Channel
@BCDBGP
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
572subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001610190771 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BCDBGP |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BCDBGP |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 572 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 572 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 13 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (13 November 2025 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 957 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【‼️ 紧急通知 ‼️】 亲爱的博创伙伴们： 我司 博创商务 Ray / 博创中国承兑商务 / 博创汇兑客服 账号已停用，目前此几个账号ID及头像可能遭人冒用，切勿点击不明连结或打款，该帐号之行为与本公司无关联。 所有博创商务账号请认明频道 @BCDBGXPD 及 @BCDB_DGZF ‼️近期坊间出现不少博创「假帐号」「假频道」 ，博创各类频道、官方工作人员、客服人员名单都将公告于「博创担保 - 集团频道」，其馀皆可视为骗子忽视。 感谢您的长期支持 六年老品牌 博创担保敬上
🥰博创集团🥰 2026世界盃 你只管热血冲锋⚽️ 后防交给我🛡 每周为您提供赛程表与赛事分析✍️ 三方支付通道/各国支付/备付金代付/换汇，老品牌为您专人专群提供一条龙服务🔍 博创集团 × 一站式出海创业伙伴 ✍️中国支付 : https://t.me/BCDBGXPD ✈️多国支付：https://t.me/BCDB_DGZF 💼集团资讯：https://t.me/BCDBGP💬 😇冠军赛⚽️⚽️不负责任分析 : 7/20 03:00 西班牙🇪🇸 vs 阿根廷🇦🇷 这是新王登基，还是老王封神。阿根廷有经验、节奏控制和关键球能力；西班牙有控球、压迫和稳定防守。关键在谁先进球：阿根廷先进，比赛会变成心理战；西班牙先进，阿根廷体能压力会很大。整体看，西班牙更像冷血冠军机器。 主推：西班牙🇪🇸2-1 ；备选：1-1；备选：2-2 🥰博创集团🥰祝大家拼一次富三代。
🥰博创集团🥰 2026世界盃 你只管热血冲锋⚽️ 后防交给我🛡 每周为您提供赛程表与赛事分析✍️ 三方支付通道/各国支付/备付金代付/换汇，老品牌为您专人专群提供一条龙服务🔍 博创集团 × 一站式出海创业伙伴 ✍️中国支付 : https://t.me/BCDBGXPD ✈️多国支付：https://t.me/BCDB_DGZF 💼集团资讯：https://t.me/BCDBGP💬 😇季军赛不负责任分析 : 7/19 05:00 英格兰 vs 法国 这不是季军赛，是豪门面子保卫战。**英格兰刚被逆转，心态容易急；法国被西班牙打掉决赛门票，反而可能火力全开。季军赛防守通常没那么死，双方都想用进球找回尊严。法国速度、反击和个人爆点更强，看好法国赢下这场。 主推：法国🇫🇷2-1 ；备选：3-2 🥰博创集团🥰祝大家拼一次富三代。
