Channel
@BCGFYZ
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
133subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001204006509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BCGFYZ |
| Description | 博创官网：https://bochuang88.com 集团频道 @BCDBGP 导航频道 @BCDB_MAP 规则频道 @BCDBGZ 需求频道 @BCDBXQ 供给频道 @BCDBGY 国内支付 @BCDB_PAY 多国支付 @BCDB_DGZF 多国租卡 @BCDB_DKZK 搬砖换汇 @BCDB_exchange 汇兑规则 @BCDBHD 数据担保 @BCDBSpread 曝光仲裁 @BCGFYZ 免费资源 @BCDBZU |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BCGFYZ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 133 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 133 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 4 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
‼️ 跑路曝光，请合作伙伴与同业注意 ‼️ 致 各位尊敬的伙伴与同业： 🚫貔貅支付/安信支付🚫跑路公告 "安信Pay- 商务处理"（ID：@AlTrustPay666） "安信Pay- 汤圆"（ID：@AlTrustPay888） 数群余额不回，恶意跑路。 为避免同行在找寻合作方时碰到同一批诈骗者，进而造成时间及财务上的损失，博创担保在此将诈骗手法、诈骗团伙账号、公告周知，并提醒同业留意，如遇类似状况，请多加提防，以免上当。 诈骗者使用之机器人 : @anxinpay777_bot 🆘博创担保在此公布该诈骗团伙经营名称，提醒同业伙伴注意，以免造成二次受害。🆘 博创担保 敬上
Signed 博创担保 Sam
‼️ 跑路曝光，请合作伙伴与同业注意 ‼️ 致 各位尊敬的伙伴与同业： 🚫宝石支付🚫跑路公告 "Euan K"（ID：@Euan77） "GEM-pay 余鱼鱼"（ID：@YuYu7212） 堆高余额不回，退群跑路。 为避免同行在找寻合作方时碰到同一批诈骗者，进而造成时间及财务上的损失，博创担保在此将诈骗手法、诈骗团伙账号、公告周知，并提醒同业留意，如遇类似状况，请多加提防，以免上当。 诈骗者使用之机器人 : @GEMzhushoubot 🆘博创担保在此公布该诈骗团伙经营名称，提醒同业伙伴注意，以免造成二次受害。🆘 博创担保 敬上
Signed 博创中国渠道商务 sam
‼️ 诈骗曝光，请合作伙伴与同业注意 ‼️ 致 各位尊敬的伙伴与同业： 诈骗人 "Lucas"（ID：@L88980） "Tommy（此号不私聊）"（ID：@cmm8520） 2024年8月与我司接触，表示自身为平博盘口，找寻银行卡代收渠道。 交易过程中，渠道发现料性不符，款项均为诈骗，並在提及赔付时不回应所有讯息。 为避免同行在找寻合作方时碰到同一批诈骗者，进而造成时间及财务上的损失，博创担保在此将诈骗团伙账号与使用电子钱包地址公告周知，并提醒同业留意，如遇类似状况，请多加提防，以免上当。 诈骗者使用之电子钱包地址： TSFUAJFsSadbqTG2Yk9s6aaowqgjy8ESed 🆘博创担保在此公布该诈骗团伙名称及钱包，提醒同业伙伴注意，以免造成二次受害。🆘 博创担保 敬上
Signed 博创中国渠道商务 sam
[ 公告 ] 近日，博创接获通知，有不肖份子散播谣言，恶意诋毁我司信誉。 博创担保在此作出澄清： 博创担保已运营六年，只要是我们「該退」的钱，该「赔付」的押金，一块钱也没有少过。 本事件这群人自称开云体育，于博创担保合作卡卡通道，正式跑量群中通道已确实下发，故退担保押金并标示群内。但需方内部人员卷款跑路，并将责任想尽办法推给博创。 此案已结，供方所有金额已确保下发，押金已退，需方押金也依照期效已退。 博创集团自成立至今，始终以诚信经营为最高原则，以最严谨的态度面对每一笔交易，才能赢得众多合作伙伴的信任与认同。区区抹黑不仅无法伤害博创的信誉，只会促使我们更加认真完善交易制度，继续为客户提供更优质的服务。 ＊友情提示：博创工作人员不会在任何情况下向您索要回扣、私人佣金。任何涉及客户资金的操作及需要客户配合的部分均会有财务人员以及对接专员在内三方确认方为有效。 - 博创职业道德投诉通道 @AJ_BCDB - 博创公开…
Signed 博创客户需求专员
‼️ 引流诈骗曝光，请合作伙伴与同业注意 ‼️ 致 各位尊敬的伙伴与同业： 诈骗人"阿基米德"（ID：@massk88）以及"K J"（ID：@jn8game）于1月11日与我司接触，表示能提供广告引流服务，并附上相关数据（1-2小时内创造200+会员注册的截图）来提高取信度。 交易过程中，需求方在合作谈好后，即时的支付了款项5,500 USDT（请参考图），但支付完款项后，并没看到流量如期进来，提出询问，诈骗者则不断以「需要多点时间」等话术去拖延。 在等待1-2天后，需求方依然没见到点击量和注册量有任何的提升，可以说几乎为0，此时诈骗者才再次改口，以「劫持口没好，方案还在制定」为由想继续扯皮拖延，当被我方人员当场拆穿，便退群跑路。 市场上引流服务往往需要先支付款项，为避免同行在找寻合作方时碰到同一批诈骗者，进而造成时间及财务上的损失，博创担保在此将诈骗手法、诈骗团伙账号、相关网域名称与使用电子钱包地址公告周知，并提…
【公告：博创集团名号遭恶意冒充行骗】 #诈骗 #注意 #曝光 #骗子短鸡鸡 #高潮半秒钟 近日，博创接获合作伙伴通知，得知业界忽然出现许多传闻—指向博创担保在行骗。 博创成立４年以来，始终战战兢兢为行业伙伴提供最高标准的安全服务；即便在交易过程中遇到任何机制瑕疵，也会以最大诚意进行赔付，自认从无丝毫愧对商务伙伴的行为，行骗更是无从说起。 不过经我司调查，发现坊间近日忽然出现大量恶意仿冒博创担保的“假频道”与“假账号”。 骗子会先盗取博创客服人员的头像，再以“创博”、“博牛”或者相近的ID鱼目混珠，伪装成我司人员或频道，再向不察的无辜受害者行骗。 博创集团在此提醒，我司官方业务频道、官方工作人员名单、客服人员名单，可在“博创担保 - 集团频道”（https://t.me/BCDBGP/6 ）中查询。尤其官方工作人员，必定有集团配发的图标、头像，以及ID中包含“BCDB”字串等以供鉴别。 （※各位在与博创交易时，请认明官…
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @BCGFYZ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 300,227 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@BCGFYZ named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“博创担保—曝光仲裁频道” (@BCGFYZ), 133 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BCGFYZ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.