Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐Ÿ“Š Politically Incorrect Polls

Channel

๐Ÿ“Š Politically Incorrect Polls

@incorrectpolls

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

1,862subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001950600524
TypeChannel
Username@incorrectpolls
Created18 September 2023 โ€” measured โ€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/incorrectpolls

Topic

Other / unclassifiable โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8431,8951,8696 August 2026 โ€” 1,847 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 1,847 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 1,843 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 1,857 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 1,858 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 1,864 subscribers22 August 2026 โ€” 1,877 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 1,882 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 1,889 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 1,895 subscribers8 September 2026 โ€” 1,875 subscribers12 September 2026 โ€” 1,870 subscribers27 September 2026 โ€” 1,862 subscribers1,8626 August 202627 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 52 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 1,835โ€“1,903 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 09:351,862-8
12 Sept 2026, 07:391,870-5
8 Sept 2026, 07:561,875-20
31 Aug 2026, 02:151,895+6
28 Aug 2026, 06:381,889+7
25 Aug 2026, 15:181,882+5
22 Aug 2026, 18:071,877+13
19 Aug 2026, 10:571,864+6
12 Aug 2026, 20:441,858+1
9 Aug 2026, 21:311,857+14
7 Aug 2026, 03:571,843-4
6 Aug 2026, 06:481,847no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:351,847first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 05s
Average length
1m 42s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

191 reactions across 17 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ˜7036.6%
๐Ÿ‘ป2613.6%
๐Ÿคฃ2412.6%
โšก105.24%
๐Ÿ‘Ž84.19%
๐ŸŒš63.14%
๐Ÿ”ฅ63.14%
๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚63.14%
โค52.62%
๐Ÿฅด52.62%
๐Ÿคก42.09%
๐Ÿ‘31.57%
๐Ÿ˜Ž31.57%
๐Ÿคจ31.57%
๐Ÿคฉ31.57%
๐Ÿ—ฟ21.05%
๐Ÿ˜10.524%
๐Ÿ˜จ10.524%
๐Ÿ˜ด10.524%
๐Ÿ™ˆ10.524%
3 further kinds31.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 197 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC117 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @EndinessCompendiumVideo

๐”ˆ๐”ซ๐”ก๐”ฆ๐”ซ๐”ข๐”ฐ๐”ฐ โ„ญ๐”ฌ๐”ช๐”ญ๐”ข๐”ซ๐”ก๐”ฆ๐”ฒ๐”ช

๐Ÿคฃ7๐Ÿคฉ3๐Ÿ˜Ž3๐Ÿ—ฟ2๐Ÿ˜1

5 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC143 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @antiquitecharchivePhoto

OPEN CHALLENGE โ€” What is This Word? What you are seeing is my own handwriting. The person I sent this to couldn't read this specific word. No one else I sent it to could either. So I'm putting it up as an open challenge. If you can read this word and tell me what it is, you will receive admin privs in all of my chats. Yes, this is a real English word. No, this is not an obscure word. No, this is not more than one โ€ฆ

๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚6๐Ÿ˜5๐Ÿฅฑ1

4 Aug 2026, 01:22 UTC234 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

For the low-IQ, this verse means 20%

๐Ÿ˜23๐Ÿคฃ4๐Ÿคฏ1

4 Aug 2026, 01:19 UTC261 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Do you pay more or less taxes than Egyptian slaves?

  1. I pay more taxes than Egyptian slaves80%
  2. I pay less taxes than Egyptian slaves20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

โšก7

3 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC198 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @AntiDispensationalismVideo

๐”„๐”ซ๐”ฑ๐”ฆ ๐”‡๐”ฆ๐”ฐ๐”ญ๐”ข๐”ซ๐”ฐ๐”ž๐”ฑ๐”ฆ๐”ฌ๐”ซ๐”ž๐”ฉ๐”ฆ๐”ฐ๐”ช

๐Ÿ˜13โค3

3 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC208 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

๐•‚๐•๐• โ„๐•’๐••๐•š๐• 

๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘1

2 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTC259 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Would you have fellowship with Catholics?

