потенциал в следующем квартале.

👍9

25 Mar 2025, 05:53 UTC≈1,080 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Большинство инвесторов, которые покупали во время эйфории с ноября 2024 года по февраль 2025 года, имеют базисную стоимость в диапазоне от $90 тыс. до $93 тыс. Любой отскок в эту зону, вероятно, столкнется с давлением продаж со стороны тех, кто стремится выйти в безубыточности.

🤝8

24 Mar 2025, 05:02 UTC≈1,180 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Рынки растут на слухах о том, что 2 апреля таких сильных таможенных барьеров, которые планировались, США решили не вводить

🔥8

20 Mar 2025, 09:24 UTC≈1,210 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @BitLabNews

Сегодня в 17.40 по мск Трамп выступит на саммите в Нью Йорке, посвященном цифровым валютам. На этом фоне рынок пробился даже выше ожиданий и пока не сильно откатывается в ожидании чего-то большего...

👍4🤩1

19 Mar 2025, 03:19 UTC≈1,260 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Снова зашевелились и были подняты из небытия старые "фундаментальные" монеты. В прошлые разы это часто было сигналом к развороту рынка. Ну и технически масса индикаторов указывает на то, что мы около точки разворота, к апрелю ждут активизации рынков. Уход вниз ещё возможен, выше мы описывали вариант движения, но даже в таком случае он скорее всего будет лишь краткосрочным

🔥8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BitlabTG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 605,368 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Инсайды, обзоры, торговые подсказки и подробный разбор крипторынка” (@BitlabTG), 3,907 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BitlabTG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.