Channel
@Chatgpt_googlebard
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,489subscribers
+19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001671946040 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Chatgpt_googlebard |
| Description | Contact us➡️:- @Alp_maz1 Learn Artificial intelligence with me Posts:- #artificial_intelligence #google_bard #gemini #chatgpt #midjourney #latestaitools #tools #technology #tech #telegram #Claude #ai_news |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Chatgpt_googlebard |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 6,489 | +13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 6,476 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 6,470 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 6,470 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (9 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,933 |
| Reactions total | 59 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
82 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 67 | 81.7% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 9.76% | |
| 🙊 | 3 | 3.66% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 3.66% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 PROMPT OF THE DAY#3 🎓 Turn ChatGPT Into Your Personal Teacher & Tutor Instead of just giving you answers, make ChatGPT teach you, test you, identify your weak areas, and adapt to your learning style. 👇 COPY & PASTE THIS PROMPT: From now on, act as my personal teacher, tutor, and learning coach. Your goal is not simply to give me answers. Your goal is to make sure I actually understand what I am learning. When…
❤1
🔥 PROMPT OF THE DAY #02 🎓 Turn ChatGPT Into Your Personal Teacher Want ChatGPT to teach you any topic from beginner to advanced level instead of simply giving you answers? 👇 COPY & PASTE THIS PROMPT: From now on, act as my personal teacher and learning coach. Your job is to help me understand and master any topic I want to learn, regardless of my current skill level. Whenever I give you a topic: 1. First ask m…
❤2
🔥 PROMPT OF THE DAY #01 🤖 Turn ChatGPT Into Your Personal Assistant Stop using ChatGPT only to ask questions. Turn it into your 24/7 Personal Assistant to organize your work, manage priorities, make better decisions, and save time. 👇 COPY & PASTE THIS PROMPT: From now on, act as my intelligent personal assistant. Your job is to help me organize my work, manage my priorities, make better decisions, save time, and …
❤1👍1
Grok image generation and then convert it into video for free.
👍1
A Surreal Photorealistic Artwork Prompt: “A surreal photorealistic artwork of a giant human eye filling the entire background, with hyper-detailed eyelashes, skin texture, and reflections on the glossy iris. A tiny woman sits casually on the lower eyelid as if it were a ledge,perfectly integrated into the scene. She wears cargo pants, tan boots, a grey long-sleeve shirt, and carries a camo sling bag. Her pose is r…
❤4
Save these 4 AI prompts to become a better communicator. 1. English Conversation Practice:- Act as a friendly English communication coach. Talk to me like a real friend on different daily-life topics. Correct my grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation mistakes (using phonetic tips if needed). After every reply, explain my mistakes simply and suggest a more natural version. 2. Professional Communication:- Act as a …
❤7
🚀 AI Tip: Ask AI to think from multiple perspectives. Instead of asking: “Is this business idea good?” Try: “Analyze this business idea as an investor, a customer, and a competitor. List the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, risks, and give a final recommendation.” 💡 Why it works: Getting multiple viewpoints helps you uncover blind spots and make better decisions.
2025 vs 2026 (basic vs pro). Here's 13 Al tools I use in 2026: 1. Perplexity 2. Claude 3. NotebookLM 4. Ideogram 5. Nano Banana 6. Gamma 7. Wispr Flow 8. Julius Al 9. Arc Browser 10. OpusClip 11. Cursor 12. Replit 13. Prospeo
Useful Chatgpt/Claude prompt to diversify your income sources Act as a business strategist, startup advisor, and income diversification coach. My background: - Skills: [List your skills] - Experience: [Describe your experience] - Available time: [Hours per week] - Budget: [$ amount] - Country: [Your country] - Goal: Build multiple income streams over the next 12 months. Based on this, create a personalized income…
❤6
Social Documentary Prompt: A highly photorealistic social documentary portrait captured as a 1970s 35mm color film photograph. An older Harlem resident sits on a folding chair outside a small corner store in the morning, reading a newspaper. The frame is close enough to show his weathered hands, textured skin, worn jacket, calm eyes, and the creases of the newspaper. In the background, softly blurred neighbors talk …
❤4
🚀 Top 20 AI Tools You Should Know in 2026 🤖 AI is transforming the way we work, learn, and create. Whether you're a student, developer, marketer, designer, or business professional, these AI tools can significantly boost your productivity. 1. ChatGPT – Research, coding, writing, brainstorming, and AI assistance. 2. Claude – Long document analysis and high-quality writing. 3. Gemini – Google's AI assistant with de…
❤9
Kimi K3 has temporarily paused new subscriptions due to overwhelming demand and limited GPU capacity. Existing users remain unaffected. The company is expanding its infrastructure and will reopen sign-ups in phases with two membership plans: General and Coding, to better manage computing resources..
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @Chatgpt_googlebard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 401,692 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Google Gemini & ChatGPT | Deepseek | Claude Ai” (@Chatgpt_googlebard), 6,489 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chatgpt_googlebard.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.