4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +267. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 114–461 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Sept 2026, 07:55
421
+155
4 Sept 2026, 08:35
266
+112
3 Sept 2026, 09:00
154
no change
3 Sept 2026, 08:46
154
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
61.8%
avg views ÷ 421 subscribers
Avg views / post
260
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
20 (2 September 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
5,205
Reactions total
183
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
183 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
61
33.3%
🔥
60
32.8%
🥰
13
7.10%
💯
11
6.01%
👌
10
5.46%
🐳
9
4.92%
🍾
7
3.83%
❤🔥
4
2.19%
👍
4
2.19%
👏
4
2.19%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Another huge $SHIB, $FLOKI and $DOGE influencer has just posted about us 👇
With nearly 500,000 followers, SHIB Knight is one of the most established voices within the legacy meme ecosystem, building enormous social capital across the $SHIB, $DOGE and $FLOKI communities across multiple cycles.
While many projects onboard countless KOL’s, are trajectory is highly strategic in onboarding OG whale communities where mul…
We are now trending on Binance Hot searches
Attention in masses is turning to DOGE-1 on Robinhood, and for good reason.
Binance has been pivotal in pushing the stock meta alongside Vlad. Expect organic trendings and exposure to ten fold from here.
The foundations for a major X roll-out are being formed. And these will only be amplified daily.
We will take every means to take this Space dog to the stars.
Happy 1,000 holders, DOGE-1 ARMY. 🐕🚀
1,000 holders secured, and the core narrative is only beginning to enter the spotlight.
We expect attention around the DOGE-1 story to accelerate and our objective is simple: funnel as much of that exposure as possible directly toward $DOGE1.
In just the last few hours, we’ve rolled out only a fraction of our planned Chinese marketing. That expansion will continue alongside bro…
Multiple OG $SHIB and $DOGE influencers are now posting about $DOGE1, putting the narrative directly in front of some of the most battle-tested communities and whales in memecoin history.
We will take every means to ensure this only amplifies from here.
Shib 👇
https://x.com/shibinfo/status/2095223679093277072
Dogecoin Rise 👇
https://x.com/dogecoinrise/status/2095202156081016968
DOGE SpaceX 👇
https://x.com/dogespa…
To add on, SOL Doge-1 is at 4.5M MC, we are over 8x from flipping.
This is the only Doge-1 with SPCX rewards and this past week on Robinhood chain should have taught you all where the real momentum actually comes from.
Stock paired memecoins will take over the entire space and we have positioned ourselves perfectly to be the next runner.
Multiple listings + paid marketing will rollout today alongside further trend…
GM! Time to unleash out next marketing campaign today...
We gave you all reassurance yesterday when we had our first sharp correction and i hope that instills more trust in you all.
This project wasn't made for such low milestones and our team will never give up especially because of how strong the narrative is.
Expect everything to begin scaling up today. We got rid of all the toxic holders and replaced them with…
Ⓜ️ #DOGE-1 is officially featured on @CoinMarketCap 🔥
Another huge step in our journey—momentum is real! 💎
Ⓜ️ https://coinmarketcap.com/community/articles/6a985c792bdfb536c680f8a1
🦎 #DOGE-1 is making waves on GeckoPulse 🌊
Attention from every corner—this is big!
🦎 https://www.geckopulse.org/2026/09/doge1-is-bringing-doge-1-mission-to.html
❤3👌2💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Doge1onRH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Doge-1 Announcement Channel” (@Doge1onRH), 421 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Doge1onRH.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.