Channel
@e_intifada
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,044subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001463762929 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @e_intifada |
| Created | 17 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/e_intifada |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 2,044 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 2,049 | -4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:36 | 2,053 | +2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 2,051 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 2,061 | +35 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 2,026 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 2,032 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 2,035 | -9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 2,044 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 2,047 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:20 | 2,043 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 2,043 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 29 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
155 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 33.5% | |
| 🤬 | 48 | 31.0% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 25.2% | |
| ⚡ | 10 | 6.45% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.94% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.645% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.645% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.645% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 507 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇹🇷🇸🇦🇵🇰 Сегодня Турция, Саудовская Аравия и Пакистан подписали в Мекке трёхстороннее «Мекканское соглашение о совместной обороне» – в церемонии подписания документа участвовали наследный принц Саудовской Аравии Мухаммед бен Салман, президент Турции Тайип Эрдоган и премьер-министр Пакистана Шахбаз Шариф. Характерно, что подписание состоялось в священном исламском городе, что придаёт пакту дополнительный символический в…
❤3👍2💔1
#джума Братья и сестры. Напоминаю, что вы можете поддержать данный канал, если считаете его полезным для мусульман. Вашу помощь можете отправлять на карту Каспи по номеру: 8 705 700 99 75 (Бекзат). БарокАллаху фикум! — админ
❤7❤🔥3👍3🤝1
По имеющимся данным, Алагузов также владеет компанией «JFood Kazakhstan», производящей известную в Казахстане муку «Цесна». Доказательство: https://kz.kursiv.media/2025-03-14/zhzh-alaguzovjfood/ https://t.me/intifada_obyvatelskoi_mysli
👍7❤2⚡1🔥1
Супруг неутомимой исламофобки Баян – Турсенгали Алагузов – в 2024 году стал новым пивным королем Казахстана, когда купил ТОО «Шымкентский пивоваренный завод» за 8 млрд. тенге.(~16 млн. долл. США). По данным открытых источников, это ведущий производитель пива на юге Казахстана с мощностью 20 млн. декалитров в год (~270 тыс. бутылок пива объемом 0,7 л.). https://t.me/intifada_OM
👍6🤬5❤1
Братья и сестры, призываем вас объявить бойкот бренду «GALANZ bottlers» (производитель популярного напитка «Maxi Чай»), который принадлежит мужу исламофобки Баян Алагузовой — Турсынгали Алагузову. Причина — давняя враждебность Алагузовой к мусульманам и, в частности, недавние призывы к казахам отказаться от ислама в пользу так называемого тенгрианства, а также ее открытые религиозно мотивированные нападки на некотор…
👍12❤5⚡1
Это все к тому, чтобы мусульмане перестали быть наивными, обманываясь внешним благородством целей и красивой картинкой, за которыми скрываются вот такие проекты и лидеры общественного мнения. Они надели на себя одеяние из невежества относительно ислама, маски поборников правды и оживителей благородства нашего народа, тогда как совершенно того не заслуживают. Не в этом их состоянии. Просим у Аллаха вести нас прямым п…
❤22⚡1
А это тенгрианец и исламофоб Диас Камеридан (~180К подписчиков в Инстаграм и Телеграм), более известный как Unknownkazak, который распространяет байки о принятии казахами ислама лишь при царской России, а также не скрывает непрязни к имени Мухаммад, о чем я подробно писал тут. Базовый пакет убеждений постсовкового либерала-националиста прилагается. https://t.me/e_intifada
🤬15⚡2
Посмотрите на это: учитывая идеологический фон данного проекта, как и явно неприязненное отношение его основателя к исламу и мусульманам, в этом твите Н. Багидолла, вероятнее всего, клевещет на нашего господина — пророка Мухаммада, да благословит его Аллах и приветствует. https://t.me/e_intifada
🤬16⚡2👍1
Немного о проекте по популяризации казахского языка Qazaqgrammar (100К подписчиков в Инстаграм) и его основателе Нурсултане Багидолла. https://t.me/e_intifada
🤬12⚡3👍1
Мы живем в дни, когда мусульманин должен знать об идеологической подоплеке внешне не связанных с антирелигиозной повесткой инициатив и проектов, на которые хочет подписаться или участвовать в них. Это касается чего угодно, например, фактчекинговых ресурсов, языковых и издательских проектов. Особенно подобное можно сказать о правозащитной тематике. Опыт показывает, что сегодня многие проекты, располагающие собственным…
❤12👍7
https://youtu.be/CjjqGj9Wx3M?si=fwRiHCol_ePYPP3s
В связи с текущими жизненными обстоятельствами, сестра Асель и ее дети вынуждены были искать новое место проживания. По милости Аллаха им предоставили бесплатно вот такой частный дом. Теперь сестре необходимо осуществить переезд с использованием услуг платных перевозчиков, а также, как вы понимаете, постараться обустроить новое жилище, отремонтировать кое-какие неисправности и так далее. https://t.me/intifada_OM
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @e_intifada. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@e_intifada named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Электронная интифада” (@e_intifada), 2,044 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/e_intifada.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.