Channel
@BCKB888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
45subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001512062814 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BCKB888 |
| Description | 博创快报资讯社区，数十万中文博彩从业者的根据地，整合博彩业优质资源，每天更新最实用博彩资讯和内容，独家提供最靠谱的博彩支付产品，让你足不出户即可掌握博彩动态，对接博彩业务！ 博创新闻观点导航：https://t.me/bochuangdh2 博创商业信息群组导航：https://t.me/BOCHUANGDH4 博创生活信息群组导航：https://t.me/BOCHUANGDH3 博创聊天群组导航：https://t.me/BOCHUANGDH |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 22 September 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BCKB888 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 45 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 45 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 22 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 October 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2022 to 26 October 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
‼️ 博创担保公告：勿轻信自称与博创合作之陌生人 ‼️ 致 各位尊敬的商户： 近日，公司同仁接获通知，表示有支付商在外以"与博创担保有合作"为说辞，骗取合作方信任，进行交易后却宣称手下车队跑路，试图对赔付不了了之。 博创担保提醒，公司支付担保频道（国内支付 @BCDB_PAY / 多国支付 @BCDB_DGZF ）提供支付商资讯"免费上架"，并不会提前对这些厂商收取押金，所以仅仅在频道上架资讯，也不适合成为我司为这些通道信用背书的佐证。 事实上，我司亦有公告表示，上架登录之C级牌通道为"新接入或尚未深度合作的支付通道"，交易时仍应保有行走行业需具备之基本戒心。 此外，我司实际交易采"一户一押"模式，仅在官方工作人员开设担保群后，才会在交易双方共同见证下，向支付商收取押金。绝无与支付商事先收取押金，便对支付商江湖走跳中一切行为作担保的可能。 所以我司再次提倡，即便是我司推荐之A级、S级通道，也应当通过完整担保程序，由博…
#西港沉船事件揭开了境外灰产与大陆的紧密关联（3） 为何有人不断偷渡？ 偷渡的风险高，但偷渡成功的收益也很高，尤其是对于社会底层的中国人来说，偷渡一直是一个改变命运的机会。 在大陆改革开放之前，大陆很多地方吃不饱穿不暖，连现在的特区深圳也只是一个荒凉破败的小渔村，而一河之隔的香港却已经是梦幻之城，于是众多活不下去的大陆人选择偷渡到香港，特别是一些已经身处香港的人将大量现金寄回大陆后，更刺激了无数人前往香港，最后逐渐演变为著名的“大逃港”。 根据相关记载，无数大陆人在“大逃港”过程中被鲨鱼咬死、游泳气力不足淹死、跳火车时摔死、在偷渡过程中与解放军以及英国隆尔喀佣兵、华人兵纠缠中被打死，根据电影《打蛇》的资料搜集，不少人还遭香港黑社会强奸、斩杀，最后大约200万至250万人成功越过边防线偷渡至香港市区。 仅仅1962年的“大逃港”，每天就有约五千人偷渡，短短一个月便偷渡越境十五万人。 改革开放之后，中国的社会状况逐渐好转…
#西港沉船事件揭开了境外灰产与大陆的紧密关联（2） 偷渡难道依旧猖獗？ 根据“海恩法则”的理论：每一起严重事故的背后，必然有29次轻微事故和300起未遂先兆，以及1000起事故隐患。 这是否说明古老的偷渡产业并没有被断绝，大陆的边境管控也不像政府宣传的那么严格？ 答案是显而易见的，因为西港沉船事件就充分说明了一切，将政府以往尽力维持的秘密曝光在公众视野内。 这起事件就相当于在打中国政府的脸，对中国所有过往标榜的直接否定，如果这个新闻扩散开来让更多人知道，可能会造成非常恶劣的影响，可能会被人大做文章揪着不放，也可能会让更多人效仿。 熟悉博彩业招聘情况的人，应该都很清楚一些小公司或者极度缺人的公司会用各种方法招人，包括骗招、绑架、人口买卖等，博彩业现如今猖獗的绑架行为、非法拘禁行为、人口贩卖行为都与此有关，这些公司仿佛毒瘤一般的存在。 除了这些破坏行业生态的犯罪式招聘手段外，这些公司还有个常用的招聘方法——安排国内的应…
