Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Азарёнок. СТВ. Беларусь

@AzarenokCTV

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

15,778subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001574310187
TypeChannel
Username@AzarenokCTV
Created23 September 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AzarenokCTV

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

15,77815,79915,788.56 August 2026 — 15,799 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,799 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,793 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,791 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,786 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,783 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,778 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,775–15,802 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:0215,778-5
11 Aug 2026, 00:4415,783-3
9 Aug 2026, 01:5115,786-5
8 Aug 2026, 00:4815,791-2
6 Aug 2026, 21:4515,793-6
6 Aug 2026, 02:2015,799no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:4815,799first reading

Engagement

103 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 15,778 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,620
103 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
103
of 103 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held103 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total166,611
Reactions total5,722
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
28,700
Videos
26,800
Links
34,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
49m 53s
Average length
2m 00s

Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,676 reactions across 84 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,17325.1%
💯84218.0%
68314.6%
😁48610.4%
🤡3737.98%
🔥2505.35%
💩1813.87%
🖕1443.08%
👏1162.48%
🤮921.97%
💊881.88%
🤬521.11%
❤‍🔥260.556%
🙏260.556%
🤣260.556%
🥱220.47%
🤯200.428%
😈160.342%
😡80.171%
🥰80.171%
20 further kinds440.941%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 103 of the 103 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,722reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC888 views44 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Свежая колонка в Минской Правде. Венок экстремистам Но кто из нас годится в судьи – Решать, кто прав, кто виноват? О людях речь идёт, а люди Богов не сами ли творят? Так говорил Александр Твардовский, подводя итоги своей сложной, насыщенной, героической жизни. И говорил в разгар всеобщего «судейства». Когда демократы с одной прямой извилиной и тремя диссертациями «о роли партии в надоях» вдруг взялись судить правит

👏229👍5🤮4💩2🤡1🙏1

12 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,110 views37 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Тю...просто свидетель на свадьбе. Ну птичек любит

😈14🤬12💩5🥰3🤡1🤯1🥱1

12 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC≈1,080 views41 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Минусы будут?

😁34💩31👏1🤔1🤡1

12 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC≈1,080 views52 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Конечно. Куда нам до квитнючай Украины. Там целый список, до кого нам ещё на карачках ползти - великие прибалтийские тигры, Молдова с Румынией, Греция и вообще вся Южная Европа - один сплошной рай, вот только работы нет. Любой западный рейтинг и помоки, которые его разносят, можно сразу сливать в утиль

💯43😁3👍2👏1💩1🤡1🤣1

12 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC≈1,120 views58 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Хохлы отжимаются на похоронах ВСУ-шника. Но и даже эта дичь у них - копированная. Так делали американские субкультурщики 90-ых

💊34🤯12👍5💩4💯21

12 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC≈1,250 views60 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Свежая колонка в Минской Правде. Яблоко раздавить, червей выгнать Я не люблю, когда наполовину Или когда прервали разговор. А сейчас у нас всё время как будто наполовину. Ну а разговор, большой наш разговор с этим миром, прервали ещё в 1991 году. Теперь всё больше переругиваемся. А ещё пришло ведь время называть вещи своими именами? В этот век ужимок, ничего не значащих полуслов типа «демократия», в это время тота

💯44💩86🔥1🤡1

12 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈1,230 views36 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Срацi у́ дзiрку

😁32💩3💊1

12 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC≈1,240 views52 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Литва выделит 50 млн евро на создание противотанковых рвов у границ с Россией и Беларусью В правительстве страны уточнили: на отдельных участках ширина таких сооружений достигнет 150 метров. Скоро вся Литва будет одной большой выгребной ямой

💯405🥱3😁2💩1🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈1,370 views53 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Вы будете смеяться, но Фредыч снова победил Иран

😁42🤡3💩2🔥2🤣1🤯1🥱1🥴1

12 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC≈1,810 views60 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Старая гендер-лесбуха Наста Базар может попробовать сношаться с общественным туалетом в центре Варшавы с криком "ялда, сыходзь"! Вдруг поможет😂

😁44🤣9🖕4💩2💊1

12 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,760 views52 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Дорогому Николаю Петровичу Бурляеву - земной поклон И вот прекрасная статья Да, были люди в наше время. И они здесь - с нами! https://t.me/literaturnayagazeta/10972

38👏6💊5🌭2💩1

12 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,780 views46 reactionsread 13 August 2026

А я напомню, что у иранцев вообще НЕТ бомбоубежищ. И когда я спросил о них - сопровождающие местные немного обиделись. Мученик аятолла Хаменеи знал об атаке, но не предпринимал никаких мер, чтобы спрятаться. А Фредыча вот - возят как тушку https://t.me/shpakouski/8685

💯32🤡73😁3💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @AzarenokCTV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@AzarenokCTV edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 16,949 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

БУТ ГОВОРИТ
@boutspeech · 469
9 posts
БУДЬ В ТЕМЕ ️
@budz_v_teme · 434
6 posts
СЕРГЕЙ ЛУЩ | В СОЮZЕ
@slusch · 211
4 posts
Paganus
@paganusOK · 101
3 posts
Петровский. Власть
@piatrouski · 1,082
3 posts
Васильковая Беларусь
@VasilekBelarus · 20
3 posts
Людажоры
@Ludazhors · 2,792
2 posts
ЖС. Образование
@zachisleno1 · 1,341
2 posts
ЖС Premium
@zheltye_slivy_Belarus · 38,736
2 posts
Папины сказки
@daddys_tales · 73
1 post
Дзермант
@dzermant · 8,450
1 post
Ебанатика - наука точная
@ebanatics · 313
1 post
Гайдукевич Олег
@gajdukevichh · 35,813
1 post
ГлавРед Янтурина
@GlavRed_Yanturina · 8,057
1 post
Дочь полковника
@juliethefiregirl · 401
1 post
Людмила Гладкая. СБ
@lgbelarussegodnya · 3,050
1 post
Все пропало?
@nevsepropalo · 306
1 post
Николай Емелин. Песни Сильных Духом.
@nikolayemelin · 827
1 post
Андрей Кулябкин. Видный отечественный блоггер.
@slavydeal · 144
1 post
💥Надежда Королёва(Филипенко)💣 🕊Оршанская Ябатька🇧🇾
@tatyana_belaruska · 70
1 post
Тутэйшие
@tuteishie · 9
1 post
Вечерний Могилев
@vecherniymogilev · 207
1 post
Vindemiatrix_art
@vindemiatrix_art · 1,711
1 post
Во Благо Руси!
@voblagorus · 121
1 post
🇧🇾За нашу Беларусь!🇧🇾
@zabelshklov · 29
1 post
СТАРШИЙ ПРАПОР #КРП
@ze_knight · 898
1 post
ИПХ /Z/
@ZIntelligent · 7
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Азарёнок. СТВ. Беларусь” (@AzarenokCTV), 15,778 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AzarenokCTV.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.