Channel
@legalleasing
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
886subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002406700653 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @legalleasing |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/legalleasing |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:20 | 886 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 886 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 January 2026 – 14 July 2026) |
| Views total | 378 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
71 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 34 | 47.9% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 16.9% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 11.3% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 5.63% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 4.23% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 4.23% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.41% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.41% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 1.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Актуальная практика с ВТБЛ Неприятные пени за просрочку возврата предмета лизинга при расторжении https://max.ru/id5001166960_biz/AZ9hy6CQDAY Снижение пеней с 0,5% в день до разумного уровня https://max.ru/id5001166960_biz/AZ9hzWPJNX4 Не дайте себя обсчитать @moscowleasing
У многих ЛК есть такое простое и незатейливое правило: «кому должен, всем прощаю» Например, предположим, лизингополучатель рассчитался по лизингу, и ожидает переоформления китайского тягача или, положим, какого-нибудь премиального китайского автомобиля Haval Вместо того, чтобы по-партнерски оперативно прислать клиенту документы о переходе права и дать ему возможность насладиться собственностью на кровью и потом опл…
👍8
Еще раз про наболевшее, а именно про то, как подписавшись под один график, клиент ушлого лизингодателя спустя полгода год обнаруживает, что график у него «подорожал» https://t.me/Assoleasing/70 Не секрет, что многие лизингодатели с охотой прибегают к повышению лизинговых платежей своим лизингополучателям при увеличении ключевой ставки В подавляющем большинстве случаев такое увеличение платежей не вызвано пропорцио…
❤2
Это очень верно подмеченная проблема https://t.me/Assoleasing/66 И о ней редко задумываются, когда заходят в лизинг Клиенты, особенно те, которые имеют долгий опыт работы с одним и тем же менеджером лизинговой компании, совсем не обращают внимания на риски связанные с поставщиками. Глянем на сайты лизинговых операторов. Что мы там обнаружим? Мы увидим, что большинство ЛК напрямую рекламируют продажу автомобилей: н…
Итак мы имеем лизинговую фабрику и её клиента У клиента, скажем, два договора с одной «фабрикой»: один полностью оплаченный, а второй не совсем полностью оплаченный, скажем так, совсем не оплаченный, т.е. с с неким долгом, пусть и неправильно посчитанным, ИБО «фабрика» считает по-своему, но не про то речь Итак, клиент приходит к своей лизинговой фабрике с запросом на переоформление права собственности по казалось б…
👍5👎3
Рассказываем про инкассо, что судиться с банком можно, но не нужно https://t.me/Assoleasing/51
🔥1
Если Вы пропустили важное, спешим Вам напомнить, что защищаться по одному гораздо сложнее, чем вместе. АССОЦИАЦИЯ ЛИЗИНГОПОЛУЧАТЕЛЕЙ приглашает всех заинтересованных в нормальном лизинге https://t.me/Assoleasing/50
💯1
Простой ответ на вопрос, для чего АССОЦИАЦИЯ ЛИЗИНГОПОЛУЧАТЕЛЕЙ - чтобы такого не было https://max.ru/id5001166960_biz/AZ2cXyq_Hx0
🥱1
Если Ваш лизингодатель присылает Вам акт сверки, претензию или уведомление о расторжении договора лизинга, в котором прописано, что часть лизинговых платежей ушла на уплату пеней БЕЗ ВАШЕГО СОГЛАСИЯ, то эти действия нарушают закон https://t.me/CarleasingPro/9459 Если Вам нужна подсказка, как действовать в такой ситуации @ruslegalleasing
❤2👍2
Маленький лизингополучатель vs крупнейшая в стране ЛК Очередная история про наивного лизингополучателя «просто», вернувшего технику на деревню дедушке https://bloknot.ru/obshhestvo/zachem-krupnyj-biznes-unichtozhaet-malyj-moskovskie-menedzhery-karkade-za-svoyu-nevnimatelnost-spisali-dengi-s-volgodonskogo-predprinimatelya-1493829.html Спустя полгода герой истории обнаружил, что неприятности с лизингом не просто не з…
👍3❤2👌2
Когда лизингодатель отправляет Вам выглядящий легитимно запрос на получение выписки "по всем счетам" и элегантно разъясняет, что это нужно "просто для отчетности", не спешите. Именно на эти, выявленные с Вашей же помощью счета, потом отправятся инкассо @ruslegalleasing
😁3💯1😱1
Очередной малыш-лизингополучатель столкнулся с неумолимой машиной ГПБА https://t.me/AssoleasingLegal/59 Канва обычная: падение спроса на услуги, снижение выручки, неплатежи по неподъемному лизингу и тут ... на сцене появляются они, "сотрудники СБ" с обычными для них разговорами про "поставить на стоянку" и "наша собственность, делаем, что хотим", "все равно заберем" Нужна помощь в том, чтобы ввести общение с изымат…
❤1👍1🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @legalleasing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 810,403 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лизинг и право. Сальдо. Изъятия. Суды” (@legalleasing), 886 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/legalleasing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.