Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐Ÿ“Š Politically Incorrect Polls

@incorrectpolls

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

1,858subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001950600524
TypeChannel
Username@incorrectpolls
Created18 September 2023 โ€” measured โ€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/incorrectpolls

Growth

1,8431,8581,850.56 August 2026 โ€” 1,847 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 1,847 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 1,843 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 1,857 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 1,858 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 1,841โ€“1,860 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:441,858+1
9 Aug 2026, 21:311,857+14
7 Aug 2026, 03:571,843-4
6 Aug 2026, 06:481,847no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:351,847first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
13.9%
avg views รท 1,858 subscribers
Avg views / post
259
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.33%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held21 (30 July 2026 โ€“ 6 August 2026)
Views total5,435
Reactions total197
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 05s
Average length
1m 42s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

191 reactions across 17 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ˜7036.6%
๐Ÿ‘ป2613.6%
๐Ÿคฃ2412.6%
โšก105.24%
๐Ÿ‘Ž84.19%
๐ŸŒš63.14%
๐Ÿ”ฅ63.14%
๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚63.14%
โค52.62%
๐Ÿฅด52.62%
๐Ÿคก42.09%
๐Ÿ‘31.57%
๐Ÿ˜Ž31.57%
๐Ÿคจ31.57%
๐Ÿคฉ31.57%
๐Ÿ—ฟ21.05%
๐Ÿ˜10.524%
๐Ÿ˜จ10.524%
๐Ÿ˜ด10.524%
๐Ÿ™ˆ10.524%
3 further kinds31.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 197reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC117 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @EndinessCompendiumVideo

๐”ˆ๐”ซ๐”ก๐”ฆ๐”ซ๐”ข๐”ฐ๐”ฐ โ„ญ๐”ฌ๐”ช๐”ญ๐”ข๐”ซ๐”ก๐”ฆ๐”ฒ๐”ช

๐Ÿคฃ7๐Ÿคฉ3๐Ÿ˜Ž3๐Ÿ—ฟ2๐Ÿ˜1

5 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC143 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @antiquitecharchivePhoto

OPEN CHALLENGE โ€” What is This Word? What you are seeing is my own handwriting. The person I sent this to couldn't read this specific word. No one else I sent it to could either. So I'm putting it up as an open challenge. If you can read this word and tell me what it is, you will receive admin privs in all of my chats. Yes, this is a real English word. No, this is not an obscure word. No, this is not more than one โ€ฆ

๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚6๐Ÿ˜5๐Ÿฅฑ1

4 Aug 2026, 01:22 UTC234 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

For the low-IQ, this verse means 20%

๐Ÿ˜23๐Ÿคฃ4๐Ÿคฏ1

4 Aug 2026, 01:19 UTC261 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Do you pay more or less taxes than Egyptian slaves?

  1. I pay more taxes than Egyptian slaves80%
  2. I pay less taxes than Egyptian slaves20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

โšก7

3 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC198 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @AntiDispensationalismVideo

๐”„๐”ซ๐”ฑ๐”ฆ ๐”‡๐”ฆ๐”ฐ๐”ญ๐”ข๐”ซ๐”ฐ๐”ž๐”ฑ๐”ฆ๐”ฌ๐”ซ๐”ž๐”ฉ๐”ฆ๐”ฐ๐”ช

๐Ÿ˜13โค3

3 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC208 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

๐•‚๐•๐• โ„๐•’๐••๐•š๐• 

๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘1

2 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTC259 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Would you have fellowship with Catholics?

  1. Yes, as long as they're white. Doesn't matter if they hate whites3%
  2. Yes, as long as they're white but they'll have to be prowhite73%
  3. No, why should I have fellowship with an enemy25%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

๐Ÿ‘1

2 Aug 2026, 02:07 UTC292 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Are you:

  1. Baptist/IFB13%
  2. Catholic / Protestant34%
  3. Judaizer &/or Zionist6%
  4. Other47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

๐Ÿคจ3

1 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC294 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Is this video real?

  1. Yes. Roblox's staff must be provided more photos of children in order to fix this issue19%
  2. No. The video is clearly fake and is an excuse to collect more photos of children for "verification"81%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC274 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Are you oppressed more by the:

  1. Bottom 1%33%
  2. Top 1%67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

๐Ÿคฃ7

31 Jul 2026, 21:06 UTC254 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @AntiPreterismPhoto

๐•ป๐–—๐–Š๐–™๐–†๐–—๐–‰๐–Ž๐–˜๐–’ใ€˜ ๐”ธ๐•Ÿ๐•ฅ๐•š โ„™๐•ฃ๐•–๐•ฅ๐•–๐•ฃ๐•š๐•ค๐•ž ใ€™

๐Ÿ˜17

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @incorrectpolls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 01:19 UTCAnonymous Poll129 voters

Do you pay more or less taxes than Egyptian slaves?

  1. I pay more taxes than Egyptian slaves80%
  2. I pay less taxes than Egyptian slaves20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTCAnonymous Poll110 voters

Would you have fellowship with Catholics?

  1. Yes, as long as they're white. Doesn't matter if they hate whites3%
  2. Yes, as long as they're white but they'll have to be prowhite73%
  3. No, why should I have fellowship with an enemy25%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Aug 2026, 02:07 UTCAnonymous Poll142 voters

Are you:

  1. Baptist/IFB13%
  2. Catholic / Protestant34%
  3. Judaizer &/or Zionist6%
  4. Other47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTCAnonymous Poll73 voters

Is this video real?

