Channel
@mahdiandai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
642subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001555378379 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mahdiandai |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mahdiandai |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 642 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 644 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 643 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
159 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 54 | 34.0% | |
| ⚡ | 48 | 30.2% | |
| 👍 | 40 | 25.2% | |
| 😁 | 17 | 10.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2025 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
همراهان عزیزم 🫶 چندتا پروژه و موضوع پژوهشی جذاب و نو داریم که میخوایم یه تیم خوب و کاربلد تشکیل بدیم که روشون کار کنن. در حال حاضر ۲ نفر جایگاه خالی داره این تیم، در صورت آمادگی و تمایل به همکاری به آیدی @madflh پیام بدید و لطفاً برای دریافت پاسخ صبور باشید 🙏 @mahdiandai
⚡1👍1💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁7
Photo, posted without a caption
😁2
این هم خود مقاله برای مطالعه شما عزیزان 👽
😁3⚡1💯1
یه مقاله جالب میخوندم که نظر جالبی درمورد اینکه داستان "AI" با مشاغل چی میشه و آیا قراره جای انسانها رو بگیره(؟) داشت. مثلا توی پزشکی درمورد یسری رشتهها مثل رادیولوژی و پاتولوژی هم تا حدودی شنیده میشه این حرفا! به چندتا نکته جالب اشاره کرده این مقاله که میگم براتون، یه چیزی که قبلا خودم هم بهش فکر کرده بودم اینه که، اگه بر فرض یه رادیولوژیست رو در نظر بگیریم، کاری که انجام میده شامل شاید هزاران تسک کوچیک و بزرگه…
💯10👍2⚡1
سلام به همه 3> یه گپ ریزی بزنیم درمورد این کانال، بیش از ۳ سال از تأسیس این کانال میگذره، اون زمان من بیشتر درگیر فعالیتهای اجرایی انجمن و کمیته فناوری بودم و همچنین تیمهایی که از این مجموعهها به وجود اومده بودن، وقتی این کانال رو تشکیل دادم هدفم از نوشتن این بود که چیزایی که برام جالبن رو با دیگران به اشتراک بذارم و دیگران رو با خودم در دنیای جذاب "Medical AI" همراه کنم، و بیشتر انگار کسی بودم که سعی داره از ب…
👍15⚡5💯4
احتمالاً درمورد مسئله ریاضیای که اخیراً یکی از مدلهای OpenAI تونسته حلش کنه شنیده باشید، متن زیر نظر یکی از ریاضیدانان نویسنده مقاله اثبات اون هست که یه جمله خیلی جالب داره: "AI [...] often produces the most surprising results by persevering down paths that a human may have dismissed as not worth their time to explore, combining superhuman levels of patience with familiarity with a vast array of technical machiner…
⚡4💯4
هوممم، اینو چطور تفسیر کنیم 🤔
یادتون باشه که هیچ چیزی نباید شما رو متوقف کنه، به هیچ وجه! چه خوب چه بد، چه اینجا چه هرجا، چه الان چه بعداً! فقط باید با تمام قدرت مشغول ساختن خودتون باشید که بقیش نویزه!
👍5⚡2💯1
واقعیت اینه که در طول تاریخ هیچ دولت یا حکومتی نماینده طیف کامل مردمش نبوده، مشروعیت کامل نداشته، خیر مطلق نبوده، مقدس نبوده، بنیان و ساختار و افق دید اونها رو عدهای "انسان" تعیین و اجرا کردن و انسان یعنی نقصان و کاستی! از زاویه دید رفیق، الهی به نظر رسیدن اما از زاویه دید رقیب، شیطانی! اما کدوم درسته؟ "انسان" که هدف غایی خلقت بوده و روح خدا درش دمیده شده بوده رو، قلع و قمع کردن، بیارزش و پست کردن، دستهبندی و د…
💯5👍3⚡2
یه پروژه آموزش پژوهش داریم تو آکادمی [پزشکی عمیق] و چند نفر منتور احتیاج داریم که تو قالب مشخصی که از طرف آکادمی اعلام میشه، قدم به قدم پژوهش رو آموزش بدن به منتیها از عزیزان ارشد و دکتری اگر کسی تجربه پژوهشی قوی داره، به آموزش علاقهمنده، صبوره، و تمایل به همکاری در این پروژه داره بهم پیام بده @madflh
⚡2💯1😁1
چرا چیزای دیگه مصرف کرد، وقتی میشه شورتلیف مصرف کرد؟ کمی از شورتلیف براتون بگم، بدونید چرا باید مصرف کنید، ▪️تو فیلد Biomedical Informatics، شورتلیف یه متن بنیادین (Foundational Text) به حساب میاد، فرض کنید بهش میگن انجیل فیلد! و یه رفرنس مفهومیه (Conceptual). شورتلیف برخلاف کتابهای مهندسی کامپیوتر، «ابزار-محور» نیست (مثلاً یاد نمیده چطور با پایتون کد بزنیم)، بلکه «مفهوم-محوره». مثلا میگه چرا اصلاً به فلان ساخت…
⚡6💯4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mahdiandai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 417,674 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@mahdiandai named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mahdi's taste of AI” (@mahdiandai), 642 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mahdiandai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.