Achievement Unlocked: x4! 🖖 @BoredApeGamble made a x4+ call on Speculative Pro.... $131K ➡️ $591K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats ➡️Auto-buy and sell calls like this through SpyDefi Filters!

Channel
Bored Ape Gambles
@BoredApeGamble
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10,455subscribers
-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001794564478 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BoredApeGamble |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BoredApeGamble |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 10,455 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 10,462 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 10,467 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 10,470 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 10,477 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 10,486 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 10,488 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:49 | 10,488 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.0%
- avg views ÷ 10,455 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,050
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (4 June 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,243 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
🚨 $SPAC — 📍 Entry: 0x6b711b581adde09158b5b26df9ed428caf8479b1 🔗DexScreener: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xb3aae46d4780be2458e466492f49f1deb867a8ca726266cf18c54dcb1f118b75 I’ve opened a $SPAC position here. ⏱Minimum hold: 1 hour 🎁Hourly rewards: $CASHCAT • $PIPEDOG • $STONKBROKERS • $WOOF • $TENDIES 📣 Follow for further updates: https://t.me/SpecProfitAC 0x6b711b581adde09158b5b26df9ed428caf8479b1
🐦 Share on 𝕏 and tag @RickBurpBot 📟 NEW: Multi Group Leaderboards
🟢 Testoaster [228K/5K%] $TOASTER 🔼 🌐 Robinhood @ Uniswap V3 💰 USD: 0.011 💎 FDV: 228K ⇨ 245K [8m] 💦 Liq: 25.7K [x9] 📊 Vol: 269K ⋅ Age: 1d 📈 1H: 45.2K ⋅ 37.2% 🅑 122 Ⓢ 58 👥 TH: 2.9⋅2.7⋅2.6⋅2.2⋅2.1 [22%] 🤝 Total: 291 ⋅ avg 27w old 🌱 Fresh 1D: 7% ⋅ 7D: 35% 🍯 HP: OK 💹 Chart: DEX⋅DEF 🧰 More: 🎨 💪 🐦 [♺] 0x920D04541D7029C50E753bfd2F7B1B3f4bD6c0DE BSD⋅MAE⋅BLO⋅SGM⋅BAN BBW⋅GMG⋅AXI⋅EXP⋅TW 🏆 BoredApeBored @ 14K⋅16x⋅12h 👀 979 ↳…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Dog in a Suit is one of the internet's favourite finance memes. First posted by @AnneChovy2 in May 2023, it blew up to nearly 120K views — a serious dog, in a serious suit, ready for serious business. 0xeaa9abB805Db03b6859662354aBfE0C2A30902ae https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xd91355fc43F92Ef1F128D0c551885560Ed5B1634 https://x.com/i/communities/1938350133072302284
I was stuck grinding Sol memecoins until I switched to the BNB chain. The biggest difference? BNB has real community value. People support builders and long-term projects—not just the next hype pump. After getting rugged over and over on Sol, it's refreshing to see: ✅ No rugs ✅ No farming ✅ Clean launch (I verified the frontrun myself.) And actions speak louder than words. @TCryptochicks just donated 10M $TCC to…
Cortex https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x298f8da45b9000da7a92a00c6fcd3436e1a46751 Robinhood's AI - called cortex 0x26879c326b7664F9FeE7fa83E9274EEA800eaD7c https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcMjT07BqxU
$PEPTI Maybe it’s a great opportunity, maybe just a lesson. Profit might come, or just experience — who knows? But one thing’s for sure: no risk, no thrill. Time will tell — I’ll either say “glad I did” or “at least I tried.” 🚀🎢 https://t.me/peptide_portal https://dexscreener.com/solana/5JawvtvVnvs46sFjMeJTKv183hiscyFC4j941HGcM55X
$ANSEM just airdropped ~619 wallets received between ~$150 and ~$27,200. Let's goooo!
Posted without readable text
Bored Ape Gambles pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @BoredApeGamble. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🌍🏆 Who will win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
- 🇪🇸 Spain10%
- 🇫🇷 France44%
- 🇦🇷 Argentina46%
- 🇧🇷 Brazil0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@rick · 60,5612 postsWatcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 626,9532 postsBasedBot
@based_eth_bot · 65,4001 postBloom EVM
@BloomEVMbot · 37,1261 postBored Ape Calls
@BoredApe_Calls · 27,9161 postPavel Durov
@durov · 11,223,4691 postGiggle Academy
@GiggleAcademy · 1561 postMaestro
@maestro · 39,1461 postPEPTIDE PORTAL
@peptide_portal · 1,1681 postRick’s Lab
@rickburpbotnews · 69,9611 postWelcome to $SPAC
@SpecProfitAC · 491 postWallet News Chat
@wallet_news_en_chat · 62,6181 postWallet Support Team
@wallet_supportbot · 69,2031 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@BoredApeGamble named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bored Ape Gambles” (@BoredApeGamble), 10,455 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BoredApeGamble.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.