  1. Yes. Roblox's staff must be provided more photos of children in order to fix this issue19%
  2. No. The video is clearly fake and is an excuse to collect more photos of children for "verification"81%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTCAnonymous Poll135 voters

Are you oppressed more by the:

  1. Bottom 1%33%
  2. Top 1%67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTCAnonymous Poll73 voters

Is this real

  1. Yes15%
  2. No85%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 69,843 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

๐”—๐”ฅ๐”ข ๐”‰๐”ฌ๐”ฏ๐”Ÿ๐”ฆ๐”ก๐”ก๐”ข๐”ซ ๐”‰๐”ฏ๐”ฒ๐”ฆ๐”ฑ
@BiblicalTeetotalism ยท 28
2 posts
โ„ญ๐”ณ๐” ๐”จ๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ฌ๐”ฉ๐”ฆ๐” ๐”ฆ๐”ฐ๐”ช
@Cvcktholicism ยท 950
2 posts
๐•ฟ๐–๐–Š ๐•ฎ๐–”๐–“๐–‹๐–š๐–˜๐–Ž๐–”๐–“ ๐–”๐–‹ ๐–™๐–๐–Š ๐•ฑ๐–†๐–ˆ๐–Š๐–˜
@TheConfusionoftheFaces ยท 234
2 posts
๐”๐”ข๐”ฅ๐”ฌ๐”ณ๐”ž๐”ฅ'๐”ฐ ๐”‰๐”ž๐”ฉ๐”ฐ๐”ข ๐”š๐”ฆ๐”ฑ๐”ซ๐”ข๐”ฐ๐”ฐ๐”ข๐”ฐ [๐”ธ๐•Ÿ๐•ฅ๐•š-๐•๐•Ž]
@Anti_JW ยท 461
1 post
๐•น๐–Š๐–œ ๐•ฌ๐–Œ๐–Š๐–™๐–†๐–—๐–‰
@Anti_NewAge ยท 929
1 post
๐•ฌ๐–“๐–™๐–Ž ๐•ฌ๐–’๐–Ž๐–‘๐–‘๐–Š๐–“๐–Ž๐–†๐–‘๐–Ž๐–˜๐–’
@antiamillennialism ยท 159
1 post
๐”„๐”ซ๐”ฑ๐”ฆ ๐”…๐”ฒ๐”ก๐”ก๐”ฅ๐”ฆ๐”ฐ๐”ช
@AntiBuddhism ยท 555
1 post
๐”„๐”ซ๐”ฑ๐”ฆ ๐”ˆ๐”ณ๐”ฌ๐”ฉ๐”ฒ๐”ฑ๐”ฆ๐”ฌ๐”ซ (๐”ธ๐•Ÿ๐•ฅ๐•š ๐”ผ๐•ง๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ฅ๐•š๐• ๐•Ÿ)
@AntiEvolution ยท 380
1 post
๐”„๐”ซ๐”ฑ๐”ฆ ๐”๐”ฒ๐” ๐”ฆ๐”ฃ๐”ข๐”ฏ๐”ฆ๐”ž๐”ซ๐”ฆ๐”ฐ๐”ช - ๐”ธ๐•Ÿ๐•ฅ๐•š ๐”พ๐•Ÿ๐• ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•š๐•ค๐•ž
@AntiLuciferianism ยท 867
1 post
๐”„๐”ซ๐”ฑ๐”ฆ ๐”๐”ž๐”ฐ๐”ฌ๐”ซ๐”ฏ๐”ถ
@AntiMasonry ยท 2,500
1 post
๐•ฌ๐–“๐–™๐–Ž ๐•บ๐–‰๐–Ž๐–“๐–Ž๐–˜๐–’
@antiodinism ยท 423
1 post
๐”„๐”ซ๐”ฑ๐”ฆ ๐”–๐”ข๐”ฏ๐”ญ๐”ข๐”ซ๐”ฑ ๐”–๐”ข๐”ข๐”ก
@AntiSerpentSeed ยท 191
1 post
๐”…๐”ฆ๐”Ÿ๐”ฉ๐”ฆ๐” ๐”ž๐”ฉ ๐”ฝ๐”ผ
@BiblicalFE ยท 3,369
1 post
๐”น๐• ๐•ฆ๐•Ÿ๐••๐•ค ๐• ๐•— โ„๐•’๐•“๐•š๐•ฅ๐•’๐•ฅ๐•š๐• ๐•Ÿ
@BoundsofHabitation ยท 312
1 post
๐”๐”ž๐”ฑ๐”ฑ๐”ข๐”ฏ ๐”‡๐”ž๐”ถ ๐”–๐”ž๐”ฑ๐”ž๐”ซ๐”ฐ [๐”ธ๐•Ÿ๐•ฅ๐•š ๐•„๐• ๐•ฃ๐•ž๐• ๐•Ÿ๐•š๐•ค๐•ž]
@BretheransistersthroughChrist ยท 403
1 post
๐•ฌ๐–“๐–™๐–Ž ๐•ญ๐–”๐–”๐– ๐–”๐–‹ ๐•ฐ๐–“๐–”๐–ˆ๐–
@falsebookofenoch ยท 658
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐Ÿ“Š Politically Incorrect Pollsโ€ (@incorrectpolls), 1,858 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/incorrectpolls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.