3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 417–419 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 13:17
417
-2
6 Aug 2026, 19:31
419
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:21
419
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 24 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.3%
avg views ÷ 417 subscribers
Avg views / post
131
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held
12 (24 December 2025 – 31 July 2026)
Views total
261
Reactions total
18
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
162 reactions across 12 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
47
29.0%
🔥
36
22.2%
👏
12
7.41%
💯
12
7.41%
😍
11
6.79%
🤩
9
5.56%
❤🔥
7
4.32%
👍
6
3.70%
🤝
4
2.47%
🏆
3
1.85%
👌
3
1.85%
🥰
3
1.85%
👨💻
2
1.23%
😎
2
1.23%
😢
2
1.23%
🍾
1
0.617%
👎
1
0.617%
💘
1
0.617%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ما بعد از این رویداد جذاب، از طرف شما کلی پیام و انگیزه نامه های فوق العاده داشتیم 😎✨
تا آخرِ این هفته همهی موارد و رزومه ها بررسی میشه و یه گفت و گوی کوتاهی با هم خواهیم داشت🤝
تا قبل اینکه ما بیایم سراغتون حتما به این فکر کنین که اگه یه فرصت واقعی داشتین چطور ازش استفاده میکردین؟!😌
🧩 | @Bazipors
🎯 بعضی فرصتها از اون چیزایین که نباید فقط از کنارشون رد شد...
اگه دوست داری یه روز تو یکی از شرکت های مطرح ایران کار کنی، شاید اولین قدمش فقط این باشه که خودت رو جای درست، به آدم های درست نشون بدی. 😉
برای همین ما هم تو رویداد بنیانآموز حضور داریم و غرفه بازیپُرس رو اونجا برپا میکنیم. ✌️
📍 دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر
🗓 چهارشنبه ۷ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
⏰ ساعت ۱۳ تا ۱۹
🎁 اما یه خبر خوب برای بچه های بازیپُرس...
ما تعداد محدودی…
این چند وقت که اینجا خبری نبود، فکر نکنید استراحت میکردیم!🫢
ما داشتیم تو پلتفرم «بله» با دو پروندهی حسابی، ذهنهای زیادی رو به چالش میکشیدیم و غوغا کردیم.🤌
حالا وقتشه که بازی رو بیاریم تو زمینِ اولی مون یعنی اینجا 📍
پروندههای قبلی که گذشتن؛ اگه میخواید بدونید ماجرا چیه، بله رو چک کنید🕵🏻♀✨
ما اینجا هستیم برای شروعِ پرونده سوم🗂
اگه آمادگیِ درگیر شدن با یه معمایِ واقعی رو دارید، بفرمایید! این گوی و این میدان…
رویداد ژنوم؛ یک بلندپروازی برای ما بود.🪐
انتخاب لحظات خوب رویداد بین عکسها برامون سخت بود... دی ماه امسال با حضور تک تک شما ها بود که باعث شد یکی از آرزوهامونو تیک بزنیم🤌
معمولا پست های آخر هر برنامه رو من غنیمت میشمارم برای تشکر، تشکر از همه ی کسایی که کنارمون وایستادن و نذاشتن بیفتیم✌️
همهی کسایی که کارمونو از خودشون دونستن و یه تنه وایستادن تا نتیجه خوب شو ببینن🫠
و همهی کسایی که با وجود اذیت های ما، مشوق بو…
#اطلاعیه_شماره_سه
بیش از ۱۰۰ گواهی حضور ارسال شد
📌 تمامی شرکتکنندگانی که درخواست گواهی داشتن، تا دقایقی پیش تقدیم شون شد.
🏷چک کنید اگر اشتباه تایپی تو اسم یا کدملی تون وجود داره یا کسی جا مونده تا فردا به ادمین بگید.
⁉️یه سری از عزیزان سوال داشتن که این گواهی به چه درد میخوره؟!
این گواهی صرفا یادگاری نیست و نشون میده شما تو رویداد حضور داشتید و بخشی از یه تجربه جمعی بودید.
میتونید ازش تو رزومه، پروفایل لینکدین…
با افتخار و شادی فراوان
کسب رتبه ی اول نقش آفرینی بانوان در دومین المپیک بازی های فکری دانشجویان ایران توسط
سرکار خانم زهرا حیدری
را اعلام میکنیم. 🏆
پ.ن: بیشک و بدون تردید راهبری و حضور خانم حیدری در کنار تیم بازیپرس، غنیمتی ارزشمند برایِ خانواده خلاق ماست.😎
🧩 | @bazipors
#اطلاعیه_شماره_دو
لینک استفاده از سرویس هوشمند ادپتو برای دوستان ارسال شد
📌تمامی شرکتکنندگانی که تصویر بلیطشونو برای ادمین فرستاده بودن، لینک رو دادیم، اگه کسی دریافت نکرد پیام بده ❗️
⚠️دقت داشته باشید که استفاده از این سرویس زمان محدود داره، وقت بذارید و از فرصتی که براتون درنظر گرفتیم استفاده کنید.
📌نگران گواهی هاتونم نباشید، فقط امضاش مونده که اونم اگه مسئولین بدن، خدمت عزیزان ارسال میشه🤝
🧩 | @bazipors
#اطلاعیه
تمامی پیام هایی که به ادمین داده شده رو دیدیم ما❕
سین زده نمیشه که به ترتیب اسامی گواهی ها آماده بشه و ارسال بشه ✅
به پیام های کانال دقت نظر داشته باشید
📌لینک سرویس هوشمند ادپتو هم همراه با گواهی، برای تمامی عزیزانی که نظرسنجی رو پر کردن و تصویر بلیط شونو فرستادن، ارسال خواهد شد.
🧩 | @bazipors
دیدن پیامهاتون تو پرسلاین از بهترین اتفاقات این رویداده✨
ما برای احترام به خودمون و شما تلاش میکنیم بهتر باشیم
دوستانی که هنوز پر نکردن ممنون میشم که این همراهی رو با ما داشته باشن😇
پ.ن:پیام های ادمین هم تو اولین فرصت سین زده میشه، گواهی هاتون نهایتا تا یه هفته آماده میشه و تقدیم تون میکنیم 🔖
پ.ن۱:برنده های بازی معمایی هم تا آخر هفته ی آینده مشخص میشه و هدایا شونو تقدیم میکنیم🤝
پ.ن۲:گزارش تصویری هامونم در…
https://survey.porsline.ir/s/Fv1nhW5n
نظرسنجی رویداد رو گذاشتیم تا ببینیم چیزی که ما براش تلاش کردیم، برای شما چطور بود؟!
ممنون میشیم همه ی عزیزانی که حضور داشتن بار دیگه با ما همراهی کنن🙏
❤8👎1👨💻1🔥1🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Bazipors. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 61,752 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بازیپُرس|طراح بازی های آموزشی🧩” (@Bazipors), 417 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bazipors.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.