Channel
@gladkaya_sb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
125subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001681610332 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gladkaya_sb |
| Description | Здесь вы можете предложить новость. @news_gladkaya_bot |
| Created | 15 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gladkaya_sb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 125 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 125 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
А какая была проблема с начислением заработной платы и получением вознаграждений? Вроде никаких проблем не было, директор решал эти проблемы. 📣 Президент о том, кто должен отвечать за зарплаты.
📣 Новое явление в независимой Беларуси - институт управляющих. ⁉️Первый поставил вопросы: ▫️Откуда сие явление пришло в Беларусь? ▫️Что оно означает? ▫️Зачем оно нам?
⚡️ Григорий Азарёнок: Не Трампу нужна война с Ираном ЛЕТУЧКА ЗДЕСЬ
🤡Деньги на ветер... перемен. Варшава и ее агитки на 15 млн долларов Кстати, граждане Польши их уже выставляют на аукцион. Ну чтоб хоть что-то поиметь с коррупционных схем своего режима. 💥СМОТРИТЕ ЛЕТУЧКУ
https://youtu.be/sSJauYrd5Vw
57-летний москвич получил 18 лет за попытку устроить диверсию на железной дороге в Подмосковье Житель Москвы Николай Маковский стал участником группы под руководством ГУР Украины. Ему дали задание устроить диверсию на ж/д путях. Для этого ему передали специальный "башмак" - устройство для снятия с путей неконтролируемо движущихся составов. С помощью данного устройства мужчина должен был устроить крушение грузового…
Европейские политимпотенты симулируют "вторжение России в Литву" The Wall Street Journal пишет, что в результате разыгранного сценария Россия силами 15 тысяч человек за минимальный срок взяла под контроль всю Прибалтику, начав с литовского Мариямполя. Европейцы предполагают, что США в случае "нападения" России на страны Балтии не станут применять 5-ю статью устава НАТО, а интерпретируют выдвижение войск из Калининг…
☝️Трамп строит внутреннюю оборону. Финальный бой близко? 💥Летучка здесь: YouTube | OK | VK Видео | Telegram| VIDEOBEL.BY | Rutube| SB.BY
🙈ЕС готовы отдаться Штатам личные данные европейцев. И помочь тем самым Америке создать инструмент для фильтрации нежелательных для Вашингтона людей. 🔔Об этом и не только - в ЛЕТУЧКЕ❗️
🔥У Польши - фантомные боли империи. Прибалты отболели, теперь их задача - спровоцировать нас СМОТРИ ЛЕТУЧКУ😉
😂Гордые прибалты договорились "оборонять" друг друга. Где-то это уже было... Рассказывает Глеб Лавров. ЛЕТУЧКА здесь
⚡️Понеслась! ЛЕТУЧКА- горячая штучка💥 Далучайся❗️
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gladkaya_sb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 878,390 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@gladkaya_sb named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Людмила Гладкая. СБ.Беларусь сегодня” (@gladkaya_sb), 125 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gladkaya_sb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.