Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CNN BRASIL

Channel

CNN BRASIL

@CNNBRASIL

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

32,292subscribers

-693 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001243476177
TypeChannel
Username@CNNBRASIL
DescriptionSiga os últimos fatos da política, economia e internacional, no maior canal de notícias do mundo. Breaking news, análises e vídeos
Created30 April 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CNNBRASIL

Growth

32,29232,98532,638.56 August 2026 — 32,985 subscribers6 August 2026 — 32,985 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,970 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,904 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,866 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,748 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,687 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,526 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,408 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,292 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -693. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,188–33,089 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:1732,292-116
13 Aug 2026, 09:4632,408-118
12 Aug 2026, 07:1332,526-161
11 Aug 2026, 04:0132,687-61
10 Aug 2026, 02:1132,748-118
9 Aug 2026, 02:2132,866-38
8 Aug 2026, 01:5132,904-66
7 Aug 2026, 02:3132,970-15
6 Aug 2026, 13:3032,985no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:2732,985first reading

Engagement

196 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.631%
avg views ÷ 32,292 subscribers
Avg views / post
204
196 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
196
of 196 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held196 (5 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total39,969
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Links
667

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC50 viewsread 15 August 2026

Exportações de milho da Argentina batem recorde em julho, diz bolsa

15 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC179 viewsread 15 August 2026

Sadia Halal alcança resultados recordes e impulsiona futuro IPO

15 Aug 2026, 01:09 UTC248 viewsread 15 August 2026

Receita da Oncoclínicas no 2º trimestre é afetada por falta de medicamentos

15 Aug 2026, 01:09 UTC185 viewsread 15 August 2026

Fitch reitera rating do Reino Unido em “AA-“, com perspectiva estável

15 Aug 2026, 00:40 UTC154 viewsread 15 August 2026

Stellantis considera vender fábrica em Toronto após pressão de Trump, diz s

14 Aug 2026, 23:04 UTC184 viewsread 15 August 2026

Ouro fecha em alta e encerra semana de ganhos com perspectivas de Fed

14 Aug 2026, 23:04 UTC168 viewsread 15 August 2026

Bitcoin opera em queda após dados de inflação mais brandos

Showing the 12 most recent of 196 posts we hold for @CNNBRASIL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 166,559 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CNN BRASIL” (@CNNBRASIL), 32,292 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CNNBRASIL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.