Channel
@An_Nahdaru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
1,160subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002226755309 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @An_Nahdaru |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/An_Nahdaru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 1,160 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 1,162 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 1,162 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (8 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,922 |
| Reactions total | 61 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
152 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 85 | 55.9% | |
| 👍 | 58 | 38.2% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 5.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❓Присоединился бы Шейхуль-Ислям Ибн Теймийя (да помилует его Аллах) к сирийской революции и войне ХАМАС с Израилем в Газе? | Отвечает специалист по наследию Ибн Теймийи Раид ас-Самхури В этом фрагменте Раид ас-Самхури — исследователь наследия Шейхуль-Исляма Ибн Теймийи — отвечает на вопрос: какую позицию занял бы Ибн Теймийя в отношении сирийской революции и войны в Газе? Полную версию разбора смотрите на YouTube. …
❤4
Таким образом обстояли дела в домодерновую эпоху. Во многом подобный подход способствовал сохранению классического суннитского учения и ограничивал публичное распространение еретических течений. Сегодня же ситуация кардинально изменилась. В результате европейской колониальной экспансии значительная часть исламского мира утратила свои традиционные политико-правовые институты, а шариатские судебные системы во многих с…
❤10
Какова была участь еретиков в исламском мире домодерновой эпохи? Сегодня, когда мы видим различных сектантов, еретиков и людей, открыто насмехающихся над религией Аллаха и поносящих ученых, многие задаются вопросом: какова была их участь в исламских государствах домодерновой эпохи, то есть до 19-20 веков? Прежде всего необходимо понимать, что исламское право не рассматривало всех заблудших как одну категорию. Факи…
❤8
Photo, posted without a caption
Деколонизация начинается с языка Ниже передаю по смыслу интересную мысль катарского исследователя, доктора Наифа бин Нахара. Она посвящена тому, как колониальное прошлое продолжает влиять не только на политические институты мусульманских стран, но и на язык, термины и само восприятие исламского мира. «Светский характер большинства конституций современных мусульманских государств является не внутренним продуктом исл…
❤14👍4
Роль сеййидов и суфийских сетей в исламизации Орды Роль сеййидов и суфийских сетей в исламизации Орды Когда говорят об исламизации Золотой Орды, внимание чаще всего достается ханам. Это понятно: решения правителей хорошо видны в летописях, монетах, дипломатии. Однако этот процесс не сводился только к решениям ханов. В исламском мире особым уважением пользовались сеййиды — люди, чье происхождение связывали с родом …
❤9👍3
📚 Шафиитский мазхаб… место встречи различных школ фикха. Шафиитский мазхаб не сформировался в какой-то одной фикховой среде. Напротив, имам аш-Шафии собрал в себе лучшие плоды научных школ своего времени. 👈 Он перенял фикх жителей Медины от имама Малика, получил знания о фикхе жителей Мекки от Суфьяна ибн ‘Уяйны, а также ознакомился с фикхом жителей Ирака через Мухаммада ибн аль-Хасана аш-Шейбани. • Таким образом,…
❤7👍2
К концу XVIII века царизм притеснял народы Кавказа, вел жестокую политику покорения горцев, а любое проявление сопротивления беспощадно подавлял. У горцев не было сильного лидера, способного объединить их и оказать достойное сопротивление притеснителям, пока над аулом Алды не взошла звезда надежды. В 1760 году в плоскостной Чечне, в бедной крестьянской семье, родился мальчик, нареченный именем Ушурма, будущий шейх М…
❤10👍2
Шейх Мансур | #ВеликиеИменаКавказа «Одним из страстных и настойчивых стремлений шейха Мансура было соединить в одно все горские народы». Н. Берзедж
👍8❤3
🇪🇺🇫🇷 Европейский гуманизм Франция в своем отношении к мусульманам, имеющим французское гражданство, заявляет что религии не место в школах, хиджаб запрещен, и так далее… Всё это — якобы ради сохранения национальной идентичности (L’identité nationale), которая стала идолом секуляризма. Ведь религия, по их утверждению, — исключительно личное дело, поэтому государство должно максимально ограничивать её присутствие и н…
❤18👍4
Книги, которые я собираюсь прочитать этим летом, если будет на то воля Аллаха. 1. «Великие имена Кавказа» — книга, в которой собраны имена выдающихся героев Кавказа. Очень интересная работа, написанная в стиле книги Джихада ат-Турбани «100 великих людей Ислама». 2. «Арабы» Юджина Рогана — тоже очень интересная книга и, на мой взгляд, одна из лучших в моей коллекции. 3. «Сира аль-Малики аль-‘Адил Нур ад-Дин Занги» …
👍17
Относительно Ибрагима Мусы Иногда смотришь на некоторые ”идейные эволюции“ и невольно задаёшься вопросом, это действительно результат долгих размышлений или сценарий переписали где-то между первой и второй серией? Человек, который, кажется, ещё до своего полового созревания был ярым арабским социал-националистом и был готов воевать со всеми врагами арабов сразу, внезапно приходит к выводу, что арабам, оказывается, …
😁9👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @An_Nahdaru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 265,487 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“An Nahda | Возрождение” (@An_Nahdaru), 1,160 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/An_Nahdaru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.