Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

صَفِيُّ الدِّينِ الحَيدَرِي

@Al_alanwar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,035subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002009955841
TypeChannel
Username@Al_alanwar
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Al_alanwar

Growth

1,0301,0351,032.56 August 2026 — 1,030 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,032 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,035 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,029–1,036 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 10:121,035+3
7 Aug 2026, 14:051,032+2
6 Aug 2026, 18:331,030first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.1%
avg views ÷ 1,035 subscribers
Avg views / post
167
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (26 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,997
Reactions total41
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3892.7%
🔥37.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTCviews —

صَفِيُّ الدِّينِ الحَيدَرِي pinned «"وأمّا اتّباعُ العقلِ الصِّرف، فلا يَقوى عليه إلّا أولياءُ اللهِ تعالى، الّذينَ أراهم اللهُ الحقَّ حقًّا، وقوّاهم على اتّباعِه. وإنْ أردتّ أن تجرِّب هذا في الاعتقادات، فأورِد على فَهم العامّيّ المعتزليّ مسألةً معقولة جليّة، فيسارع إلى قَبولها، فلو قلتَ له:…»

6 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC60 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AMQOTB

"وأمّا اتّباعُ العقلِ الصِّرف، فلا يَقوى عليه إلّا أولياءُ اللهِ تعالى، الّذينَ أراهم اللهُ الحقَّ حقًّا، وقوّاهم على اتّباعِه. وإنْ أردتّ أن تجرِّب هذا في الاعتقادات، فأورِد على فَهم العامّيّ المعتزليّ مسألةً معقولة جليّة، فيسارع إلى قَبولها، فلو قلتَ له: إنّه مذهبُ الأشعريّ رضي الله عنه، لنفَر وامتنعَ عن القَبول، وانقلَب مكذِّبًا بعينِ ما صَدّق به، مهما كان سيِّئَ الظنّ بالأشعريّ؛ إذ كان قُبح ذلك في نفسه منذ الصِّ

3

5 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC89 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

في الحديث الشريف عند سؤال سيدنا جبريل عن الساعة: (ما المسؤول عنها بأعلم من السائل). قال ملا علي القاري: "أي: كل مسؤول عنها عاجز عن جوابه، كالسائل عنها؛ فإنه سبحانه استأثر بعلمها فلا يعلمها إلا هو". ـ شرح مسند الإمام الأعظم.

2

4 Aug 2026, 21:22 UTC115 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

فإن جودة العلم لا تتكوَّن إلا بجودة النقد، ولولا النقدُ لبطل كثيرُ علمٍ، ولاختلط الجهل بالعلم اختلاطًا لا خلاص منه ولا حيلة فيه. ـ محمود شاكر.

4

3 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC131 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

أقيم اليوم حفل لتكريم د. مازن المبارك وندوة عنه، والحقيقة: أن الندوة كانت مفيدة في الإضاءة على أخلاقه ومنهج تعامله مع طلابه وأساتذته وأقرانه. رحمه الله تعالى.

2 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC143 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @abulmunthirFile

File, posted without a caption

1

2 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC114 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @abulmunthir

قعدتُ أمسِ مع صديقٍ لي قديم مشتغل بالهندسة الميكانيكية في بلاد الألمان قد أُجيز من إحدى جامعاتهم قريبًا بمرتبة الماجستر مع اجتهاد منه وحُسن نظرٍ وطول مكابدة لفنّه، وهو مُجمِعٌ إن شاء الله على إتمام درجة العالِميّة هناك وفّقه الله وسدّده. فأخذني على عادته بالحديث يَمنةً ويَسرةً حتى فترت، وأنا امرؤٌ لم يُحبَّب إليّ الكلام إلا فيما أشتهي، وشديدٌ على نفسي أن أستمع إلى ما لا تنزع نفسي إلى معرفته. فلم يَزَل بي حتى وجدت منه

2 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC132 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @abulmunthir

هذا مع أن في المتن بركةً وفائدةً ليست في غيره، إذ هو يجمع لك أشتات المسائل في الفن ويضعها أمام عينك، ثم تزيد عليه أنت من أطراف العلوم ما يكون قِوام الملكة في نفسك. وأما التعلم من غير عُمدة ومدارٍ فإنه أخلق بتحصيل أشتاتٍ متفرقة من المعلومات من غير علم وملكة مُرَّتبة يَعرف بها الطالب نسبة كل مسألة إلى أختها، ودليلها على جهة التفصيل، ويُحسن إنتاج العلم كما يُحسن شرحه. ولعلكّ إنّما رابك بعض طرق الجهلة من المتصدّرين للتدر

1

2 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC123 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

(وقال محمد بن المظفر الحافظ: سمعت مشايخنا بمصر يصفون اجتهاد النَّسائي في العبادة بالليل والنهار، وأنه خرج إلى الفداء مع أمير مصر فوصف من شهامته وإقامته السنن المأثورة في فداء المسلمين، واحترازه عن مجالس السلطان الذي خرج معه والانبساطِ في المأكل، وأنه لم يزل ذلك دأبه إلى أن استشهد بدمشق من جهة الخوارج. وقال الدارقطني: كان ابن الحداد أبو بكر كثير الحديث، ولم يحدث عن غير النَّسائي، وقال: رضيت به حجة فيما بيني وبين الل

2

2 Aug 2026, 02:39 UTC161 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

وقد ذكر الإمام النسفي صاحب المنظومة بإسناده إلى محمد بن سلمة قال: خرجت إلى البصرة في طلب الحديث، فأخرج شيخ مسند الإمام [أبي حنيفة] وأملى، فامتنع بعضهم عن الكتابة، فأمسك الشيخ أيامًا عن الحديث، ثم قال: أدركت مجلسه وكان يحضره فلان وفلان، وهؤلاء لا يكتبون حديثه؟! فتشفعنا إليه بالله تعالى حتى حدثنا بأحاديث. ـ شرح مسند الإمام, لمُلَّا علي القاري. ما بين قوسين من إضافتي.

3

1 Aug 2026, 23:07 UTC226 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

(قال أبو نصر ابن ماكولا: رأيت في المنام كأني أسأل عن حال الدارقطني في الآخرة، فقيل لي: ذلك يدعى في الجنة الإمام!). ـ طبقات الشافعية الكبرى.

5

1 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC165 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ذكر الإمام الكاساني في شرائط وجوب حدِّ الشرب (الإسلام) وقال: وشرب الخمر مباح لأهل الذمة عند أكثر مشايخنا، فلا يكون جنايةً، وعند بعضهم وإن كان حرامًا لكنا نهينا عن التعرض لهم وما يدينون، وفي إقامة الحدِّ عليهم تعرض لهم من حيث المعنى؛ لأنها تمنعهم من الشرب. وعن الحسن بن زياد رحمه الله: أنهم إذا شربوا وسكروا يحدُّون لأجل السُكر لا لأجل الشرب؛ لأن السكر حرام في الأديان كلها، وما قاله الحسن حسن. ـ بدائع الصنائع.

5

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Al_alanwar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 377,670 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“صَفِيُّ الدِّينِ الحَيدَرِي” (@Al_alanwar), 1,035 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Al_alanwar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.