Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Владимир Назаров - агентство и бизнес

@headpromo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,966subscribers

-43 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001421746087
TypeChannel
Username@headpromo
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/headpromo

Growth

7,9668,0097,987.56 August 2026 — 8,009 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,009 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,972 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,966 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,960–8,015 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:287,966-6
10 Aug 2026, 02:117,972-37
6 Aug 2026, 03:048,009no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:208,009first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.14%
avg views ÷ 7,966 subscribers
Avg views / post
409
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held18 (19 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total3,275
Reactions total111
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

243 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8635.4%
7129.2%
👍7129.2%
😁41.65%
🫡41.65%
👏31.23%
👎20.823%
🗿10.412%
🙏10.412%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 18 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @headpromo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC203 views14 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Август Стараюсь больше отдыхать, меньше активности, выступлений, новых рабочих задач. Из интересного, пилю автоматизацию по GEO в два этапа: 1. Должен автоматизировать часть текущих процессов, но вовлеченность человека сохраняется. Это для крупных проектов, где важен персональный подход, но рутину можно отдать ИИ с последующей проверкой спецами. 2. На 90% автоматизированный процесс. Тут вовлеченность сотрудника н

7🔥5👍2

4 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC375 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как из чеков в 7 500 рублей перейти к чекам в 200 000, вырастить агентство и не растерять клиентов по дороге Вышел подкаст Антона Маркина, куда он пригласил меня в качестве гостя. Поговорили не только про SEO и GEO, но и про внутреннюю кухню агентства: — с чего я начинал и где находил первых клиентов; — почему мы когда-то работали за 7500 рублей; — как поднимали средний чек; — какие каналы привлечения клиентов реал

🔥87👍4😁1

4 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC324 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ссылочное продвижение под Google с реальными результатами от Интернет Партнер💥 Нужны ссылки, которые действительно двигают сайт в ТОП? 🚀 Используем рабочие связки 2026 года и системно усиливаем проекты даже в высококонкурентных нишах. ЧТО МЫ ПРЕДЛАГАЕМ 📈 Многоуровневые редиректы Усиливаем ссылочный вес и ускоряем рост позиций. 📈 PBN-сети Размещаем мощные ссылки с тематических доменов. 📈 Tier 2 и Tier 3 Дополните

5👍3🔥2

29 Jul 2026, 14:18 UTC429 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Алиса AI уже отвечает на 42% поисковых запросов в Яндексе Яндекс опубликовал отчёт за второй квартал 2026 года. Одна из самых интересных для рынка GEO цифр находится не в финансовой части. Доля запросов, на которые Алиса AI формирует ответ непосредственно в Поиске, достигла 42%. Только за один квартал показатель вырос сразу на 7 процентных пунктов. Ежемесячно с ответами Алисы AI под поисковой строкой взаимодейству

9👍2🔥2

28 Jul 2026, 06:59 UTC425 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ситуация с WB. Жалко селлеров, у меня несколько знакомых попали на десятки миллионов. Хорошо если что-то возместят, но точно даже не близко к сумме потерь. Если склады продолжат гореть, то даже не знаю, как селлерам все это вывозить. В этом году бизнесу в целом непросто. С другой стороны, вспоминаешь, как хорошо было все эти годы, а мы не ценили :) Но фигня, прорвемся, куда деваться.

👍65🫡4

27 Jul 2026, 05:58 UTC400 views8 reactions7 Starsread 12 August 2026

Часто стала попадаться инфа о насаждении использования ИИ в компаниях "сверху". Мол сотрудники сами не хотят, надо заставлять директивно. А как у вас в компании с этим обстоят дела? Поделитесь, если вы предприниматель или сотрудник, интересно. У нас я бы оценил на 3,5 из 10, кажется, что можно использовать сильно больше и лучше, чем сейчас.

4👍2🔥2

21 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC572 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вернулся к работе. Прекрасно отдохнул, набрался сил и идей. Надо почаще в отпуск выбираться. Отдел продаж закрыл две сделки, пока я отдыхал, это обрадовало больше всего. Продажи, это то, что волнует любой бизнес, особенно агентства. А уж продажи на крупные чеки без участия фаундера — это мечта, можно сказать. А еще мы взяли (еще одного) редактора. Помните писал про 500+ откликов за сутки? Было непросто, но за две

🔥143👍1

16 Jul 2026, 04:48 UTC547 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Привет, друзья! Вышел подкаст, где мы с Димой Севальневым обсуждаем GEO, немного SEO, рынок, специфику услуги и еще много чего. Welcome! YouTube: https://youtu.be/9gAG6XR704E?si=QHQPYEpvh8pfe7t6 ВКонтакте: https://vkvideo.ru/video-141990443_456239707?t=1s RuTube: https://rutube.ru/plst/1376300?r=wd

🔥7👍41👏1

11 Jul 2026, 11:09 UTC619 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Уехал в отпуск. Раньше стабильно летали 2-3 раза в год, бывало и на месяц и на три. А в последнее время ушел в работу с головой. В итоге 1,5 года вообще не был в отпуске. Да и сейчас, не совсем классический отпуск — друг женится и позвал на мальчишник в Тай на неделю. Арендовали виллу и улетели 9 человек из России и еще 2 китайца, чисто мужской компанией. Вернусь через неделю, а пока отдых выкручиваем на максимум.

🔥14👍54👏1

8 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC544 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Оплачиваете тестовые задания?

  1. Да, любое тестовое16%
  2. Да, но только объемное46%
  3. Нет38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Jul 2026, 08:54 UTC559 views12 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

500+ откликов за сутки Мы открыли вакансию на второго редактора. Думал спокойно посмотрим отклики. А пришлось придумывать как сужать воронку, потому что такое количество резюме чисто физически отсмотреть тяжело, с учётом того, что их количество стремительно растет. Быстро разработали анкету и авторассылкой на все отклики просим её заполнить. Тут две цели: 1. Мы сразу запрашиваем нужную нам информацию о каждому кан

👍52👎2🔥1🗿1😁1

7 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC439 views12 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Как у вас первое полугодие? Посмотрел по выручке, годовой план пока закрыли на 35%. В целом неплохо, так как план у нас довольно амбициозный, в текущих реалиях. Второе полугодие, исторически, у нас лучше чем первое, так что шансы есть. Из ярких изменений именно этого года: большая волатильность по клиентам. Стабильности стало сильно меньше. Но в таких уж условиях живем. Плюс, связываю это с тем, что у нас стало мн

👍72🔥2😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @headpromo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTCAnonymous Poll63 voters

Оплачиваете тестовые задания?

  1. Да, любое тестовое16%
  2. Да, но только объемное46%
  3. Нет38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 11,537 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Владимир Назаров - агентство и бизнес” (@headpromo), 7,966 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/headpromo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.