  1. Yes, as long as they're white. Doesn't matter if they hate whites3%
  2. Yes, as long as they're white but they'll have to be prowhite73%
  3. No, why should I have fellowship with an enemy25%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

๐Ÿ‘1

2 Aug 2026, 02:07 UTC292 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Are you:

  1. Baptist/IFB13%
  2. Catholic / Protestant34%
  3. Judaizer &/or Zionist6%
  4. Other47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

๐Ÿคจ3

1 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC294 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Is this video real?

  1. Yes. Roblox's staff must be provided more photos of children in order to fix this issue19%
  2. No. The video is clearly fake and is an excuse to collect more photos of children for "verification"81%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC274 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Are you oppressed more by the:

  1. Bottom 1%33%
  2. Top 1%67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

๐Ÿคฃ7

31 Jul 2026, 21:06 UTC254 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @AntiPreterismPhoto

๐•ป๐–—๐–Š๐–™๐–†๐–—๐–‰๐–Ž๐–˜๐–’ใ€˜ ๐”ธ๐•Ÿ๐•ฅ๐•š โ„™๐•ฃ๐•–๐•ฅ๐•–๐•ฃ๐•š๐•ค๐•ž ใ€™

๐Ÿ˜17

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @incorrectpolls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 01:19 UTCAnonymous Poll129 voters

Do you pay more or less taxes than Egyptian slaves?

  1. I pay more taxes than Egyptian slaves80%
  2. I pay less taxes than Egyptian slaves20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTCAnonymous Poll110 voters

Would you have fellowship with Catholics?

  1. Yes, as long as they're white. Doesn't matter if they hate whites3%
  2. Yes, as long as they're white but they'll have to be prowhite73%
  3. No, why should I have fellowship with an enemy25%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Aug 2026, 02:07 UTCAnonymous Poll142 voters

Are you:

  1. Baptist/IFB13%
  2. Catholic / Protestant34%
  3. Judaizer &/or Zionist6%
  4. Other47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTCAnonymous Poll73 voters

Is this video real?

  1. Yes. Roblox's staff must be provided more photos of children in order to fix this issue19%
  2. No. The video is clearly fake and is an excuse to collect more photos of children for "verification"81%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTCAnonymous Poll135 voters

Are you oppressed more by the:

