Prompt share: Ground-Level Fashion Hero 💬 Prompt: A [subject] photographed from an extreme low-angle ground-level view, camera positioned near the floor and tilted upward, standing alone in an off-white studio void, confident pose, dominant elongated silhouette, stylised proportions, sleek fashion styling, reflective textures, bold accessories, soft studio light, single beauty-dish flash casting crisp shadows, subtl…

Channel
Ai Orbit Insights • Neural Media & AI News
@AiOrbitInsights
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
53,664subscribers
-1,688 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001834303412 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AiOrbitInsights |
| Description | Independent AI news. Not affiliated with or endorsed by OpenAI, Meta, or Google. All trademarks belong to their respective owners. Info purposes only. Support — @AISupportroBot |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AiOrbitInsights |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
@AiOrbitInsights was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
held 7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 53,664 | no change |
| 25 Sept 2026, 20:47 | 53,664 | -2,578 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 56,242 | +148 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 56,094 | +48 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 56,046 | +93 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 55,953 | +147 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 55,806 | -33 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 55,839 | +114 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:42 | 55,725 | +50 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:44 | 55,675 | +31 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 55,644 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 55,639 | +46 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 55,593 | +19 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 55,574 | +10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 55,564 | +7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 55,557 | +48 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 55,509 | -49 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 55,558 | +14 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 55,544 | -48 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 55,592 | first reading |
Engagement
127 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 84 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.65%
- avg views ÷ 53,664 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,420
- 55 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.124%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 55
- of 127 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 55 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 127 (2 August 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 78,249 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,720
- Videos
- ≈1,820
- Links
- ≈1,580
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 50m 39s
- Average length
- 44s
Measured directly from 69 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
113 reactions across 54 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 76 | 67.3% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 7.08% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 6.19% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 6.19% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 3.54% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.77% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 1.77% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 1.77% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 1.77% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 0.885% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.885% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.885% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 127 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Prompt share: Seventies Quiet Cinema 💬 Prompt: Cinematic portrait of a [subject] against a [background], soft ambient light, warm earthy palette, understated 1970s wardrobe, natural relaxed pose, introspective expression, subtle film grain, shallow depth of field, muted contrast, nostalgic editorial photography, intimate cinematic mood Generated on TrueVideo.AI ❤️ @AiOrbitInsights | 🤖ChatGptBot | 🤖 Our Bots
❤2
Zuckerberg announces Meta's first pair of VR glasses with an AI agent embedded into the OS: "It is a glimpse of the future." ❤️ @AiOrbitInsights | 🤖ChatGptBot | 🤖 Our Bots
👌1👍1🤔1
Smart Rail Robot Uses AI to Automate Track Maintenance ❤️ @AiOrbitInsights | 🤖ChatGptBot | 🤖 Our Bots
❤1
Prompt share: Digital Fracture 💬 Prompt: A glitch art-inspired [subject], fragmented by digital overlays, pixel displacement, scanline interference, data corruption, and broken visual layers, neon [color1] and [color2] accents cutting through the form, controlled digital chaos, sharp contrast, futuristic atmosphere, surreal cyber energy, crisp distortion details, isolated on a clean white background Generated on T…
The Machine That Builds the World's Most Advanced Computer Chips ❤️ @AiOrbitInsights | 🤖ChatGptBot | 🤖 Our Bots
5 Innovative Trash Can Designs That Rethink Waste Management ❤️ @AiOrbitInsights | 🤖ChatGptBot | 🤖 Our Bots
Prompt share: Neon OVA Nostalgia 💬 Prompt: 1990s Japanese anime OVA illustration of a [subject] [action] in a [setting], soft city neon reflections, muted blue and pink palette, retro cel shading, crisp hand-drawn linework, subtle film grain, expressive character design, cinematic composition, nostalgic urban atmosphere, vintage CD jacket aesthetic Generated on TrueVideo.AI ❤️ @AiOrbitInsights | 🤖ChatGptBot | 🤖 …
Prompt share: Monochrome High-Key Elegance 💬 Prompt: Fine-art black and white photograph of a [subject], clean white background, high-key studio lighting, minimalist composition, elegant silhouette, subtle natural details, deep blacks and luminous whites, strong tonal contrast, refined editorial photography aesthetic, timeless mood, sharp focus Generated on TrueVideo.AI ❤️ @chatgpt5 | 🤖ChatGptBot | 🤖 Our Bots
Former VP Kamala Harris calls for slowing frontier AI development, urges Congress to establish a federal oversight and testing agency and says the president should pursue a treaty with China and other countries to limit dangerous uses of AI. ➡️ @RealTimeDailyNews
❤1
Next-Gen Smart Helmet Packs Advanced Safety Tech Inside ❤️ @chatgpt5 | 🤖ChatGptBot | 🤖 Our Bots
😱1
Synthesys X — an AI extension that generates visual alternatives to any image right in your browser. The core idea is simple: easily recreate any artwork or stock photo you like without watermarks or copyright violations. • Works directly in your browser without requiring complex prompts. • Analyzes the structure and style of the original image to generate brand-new, royalty-free variations. • Perfect for finding h…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 127 posts we hold for @AiOrbitInsights. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@AiOrbitInsights edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 1 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@AiMotionNews · 29,581#1
@OpenAi_ChatGPT · 3,150#2
@gpt_chatru · 19,475#3
@Chatgpt_googlebard · 6,742#4
@aipost · 700,241#5
@technotricksters · 48,231#6
@theai · 22,934#7
@gpt_anthropic · 25,043#8
@ChatGPTMastermind · 8,002#9
@hiaimediaen · 564,679#10
@perplexity · 1,443,494#11
@aimastery101 · 5,529#12
@AI_Best_Tools · 58,470#13
@meet_chatgpt · 18,419#14
@ChatGPT_by_OpenAI · 36,525#15
@gptfresh · 3,794#16
@aiindi · 58,779#17
@aineeringdotcom · 16,029#18
@dreamgf_ai · 1,069#19
@refacee · 5,537#20
@my_technology_prime · 4,193#21
@Swaperface_1 · 24,884#22
@Best_AI_tools · 170,248#23
@nematiai · 1,483#24
@chatgpt_prom · 5,434#25
@brainstorm_ai · 3,974#26
@deeplearning005 · 11,155#27
@softwareninja · 13,146#28
@machinelearning_deeplearning · 55,794#29
@DragGANai · 6,536#30
@Curiousprogrammer · 42,238#31
@ai_odyssey_art · 14,882#32
@MidJourneyAI1 · 33,710#33
@AI_artz · 9,749#34
@FOREXGoldXAUBookie · 6,476#35
@TheTomorrowTechnology · 9,417#36
@images024 · 56,123#37
@deep_fake_bot_news · 22,954#38
@datasciencefree · 68,434#39
@ai_art_beauty_image_midjourney · 8,632#40
@dsabooks · 59,150#41
@neirodrive · 19,705#42
@AIArtsGallery · 6,817#43
@vidslw · 8,578#44
@midjourney_dark · 3,381#45
@midjourney6 · 9,170#46
@fashion_style_ai · 1,210#47
@midjourney_ru · 5,660#48
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@CryptoTrade_land · 26,864
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ai Orbit Insights • Neural Media & AI News” (@AiOrbitInsights), 53,664 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AiOrbitInsights.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.