🥰博创集团🥰 2026世界盃 你只管热血冲锋⚽️ 后防交给我🛡 每周为您提供赛程表与赛事分析✍️ 三方支付通道/各国支付/备付金代付/换汇，老品牌为您专人专群提供一条龙服务🔍 博创集团 × 一站式出海创业伙伴 ✍️中国支付 : https://t.me/BCDBGXPD ✈️多国支付：https://t.me/BCDB_DGZF 💼集团资讯：https://t.me/BCDBGP💬 😇4强赛不负责任分析 : 7/15 03:00 法国🇫🇷 vs 西班牙🇪🇸 这场是欧洲王权战争，不是普通半决赛。法国会故意让出部分控球，等西班牙后场传导失误后直接打纵深；西班牙则会用控球和压迫把法国拖进消耗战。关键在于西班牙能不能守住法国第一波反击，如果被法国先破门，后面空间会越拉越大，比赛可能瞬间变成法国最爱的猎杀局。 主推：法国🇫🇷2-1 ；备选：1-0；备选：3-1 7/16 03:00 英格兰🏴 vs 阿根廷🇦🇷 这是剧本味最…
🥰博创集团🥰 2026世界盃 你只管热血冲锋⚽️ 后防交给我🛡 每周为您提供赛程表与赛事分析✍️ 三方支付通道/各国支付/备付金代付/换汇，老品牌为您专人专群提供一条龙服务🔍 博创集团 × 一站式出海创业伙伴 ✍️中国支付 : https://t.me/BCDBGXPD ✈️多国支付：https://t.me/BCDB_DGZF 💼集团资讯：https://t.me/BCDBGP💬 😇16强赛不负责任分析 : 7/7 03:00 葡萄牙🇵🇹 vs 西班牙🇪🇸 伊比利内战，葡萄牙靠个人能力，西班牙靠控场与边路压迫；节奏会很快。 西班牙🇪🇸 2-1 7/7 08:00 美国🇺🇸 vs 比利时🇧🇪 美国有主场与冲击力，但比利时经验、禁区处理、关键球能力更成熟。 比利时🇧🇪 2-1 7/8 00:00 阿根廷🇦🇷 vs 埃及🇪🇬 阿根廷控场与节奏管理较稳，埃及主要靠反击与边路速度找机会。 阿根廷🇦🇷 2-0 7…
🥰博创集团🥰 026世界盃 你只管热血冲锋⚽️ 后防交给我🛡 每周为您提供赛程表与赛事分析✍️ 三方支付通道/各国支付/备付金代付/换汇，老品牌为您专人专群提供一条龙服务🔍 博创集团 × 一站式出海创业伙伴 ✍️中国支付 : https://t.me/BCDBGXPD ✈️多国支付：https://t.me/BCDB_DGZF 💼集团资讯：https://t.me/BCDBGP💬 😇32强赛不负责任分析 : 6/30 01:00 日本🇯🇵 vs 巴西🇧🇷 日本小组赛防反攻强，巴西个人硬实力碾压但阵地战破防效率受疑，需防常规时间被拖入僵局。 建议比分：巴西🇧🇷 2-1 6/30 04:30 德国🇩🇪 vs 巴拉圭🇵🇾 德国整体火力凶猛但防线有漏洞，巴拉圭球风硬朗但后程体能与深度不足，难以全场抵挡德意志战车。 建议比分：德国🇩🇪 2-0 6/30 09:00 荷兰🇳🇱 vs 摩洛哥🇲🇦 北非铁血防线对抗顶级高效…
愿您：品尝生活之甘甜，主宰人生之赛场 🥰博创集团🥰祝您端午安康，看球愉快！
😇不负责任分析 : 6/16 03:00 比利时🇧🇪 vs 埃及🇪🇬 比利时整体火力较好，但埃及反击有威胁，不会太轻松。 建议比分：比利时🇧🇪 2-1 6/16 06:00 沙特🇸🇦 vs 乌拉圭🇺🇾 乌拉圭强度、逼抢、禁区终结能力明显较优。 建议比分：乌拉圭🇺🇾 2-0 6/16 09:00 伊朗🇮🇷 vs 新西兰🇳🇿 伊朗经验与防守稳定性较好，新西兰高球有威胁但创造力有限。 建议比分：伊朗🇮🇷 1-0 6/17 03:00 法国🇫🇷 vs 塞内加尔🇸🇳 强强对撞，塞内加尔身体素质够硬，但法国进攻天花板更高。 建议比分：法国🇫🇷 2-1 6/17 06:00 伊拉克🇮🇶 vs 挪威🇳🇴 挪威前场冲击更直接，伊拉克若守不住前 30 分钟会很难打。 建议比分：挪威🇳🇴 2-0 6/17 09:00 阿根廷🇦🇷 vs 阿尔及利亚🇩🇿 阿根廷控场能力更稳，阿尔及利亚有速度但容错率低。 建议比分：阿根廷…
