Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -2,765. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 104,757–108,352 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 18:17
105,172
-131
15 Sept 2026, 16:16
105,303
-117
13 Sept 2026, 22:00
105,420
-125
12 Sept 2026, 06:36
105,545
-79
9 Sept 2026, 23:58
105,624
-238
6 Sept 2026, 17:41
105,862
-132
4 Sept 2026, 07:38
105,994
-91
2 Sept 2026, 21:45
106,085
-45
1 Sept 2026, 20:34
106,130
-42
31 Aug 2026, 20:14
106,172
-115
30 Aug 2026, 22:04
106,287
-48
30 Aug 2026, 00:44
106,335
-46
29 Aug 2026, 01:29
106,381
-62
28 Aug 2026, 04:32
106,443
-42
27 Aug 2026, 02:26
106,485
-66
26 Aug 2026, 03:23
106,551
-41
25 Aug 2026, 04:52
106,592
-44
24 Aug 2026, 03:35
106,636
-130
22 Aug 2026, 13:23
106,766
-107
21 Aug 2026, 03:42
106,873
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,070
Videos
≈449
Links
≈1,820
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
646 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
393
60.8%
👍
100
15.5%
🔥
61
9.44%
👏
35
5.42%
🤯
31
4.80%
😱
10
1.55%
🙏
7
1.08%
🥰
4
0.619%
😁
3
0.464%
🏆
1
0.155%
💘
1
0.155%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 646 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2025 to 10 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
No fim das contas, essa desaceleração mostra que o pior da inflação pode estar ficando para trás — mas ainda é importante manter o radar ligado nos próximos boletos e no IPCA de junho. Planejar o orçamento, aproveitar promoções e revisar assinaturas ou contratos de serviços pode fazer a diferença e evitar sustos no fim do mês.
Além disso, esse alívio na inflação pode dar ao Banco Central a confiança que faltava para…
E saiu hoje o resultado do IPCA de Maio.
A inflação desacelerou no mês, ficando em 0,26% — abaixo dos 0,43% registrados em abril e a menor alta para um mês de maio desde 2023. Mesmo com a pressão nas contas de luz (+3,62%) e nos medicamentos (+0,69%), a inflação foi contida pela queda nos preços dos alimentos e pela deflação nos transportes (passagens aéreas caíram 11,3% e combustíveis recuaram 0,72%).
No acumulado…
Como ganhar dinheiro (de verdade) com ações?!👇
ASSISTIR A LIVE NO INSTAGRAM
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jornadadadesfudencia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2025 to 10 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Grupo Fechado do Professor Mira @mirarendavariavel · 84,220 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 18 August 2026
O Primo Rico @thiagonigro · 103,654 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 August 2026
Erico Rocha - Galera Raiz @ericorocha_galeraraiz · 89,988 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GRUPO OFICIAL NATH ARCURI!” (@jornadadadesfudencia), 105,172 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jornadadadesfudencia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
