Se você trabalha em uma grande empresa e utiliza muita IA, há boas chances de seu chefe achar que você está mais burro Lideranças de grandes empresas estão preocupadas que o uso intensivo de IA está correndo a capacidade crítica de funcionários 🔗 Leia no site: https://nucleo.jor.br/curtas/2026/08/06/se-voce-trabalha-em-uma-grande-empresa-e-utiliza-muita-ia-ha-boas-chances-de-seu-chefe-achar-que-voce-esta-mais-burro

Channel
Núcleo Jornalismo
@nucleojor
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,804subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001465881157 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nucleojor |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nucleojor |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 1,804 | +9 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 1,795 | +3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 1,792 | +4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 1,788 | +5 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 1,783 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 1,784 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 1,786 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 1,784 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 1,785 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 1,788 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 1,789 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 1,784 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 1,795 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 1,796 | first reading |
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
24 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 45.8% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 16.7% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Ter blog em 2026 é rebeldia Eu posso escrever pra pouca gente, mas eu me importo com o que eu escrevo. 🔗 Leia no site: https://nucleo.jor.br/appetrecho/2026/08/06/ter-blog-em-2026-e-rebeldia/
Não sei você, mas eu vou ativar o login por selfie de vídeo do Google O Google anunciou no fim do mês passado o login por vídeo selfie, um novo método para recuperar o acesso à sua conta caso você esqueça a senha ou perca o celular. 🔗 Leia no site: https://nucleo.jor.br/curtas/2026/08/06/nao-sei-voce-mas-eu-vou-ativar-o-login-por-selfie-de-video-do-google/
Agora foi a IA da Meta que hackeou outra empresa Depois de OpenAI e Anthropic, chegou a vez da Meta 🔗 Leia no site: https://nucleo.jor.br/curtas/2026/08/06/agora-foi-a-ia-da-meta-que-hackeou-outra-empresa/
ANPD manda suspender biometria facial de crianças em escolas do Paraná Agência argumentou ausência de justificativa legal para programa de registro de frequência escolar e considerou imposição desproporcional, excessiva e sem transparência 🔗 Leia no site: https://nucleo.jor.br/reportagem/2026/08/06/anpd-manda-suspender-biometria-facial-de-criancas-em-escolas-do-parana/
👏1
Núcleo lança podcast Segue o Fio Toda semana uma nova discussão sobre os principais assuntos de tecnologia 🔗 Leia no site: https://nucleo.jor.br/institucional/2026/08/06/nucleo-lanca-podcast-segue-o-fio/
👏1
Núcleo lança podcast Segue o Fio Toda semana uma nova discussão sobre os principais assuntos de tecnologia 🔗 Leia no site: https://nucleo.jor.br/institucional/2026/08/06/nucleo-lanca-podcast-segue-o-fio/
Segue o Fio #1 - A ida e a volta do Núcleo Uma conversa com a diretora-executiva do Núcleo 🔗 Leia no site: https://nucleo.jor.br/segue-o-fio/2026/08/06/segue-o-fio-1-a-ida-e-a-volta-do-nucleo/
Guerrilha de marketing digital Um conteúdo viral nem sempre é um viral de verdade 🔗 Leia no site: https://nucleo.jor.br/curtas/2026/08/05/guerrilha-de-marketing-digital/
🔥1
Escritor cria 'GitHub de textos' para não ser acusado de usar IA Eu gosto muito dos cantinhos únicos da internet que o Hacker News me mostra. Nesta quarta caí no blog do Dylan, um site com espírito de anos 90 e web 1.0, no qual um escritor de ficção científica (e, dá para perceber, apaixonado por jogos e RPG) conta como criou um aplicativo para provar que suas obras foram escritas por ele mesmo, sem o uso de IA. 🔗 …
O valor da SpaceX é difícil de engolir Empresa registrou prejuízo e baixa receita apesar de ser avaliada em mais de US$1,4 trilhão 🔗 Leia no site: https://nucleo.jor.br/curtas/2026/08/05/o-valor-da-spacex-e-dificil-de-engolir/
Vídeos em POV para treinar IA? Quem usa o LinkedIn sabe que a plataforma está apinhada não só de textos motivacionais gerados por IA, mas também de vagas de emprego meio obscuras que oferecem pagamento em dólar para treinamento de sistemas de inteligência artificial. 🔗 Leia no site: https://nucleo.jor.br/curtas/2026/08/05/videos-em-pov-para-treinar-ia/
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @nucleojor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@metropolesurgente · 23,893
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 17 September 2026
@CNNBRASIL · 27,253
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Núcleo Jornalismo” (@nucleojor), 1,804 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nucleojor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.