😇不负责任分析 : 6/12 (五) 03:00 墨西哥 🇲🇽 vs 南非 🇿🇦 建议比分：墨西哥 🇲🇽 2-1 精简分析：墨西哥主场开幕战，气势与熟悉环境加成明显；南非反击有机会偷一球。结合高原体能消耗，墨西哥不败概率极大。 10:00 韩国 🇰🇷 vs 捷克 🇨🇿 建议比分：韩国 🇰🇷 1-0 精简分析：韩国速度与边路冲击较强，捷克身材与定位球有威胁。若韩国能通过高频转换率先破冰，有机会将1球优势守到最后。 6/13 (六) 03:00 加拿大 🇨🇦 vs 波斯尼亚 🇧🇦 建议比分：加拿大 🇨🇦 2-1 精简分析：加拿大主场＋速度型打法占优，但后防不算稳，可能互有进球。 09:00 美国 🇺🇸 vs 巴拉圭 🇵🇾 建议比分：美国 🇺🇸 2-1 精简分析：美国主场压迫会更积极，巴拉圭硬度够但进攻爆点略少。美国整体核心期望值（xG）更高。 6/14 (日) 03:00 卡塔尔 🇶🇦 vs 瑞士 🇨🇭 建议比分：瑞士 🇨…
🥰博创集团🥰 2026世界盃 你只管热血冲锋⚽️ 后防交给我🛡 每周为您提供赛程表与赛事分析✍️ 三方支付通道/各国支付/备付金代付/换汇，老品牌为您专人专群提供一条龙服务🔍 🌍人脉｜合作｜资源流通🌍，一站全配 博创不只同行，更与您连结未来！ 博创集团 × 一站式出海创业伙伴 ✍️中国支付 : https://t.me/BCDBGXPD ✈️多国支付：https://t.me/BCDB_DGZF 💼集团资讯：https://t.me/BCDBGP💬
🥰博创集团🥰 三方支付通道/各国支付/备付金代付/换汇，老品牌为您专人专群提供一条龙服务🔍 ❗️❗️TikTok 能投博彩广告？不可能吧？❗️❗️ 之前确实不行。 但现在，博创集团通道正式打通了 🔑 怎么做到的？ 👉 合规资质全套配齐 👉托管账号 + 白名单一站搞定 👉创意素材指导，提高过审效率 TikTok 信息流 + Pangle 联盟双端覆盖 18+ 精准定向，触达高意向用户 全球多市场可投，灵活选择 🤝 现开放 B 端代理合作 ✦ 稀缺资源，先到先占 ✦ 有担保有对接，降低试错成本 想了解合作细节？直接联系 ⬇️ 📩 [联系方式] @RStan_BCDB 🌍人脉｜合作｜资源流通🌍，一站全配 博创不只同行，更与您连结未来！ 博创集团 × 一站式出海创业伙伴 ✍️中国支付 : https://t.me/BCDBGXPD ✈️多国支付：https://t.me/BCDB_DGZF 💼集团资讯：https://t.m
❤1
🥰博创集团🥰 随时提供优秀产品及优质服务，以合理成本和客制化解决方案达成合作，让博创成为您产业快速发展中的桥梁！🎖🎖 三方支付通道/各国支付/备付金代付/换汇，安全有保障，老品牌为您专人专群提供一条龙服务🔍 🌍人脉｜合作｜资源流通🌍，一站全配 博创不只同行，更与您连结未来！ 博创集团 × 一站式出海创业伙伴 ✍️中国支付 : https://t.me/BCDBGXPD ✈️多国支付：https://t.me/BCDB_DGZF 💼集团资讯：https://t.me/BCDBGP
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @BCDBGP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 110,642 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“博创担保 - 集团频道” (@BCDBGP), 572 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BCDBGP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.