#西港沉船事件揭开了境外灰产与大陆的紧密关联（上篇） 西港偷渡事件，震惊灰产圈 9月22日下午，西港地区发生了一起沉船事故，一艘满载41名中国人（3名女子）的渔船因设备故障突然沉没。西港香港部门当时救起在海上漂泊的18名中国人，另23名中国人（3名女子）落海失踪，救援队已经展开搜救工作。 这么一则突然出现的新闻在9月底突然引爆了整个中文博彩业，柬埔寨当局和当地的中国救援组织也高度重视，就连一直和当地中国人撇清关系的大使馆也被惊动，立刻派人前往西港组织力量进行救援，在各方协作下，随后几天又救出了一部分中国人，但仍有8名中国人失踪，3名中国人遇难。 根据被救起的中国人的说法，他们是在广东登船偷渡，然后在公海上转乘其他船只，在靠近西港时又更换了另一艘渔船，准备在西港登陆，但因为船只故障而被抛弃在船上，柬埔寨当地的船员们则弃船跑路。 至于他们偷渡的目的，这些偷渡客给出的说法是被诱骗上船，他们要来西港捕鱼。 对此说法，博彩圈和…
👍1
#菲律宾严打持续到12月，多少菜农将成为业绩（下篇） 隐私一旦泄露，回国铁证如山 大陆警方按照“良民证”的信息进行精准抓人的推测并非是空穴来风，也是众多菠菜从业者的担忧。 在菲律宾这个贪婪腐败的国度里，手握权柄的官员们无一不是肥头大耳，最擅长的就是贪污受贿和利益交换，区区外国人的资料，还是中国人的资料，在他们眼里就真的只是捞钱的筹码而已。 而大陆警方的破案能力就不用多说了，只要有了突破点，就可以用无数种办法将菜农的嘴撬开，包括但不限于将菜农在国外做过的所有坏事甚至是曾经的同事、上司、老板等信息全都掌握。 一些公司和菜农已经意识到了这个问题，并且在想办法规避这个问题，但就当前中文博彩市场的情况来看，想要找到规避办法并不容易。 因为柬埔寨整治网络博彩的行动更加疯狂，抓捕的菜农人数已经远高于菲律宾政府，而迪拜地区的环境已不适用于博彩发展，至于泰国虽然风头正劲，但泰国法律对于博彩的天然限制性已经制约了它的市场容量，现有的博彩…
#菲律宾严打持续到12月，多少菜农将成为业绩（上篇） 菲律宾掀起严打，NBI将大肆抓捕 在之前的文章中，我们讲到一个博彩圈的奇怪现象——柬埔寨每次严打的重锤，都会砸在菲律宾菜农身上，被柬埔寨政府驱赶走的犯罪分子们在肆虐菲律宾1个月左右之后，终于成功的引起了菲律宾政府的注意，也让菲律宾的博彩业陷入史无前例的严打氛围中。 近日菲律宾高官密集发声，酝酿的压力连最迟钝的菜农和最嚣张的绑匪都已经感受到。 就在9月26日，菲律宾媒体率先透露，称菲律宾政府将在 10 月开启相关执法行动，并将在2022年底之前逮捕一大批涉及网络菠菜业的中国公民，在具体人数方面，菲律宾媒体引用司法部长雷穆拉的话，称希望在10月中旬能够驱逐约2000至3000名中国菠菜从业者。 在7月之前，因为NBI在针对中国博彩公司的相关行动中总是伴随有违法行为，比如盗窃、抢劫、勒索等，因此司法部长曾叫停了NBI的所有针对博彩公司的行动，但在近日的新闻中，菲律宾司法部…
#唠唠狗狗币教父Elon Musk的那些事 所谓喊水会结冰，一个男人、一则推文，就可以影响几千亿的市值，说什么涨什么就涨，说什么跌什么就跌，这到底是个什么概念？ 今天要来聊聊的就是这个男人：Elon Musk。 Elon Musk有100000000+个粉丝，曾经有媒体表示，继西泽大帝之后，没有人可以像他一样创造或毁灭几千亿的市值；2017年有网友说Elon Musk就是创造比特币的人，Elon Musk当时回应说他才不是咧，他有个朋友给他0.25颗的比特币，被他不知道扔哪去了…… 2018年，Elon Musk表示自己除了人家送的0.25颗比特币之外，没有别的加密货币，然后有个网友tag马斯克，说你应该要当狗狗币的执行长，马斯克随即表示狗狗币是他最喜欢的加密货币，蛮酷的……接下来，狗狗币的涨幅那个夸张唷……2019年4月30号，马斯克突然发文，全文就三个字：以太币，然后他又马上发文：开玩笑的。 2020年7月，马斯克…
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @BCKB888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,091,482 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@BCKB888 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“【博创快报】编辑原创频道” (@BCKB888), 45 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BCKB888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.