Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝔍𝔒π”₯π”¬π”³π”žπ”₯'𝔰 π”‰π”žπ”©π”°π”’ π”šπ”¦π”±π”«π”’π”°π”°π”’π”° [π”Έπ•Ÿπ•₯π•š-π•π•Ž]

@Anti_JW

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

461subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001742416966
TypeChannel
Username@Anti_JW
DescriptionThe Official Telegram Channel of Anti Jehovah Witnesses Join the friend channels get meme-warfare ammunition: @EndinessCompendium
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Anti_JW

Growth

4616 Aug 2026, 17:19 β€” 461 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:04 β€” 461 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 17:196 Aug 2026, 19:04
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 460–462 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 19:04461no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:19461first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 September 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
20.8%
avg views Γ· 461 subscribers
Avg views / post
96.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
β€”
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held20 (8 September 2025 – 27 July 2026)
Views total192
Reactions totalβ€”
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
103
Videos
108
Links
193

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀1123.9%
😁817.4%
πŸ”₯613.0%
πŸ†510.9%
πŸ‘510.9%
❀‍πŸ”₯24.35%
πŸŽ‰24.35%
🐳24.35%
πŸ—Ώ24.35%
😱24.35%
⚑12.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 07:23 UTC67 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AntiModernVersionsVideo

Westcott and Hort’s Occult Connections - Dr. Phil Stringer Dr. Phil Stringer exposes the occult connections and practices of the men [including Westcott& Hort] behind the Critical text of modern versions. YT Link https://www.kjbrc.org/wescott-and-hort-and-their-occult-connections/ Follow Anti Modern Versions @AntiModernVersions

19 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC125 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

🍿 Banned anti-Jehovah's Witness cartoon describing their beliefs (1980s) πŸ”— [ YT Version ] 𝔍𝔒π”₯π”¬π”³π”žπ”₯'𝔰 π”‰π”žπ”©π”°π”’ π”šπ”¦π”±π”«π”’π”°π”°π”’π”°

28 May 2026, 23:53 UTC186 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Wait for it... 𝔍𝔒π”₯π”¬π”³π”žπ”₯'𝔰 π”‰π”žπ”©π”°π”’ π”šπ”¦π”±π”«π”’π”°π”°π”’π”°

28 May 2026, 23:53 UTC246 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

BOOM! No soul sleep 𝔍𝔒π”₯π”¬π”³π”žπ”₯'𝔰 π”‰π”žπ”©π”°π”’ π”šπ”¦π”±π”«π”’π”°π”°π”’π”°

πŸ†5

28 May 2026, 16:51 UTC169 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

𝔍𝔒π”₯π”¬π”³π”žπ”₯'𝔰 π”‰π”žπ”©π”°π”’ π”šπ”¦π”±π”«π”’π”°π”°π”’π”°

21 May 2026, 09:04 UTC185 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AntiJudaismReloadedPhoto

Who says Jesus Christ is God? π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•΅π–šπ–‰π–†π–Žπ–˜π–’ (ℝ𝕖𝕝𝕠𝕒𝕕𝕖𝕕)

❀4

22 Feb 2026, 09:50 UTC369 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

𝔍𝔒π”₯π”¬π”³π”žπ”₯'𝔰 π”‰π”žπ”©π”°π”’ π”šπ”¦π”±π”«π”’π”°π”°π”’π”°

😁8❀‍πŸ”₯2πŸ—Ώ1

1 Feb 2026, 04:49 UTC436 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @incorrectpollsPoll

Would you actually enjoy this?

  1. Yes, and I would just watch from a safe distance28%
  2. Yes, but I would help17%
  3. No, but I wouldn't risk my own skin to help him20%
  4. No, so I would go to help him35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Jan 2026, 06:24 UTC395 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

Jesus Is Not Michael The Archangel Pastor Jared Pozarnsky 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”π”žπ”°π”¬π”«π”―π”Ά | 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”šπ”―π”¬π”«π”€ π”‡π”žπ”Ά 𝔄𝔑𝔳𝔒𝔫𝔱𝔦𝔰π”ͺ 𝔍𝔒π”₯π”¬π”³π”žπ”₯'𝔰 π”‰π”žπ”©π”°π”’ π”šπ”¦π”±π”«π”’π”°π”°π”’π”°

17 Nov 2025, 19:26 UTC464 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

𝔍𝔒π”₯π”¬π”³π”žπ”₯'𝔰 π”‰π”žπ”©π”°π”’ π”šπ”¦π”±π”«π”’π”°π”°π”’π”° | 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”π”žπ”°π”¬π”«π”―π”Ά

🐳2πŸŽ‰1

16 Nov 2025, 19:26 UTC419 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

The grave of Charles Taze Russel (founder of JW) The watchtower has a pyramid altar right in front of the gravestone and the cemetery is essentially in the front yard of a Masonic temple ____ πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Έ La tumba de Charles Taze Russel (fundador de JW) Watchtower tiene una piramide frente a la lΓ‘pida y el cementerio estΓ‘ esencialmente en el patio delantero de un templo masΓ³nico ____ πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Ή O tΓΊmulo de Charles Taze Russel (…

πŸ”₯6πŸŽ‰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Anti_JW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Feb 2026, 04:49 UTCAnonymous Poll182 voters

Would you actually enjoy this?

  1. Yes, and I would just watch from a safe distance28%
  2. Yes, but I would help17%
  3. No, but I wouldn't risk my own skin to help him20%
  4. No, so I would go to help him35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only β€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2025 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 977,028 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ”π”’π”₯π”¬π”³π”žπ”₯'𝔰 π”‰π”žπ”©π”°π”’ π”šπ”¦π”±π”«π”’π”°π”°π”’π”° [π”Έπ•Ÿπ•₯π•š-π•π•Ž]” (@Anti_JW), 461 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Anti_JW.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.