  1. Bottom 1%33%
  2. Top 1%67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTCAnonymous Poll73 voters

Is this real

  1. Yes15%
  2. No85%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

๐”—๐”ฅ๐”ข ๐”‰๐”ฌ๐”ฏ๐”Ÿ๐”ฆ๐”ก๐”ก๐”ข๐”ซ ๐”‰๐”ฏ๐”ฒ๐”ฆ๐”ฑ
@BiblicalTeetotalism ยท 29
2 posts
โ„ญ๐”ณ๐” ๐”จ๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ฌ๐”ฉ๐”ฆ๐” ๐”ฆ๐”ฐ๐”ช
@Cvcktholicism ยท 969
2 posts
๐•ฟ๐–๐–Š ๐•ฎ๐–”๐–“๐–‹๐–š๐–˜๐–Ž๐–”๐–“ ๐–”๐–‹ ๐–™๐–๐–Š ๐•ฑ๐–†๐–ˆ๐–Š๐–˜
@TheConfusionoftheFaces ยท 231
2 posts
๐”„๐”ซ๐”ฑ๐”ฆ ๐”…๐”ฒ๐”ก๐”ก๐”ฅ๐”ฆ๐”ฐ๐”ช
@AntiBuddhism ยท 542
1 post
๐”„๐”ซ๐”ฑ๐”ฆ ๐”ˆ๐”ณ๐”ฌ๐”ฉ๐”ฒ๐”ฑ๐”ฆ๐”ฌ๐”ซ (๐”ธ๐•Ÿ๐•ฅ๐•š ๐”ผ๐•ง๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ฅ๐•š๐• ๐•Ÿ)
@AntiEvolution ยท 381
1 post
๐”„๐”ซ๐”ฑ๐”ฆ ๐”๐”ฒ๐” ๐”ฆ๐”ฃ๐”ข๐”ฏ๐”ฆ๐”ž๐”ซ๐”ฆ๐”ฐ๐”ช - ๐”ธ๐•Ÿ๐•ฅ๐•š ๐”พ๐•Ÿ๐• ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•š๐•ค๐•ž
@AntiLuciferianism ยท 878
1 post
๐”„๐”ซ๐”ฑ๐”ฆ ๐”๐”ž๐”ฐ๐”ฌ๐”ซ๐”ฏ๐”ถ
@AntiMasonry ยท 2,521
1 post
๐”„๐”ซ๐”ฑ๐”ฆ ๐”–๐”ข๐”ฏ๐”ญ๐”ข๐”ซ๐”ฑ ๐”–๐”ข๐”ข๐”ก
@AntiSerpentSeed ยท 188
1 post
๐”๐”ข๐”ฅ๐”ฌ๐”ณ๐”ž๐”ฅ'๐”ฐ ๐”‰๐”ž๐”ฉ๐”ฐ๐”ข ๐”š๐”ฆ๐”ฑ๐”ซ๐”ข๐”ฐ๐”ฐ๐”ข๐”ฐ [๐”ธ๐•Ÿ๐•ฅ๐•š-๐•๐•Ž]
@Anti_JW ยท 460
1 post
๐•น๐–Š๐–œ ๐•ฌ๐–Œ๐–Š๐–™๐–†๐–—๐–‰
@Anti_NewAge ยท 928
1 post
๐”…๐”ฆ๐”Ÿ๐”ฉ๐”ฆ๐” ๐”ž๐”ฉ ๐”ฝ๐”ผ
@BiblicalFE ยท 3,339
1 post
๐”น๐• ๐•ฆ๐•Ÿ๐••๐•ค ๐• ๐•— โ„๐•’๐•“๐•š๐•ฅ๐•’๐•ฅ๐•š๐• ๐•Ÿ
@BoundsofHabitation ยท 308
1 post
๐”๐”ž๐”ฑ๐”ฑ๐”ข๐”ฏ ๐”‡๐”ž๐”ถ ๐”–๐”ž๐”ฑ๐”ž๐”ซ๐”ฐ [๐”ธ๐•Ÿ๐•ฅ๐•š ๐•„๐• ๐•ฃ๐•ž๐• ๐•Ÿ๐•š๐•ค๐•ž]
@BretheransistersthroughChrist ยท 408
1 post
๐•ฌ๐–“๐–™๐–Ž ๐•ฌ๐–’๐–Ž๐–‘๐–‘๐–Š๐–“๐–Ž๐–†๐–‘๐–Ž๐–˜๐–’
@antiamillennialism ยท 157
1 post
๐•ฌ๐–“๐–™๐–Ž ๐•บ๐–‰๐–Ž๐–“๐–Ž๐–˜๐–’
@antiodinism ยท 417
1 post
๐•ฌ๐–“๐–™๐–Ž ๐•ญ๐–”๐–”๐– ๐–”๐–‹ ๐•ฐ๐–“๐–”๐–ˆ๐–
@falsebookofenoch ยท 653
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

๐•ฑ๐–‘๐–†๐–™ ๐•ฐ๐–†๐–—๐–™๐– ๐•พ๐–”๐–ˆ๐–Ž๐–Š๐–™๐–ž
@flatearth ยท 44,740
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 69 here โ€” alongside 68 others โ€” read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐Ÿ“Š Politically Incorrect Pollsโ€ (@incorrectpolls), 1,862 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/incorrectpolls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.