π¬πππ πΈπππππ ππππππππ

Channel
π¬πππ πΈπππππ ππππππππ (Anti Modern Versions - The KJB/The KJV Versus The Modern Versions)
@AntiModernVersions
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
1,630subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002095295132 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AntiModernVersions |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AntiModernVersions |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 1,630 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 1,625 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 1,626 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 1,628 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 10.6%
- avg views Γ· 1,630 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 174
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.78%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 July 2026 β 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,470 |
| Reactions total | 44 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
44 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 13 | 29.5% | |
| β€ | 7 | 15.9% | |
| π― | 6 | 13.6% | |
| β‘ | 5 | 11.4% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 5 | 11.4% | |
| π₯ | 5 | 11.4% | |
| β | 3 | 6.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Basically, the ESV severely wrests and twists Revelation 13:16 in many sneaky ways just as how sneaky foxes or ravening wolves would twist Scripture, affecting all of Revelation 13 in very absurd, errorneous ways, and the ESV lies and makes very huge changes that have massive, serious implications, push numerous problems/errors and both go against Scripture and turn God's words into a contradiction filled with errorsβ¦
β€βπ₯4
The pictures' comparsion of ESV VS KJB in Revelation 13:16 will be sent today or the next day.
In Revelation 13:16, the ESV changes and twists "in" into "on" in relation to the mark of the beast & creates many errors and contradictions in Revelation 13: ~ Revelation 13:16 1611 KJB β π― π π 16 And he causeth all, both smal and great rich and poore, free and bond, to receiue a marke in their right hand, or in their foreheads: ~ Revelation 13:16 ESV β π¨ π± β οΈ 16 Also it causes all, both small and great, both ricβ¦
π¬πππ ππππ ππ π°ππππ
Refuting the claim that the Masoretic Text talks about the Preservation of People and NOT the Presevation of SCRIPTURE Would God leave Humanity without perfect words where they will be filled with doubt? Or will he fill them with a perfect message that cannot be tampered by the enemy? Let's look at the underlying Masoretic text of the KJB in Psalms 12:7. In this whole chapter we can see a clear pattern where in theβ¦
β3π₯3
Even after seeing so much evidence in every way possible - biblically (supremely and most importantly) & historically & linguistically & comparatively - that points to the King James Bible as being God's preserved, translated, inspired, trustworthy, 100% accurate, perfect Word for those who speak and/or read and/or read in English, it is both truly unscholarly and very hard/ extremely hard to deny that the KJB/KJV/Kiβ¦
β‘2β€βπ₯1π₯1
Debunking Internet Lies & False Accusations that claim "the KJB's underlying sources' editions did not use a lot of manuscripts & did not use any ancient manuscripts": ππ» This claim is really about attacking both the manuscripts behind those collated editions that collated the manuscripts & the collated editions underlying the KJB. By attacking them, modern versionists+fake pseudoscholars think they can discredit thβ¦
Famous Freemason Manly P. Hall is against and attacks King James I, the King James Bible, KJB Believers, and Christians. In Hall's βAsia in the Balance of the Scalesβ by Manly Palmer Hall, in Horizon: The Magazine of Useful and Intelligent Living, Spring, Volume 4, No. 1, April 1944, Manly P. Hall attacks KJB, King James I, & King James Bible Believers & promoted the strawman fallacy of the King James Bible being vβ¦
β‘3
π π¬πππ πΈπππππ ππππππππ π
π2
Billy Graham's "Evangelistic" Association/BGEA promoted 3 Lies (while Graham was alive, he's complict): π₯ 1) Falsely claims Vaticanus+Sinaiticus are advantageous+reliable+"older=better": "modern translators have the advantage of using many older Greek manuscripts of the New Testament discovered..Most scholars consider these older manuscripts more reliable than the few later manuscripts available to those who translaβ¦
β€1π₯1
π π¬πππ πΈπππππ ππππππππ π
π2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AntiModernVersions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
In English, which is God's preserved, translated, inspired Scriptures:
- A. The King James Bible89%
- B. The "New" "International" Verison2%
- C. The "New American" "Standard" Bible2%
- D. The English "Standard" Version0%
- E. Other3%
- F. No Bible in English5%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 179,837 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Cultvinist Β· 6152 postsππ’π₯π¬π³ππ₯'π° πππ©π°π’ ππ¦π±π«π’π°π°π’π° [πΈππ₯π-ππ]
@Anti_JW Β· 4611 postππ«π±π¦ βπ’ππ―π’π΄ βπ¬π¬π±π°
@antihebrewroots Β· 9241 postππ«π±π¦-ππ’π«π±π’π π¬π°π±ππ©π¦π°πͺ
@AntiPentecostal Β· 5541 postππ π£ππ€-πΉππ€ππ ππππ§ππ₯ππ πππ€π₯
@AntiWorksSalvation Β· 9771 postπππππ πππππ πΈππππ
@BasedBibleMemes Β· 5471 postπ π¦ππ©π¦π ππ© π½πΌ
@BiblicalFE Β· 3,3691 postπ¬πππ ππππ ππ π°ππππ
@falsebookofenoch Β· 6581 postURFRIENDLYHOOD
@urfriendlyhood Β· 881 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@ChristianSpreadsheetCamp Β· 4931 postπ°πππππππ πΊπ π΅ππππ π¬ππ πΏππ πππππ
@EvidenceOfJesusandTheBible Β· 7531 postπ¬πππ ππππ ππ π°ππππ
@falsebookofenoch Β· 6581 postπππ βπππ ππππ πππππ€ π
@TheRealKingJamesI Β· 4251 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@antihebrewroots Β· 9242 postsβπ²π©π±π³π¦π«π¦π°πͺγ πΈππ₯π βπππ§ππππ€π γ
@Cultvinist Β· 6152 postsπ¬πππ ππππ ππ π°ππππ
@falsebookofenoch Β· 6582 postsπΎπ π₯ βπ¦ππ€π₯ππ ππ€ πΌπβπππΌπ» (πΈππ₯π πΎπ π₯ βπ¦ππ€π₯ππ ππ€)
@GotQuestionsEXPOSED Β· 1122 postsππ’π₯π¬π³ππ₯'π° πππ©π°π’ ππ¦π±π«π’π°π°π’π° [πΈππ₯π-ππ]
@Anti_JW Β· 4611 postππ«π±π¦-ππ’π«π±π’π π¬π°π±ππ©π¦π°πͺ
@AntiPentecostal Β· 5541 postππ π£ππ€-πΉππ€ππ ππππ§ππ₯ππ πππ€π₯
@AntiWorksSalvation Β· 9771 postπππππ πππππ πΈππππ
@BasedBibleMemes Β· 5471 postπ π¦ππ©π¦π ππ© π½πΌ
@BiblicalFE Β· 3,3691 postRecommended Bible Translations
@recommendedbibletranslations Β· 801 postURFRIENDLYHOOD
@urfriendlyhood Β· 881 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@EvidenceOfJesusandTheBible Β· 7531 postπ¬πππ ππππ ππ π°ππππ
@falsebookofenoch Β· 6581 postπππ βπππ ππππ πππππ€ π
@TheRealKingJamesI Β· 4251 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ¬πππ πΈπππππ ππππππππ (Anti Modern Versions - The KJB/The KJV Versus The Modern Versions)β (@AntiModernVersions), 1,630 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AntiModernVersions.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.