Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Politique potentielle

Channel

Politique potentielle

@AffectvyIheEYtopotentialpolitics

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,066subscribers

+75 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001410799344
TypeChannel
Username@AffectvyIheEYtopotentialpolitics
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AffectvyIheEYtopotentialpolitics

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9911,0661,028.56 August 2026 — 991 subscribers6 August 2026 — 991 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,005 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,007 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,018 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,021 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,025 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,033 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,046 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,057 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,063 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,066 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 42 days, net +75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 980–1,077 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 01:211,066+3
13 Sept 2026, 05:591,063+6
9 Sept 2026, 03:411,057+11
3 Sept 2026, 12:391,046+13
31 Aug 2026, 03:251,033+8
28 Aug 2026, 05:281,025+4
24 Aug 2026, 18:581,021+3
20 Aug 2026, 17:131,018+11
17 Aug 2026, 18:081,007+2
15 Aug 2026, 00:071,005+14
6 Aug 2026, 13:19991no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:03991first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1733.3%
🔥917.6%
💅815.7%
👍611.8%
🤣611.8%
🥰59.80%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC7 viewsread 6 August 2026

Про картинки от ИИ, скажу прямо. Кубинская шпионка, которая в ВАКЛ получит репутацию Женщины-Макартура, а потом сбежит из этого сектантского ада для сериала вышла просто прекрасно.

6 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC36 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Так его делал Нарко Кубио. https://t.me/bbbreaking/235132

🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Али Лариджани, нахрена ты своего сына назвал в честь последнего шаха Ирана, когда ты такой весь рррреволюционер.

🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC48 viewsread 6 August 2026

Оцените имя у одного из наследников семьи Лариджани. https://t.me/infantmilitario/192965

6 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC56 viewsread 6 August 2026

Бен Хабиб - один из лидеров групп, которые хотят возобновления конфликта в Северной Ирландии. Именно поэтому сейчас и нужна группа справа, которые будут переманивать джингос с позиции «Конфликт в Северной Ирландии выгоден только мигрантам-олигархам, захватившим наше политическое поле». Джингос другого языка не понимают.

6 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC71 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Итак, пакистанский мигрант Бен Хабиб заявил, что он хочет вернуть Британию на три столетия назад. Забыл добавить, что с половиной. Но ставленник клана Зардари-Бхутто не будет озвучивать реальный план, куда хотят вернуть Британию его господа. https://t.me/SolovievLive/380108

🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC84 viewsread 6 August 2026

Нахрена трубить о секретной оперативной группе в американской прессе?

6 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC91 viewsread 6 August 2026

Это даже не смешно. Союз меча и орала.

6 Aug 2026, 00:27 UTC160 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Напоминаю, что в СССР школьникам разрешали читать «Священный вертеп» Лео Таксиля. Кто понял — тот понял.

🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC163 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Имейте в виду, что финансирование многих последних операций идёт через антикастровское лобби и Нарко Кубио. Особенно, вот этой https://t.me/SolovievLive/380017 Это уже заметили

💅3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AffectvyIheEYtopotentialpolitics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Politique potentielle” (@AffectvyIheEYtopotentialpolitics), 1,066 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AffectvyIheEYtopotentialpolitics.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.