Corinne Reverbel Officiel pinned «‼️Si vous voyez des messages sur mon fil de discussion ou bien en privé qui semblent venir de moi qui vous recommandent un site, des produits etc , ce n’est pas moi qui les écrits Des escrocs se font passer pour moi et usurpent mon identité ‼️ Je ne vous…»

Channel
Corinne Reverbel Officiel
@CorinneReverbelOfficiel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,647subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001542701754 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CorinneReverbelOfficiel |
| Created | 25 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CorinneReverbelOfficiel |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 1,647 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 1,649 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:22 | 1,648 | -32 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 1,680 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:15 | 1,677 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 1,673 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 1,672 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 1,669 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 1,664 | +6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 1,658 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 1,653 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 1,655 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 1,656 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 1,656 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 23s
- Average length
- 1m 12s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
82 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 43 | 52.4% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 24.4% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 8.54% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 7.32% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 3.66% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.44% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
‼️Si vous voyez des messages sur mon fil de discussion ou bien en privé qui semblent venir de moi qui vous recommandent un site, des produits etc , ce n’est pas moi qui les écrits Des escrocs se font passer pour moi et usurpent mon identité ‼️ Je ne vous écrirai JAMAIS en privé sur Telegram ni ne ferai de la publicité pour un quelconque produit Merci
❤5👍4
Signed Corinne Reverbel
🔴 BonsensOrg a saisi le Conseil constitutionnel via une contribution extérieure au sujet de la loi interdisant l’accès aux réseaux sociaux aux moins de 15 ans. #BonSens défend l’intérêt supérieur de l’enfant, la proportionnalité et les données scientifiques. Une interdiction totale est contre-productive : contournement massif, choc psychologique, report vers des espaces plus dangereux. L’éducation et la responsabil…
👍5
Signed Corinne Reverbel
🚨 Bonsens_Org vient de déposer une contribution extérieure au Conseil constitutionnel (n° 2026-911 DC) contre la loi interdisant les réseaux sociaux aux moins de 15 ans. Une interdiction générale n’est ni proportionnée ni scientifiquement étayée. Elle risque d’aggraver les dangers pour les mineurs (contournement, isolement, report vers le dark web). Lire le communiqué https://bonsens.info/contribution-exterieure-au…
👍4
Signed Corinne Reverbel
✏️ Le BonSens de l'Humour par Pilex
😁3
Signed Corinne Reverbel
✏️ Le BonSens de l'Humour par Pilex
😢6🔥2
Signed Corinne Reverbel
✏️ Le BonSens de l'Humour par Pilex
😁4🤬3
Signed Corinne Reverbel
🍇 LEVURES ET ALIMENTATION – PROJET DU PR SÉRALINI BonSens.org soutient une recherche passionnante du Pr Gilles-Éric Séralini sur les levures naturelles (champignons microscopiques) présentes sur les fruits, légumes et vins bio. Ces levures, détruites par les pesticides, possèdent des propriétés remarquables : - Anti-cancer - Détoxifiantes - Antioxydantes - Protectrices contre les infections - Amélioration du microb…
👍12❤1
Signed Corinne Reverbel
🍇 Incroyable découverte ! Le Pr Séralini révèle le pouvoir de levures naturelles : propriétés anti-cancer, détox & alliées du microbiote ! Présentes dans le bio et les vins naturels. Un projet passionnant soutenu par BonSensOrg 🔥 Envie de soutenir plus de recherches indépendantes comme celle-ci ? Chaque don fait la différence ! ❤️ https://helloasso.com/associations/bonsens-org/formulaires/2 #Seralini #BonSens #S…
👍6
Signed Corinne Reverbel
Kyria de La Table De Gaya est méga énervée !!! Et elle a bien raison ! Il faut savoir ce que l'on veut dans la vie Manger des trucs bourrés de pesticides, venant de l'agriculture intensive qui viennent de l'autre bout de la planète (transport #pollution) ou manger de bons produits locaux et français ? Décidons d'acheter français (et si possible en direct à nos #paysans), et le #mercosur et autres traités minabl…
❤14👍10👏1
Signed Corinne Reverbel
🧭 TROISIÈME VOLET DU SONDAGE MIS GROUP POUR FRANCE-SOIR ET BONSENS.ORG enquête menée les 31 MAI ET 1ER JUIN 2026 sur un échantillon représentatif de 1200 personnes, méthode des quotas. Intentions de vote : le « parti du rejet » (aucun des candidats) domine au premier tour, puis le RN sort nettement en tête. Au second tour, quelle que soit la configuration, le RN l’emporte. Jordan Bardella et Marine Le Pen obtienne…
Signed Corinne Reverbel
🧭 DEUXIÈME VOLET DU SONDAGE MIS GROUP POUR FRANCE-SOIR ET BONSENS.ORG enquête menée les 31 MAI ET 1ER JUIN 2026 sur un échantillon représentatif de 1200 personnes, méthode des quotas. Ces résultats révèlent un plébiscite souverainiste dans une France habituellement clivée, avec une opinion publique profondément désabusée qui réclame des mesures radicales de protection des intérêts nationaux. Ces données montrent un…
👍2
Signed Corinne Reverbel
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @CorinneReverbelOfficiel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Corinne Reverbel Officiel” (@CorinneReverbelOfficiel), 1,647 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CorinneReverbelOfficiel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.