Channel
@nofekran_crypto7761
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
40,531subscribers
-4,534 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001177645081 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nofekran_crypto7761 |
| Description | اینجا باید بایدددد دلار در بیاری💲 خدمات پولی نداریم اینجا همه چیز رایگانه🌱😘 تبلیغات پذیرفته میشود🤝 @Admiin_nofekran ای دی پشتیبانی 👈 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nofekran_crypto7761 |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:35 | 40,531 | -35 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:17 | 40,566 | -31 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 17:50 | 40,597 | -55 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:05 | 40,652 | -43 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:29 | 40,695 | -44 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:58 | 40,739 | -26 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:57 | 40,765 | -41 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:57 | 40,806 | -23 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:44 | 40,829 | -47 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:51 | 40,876 | -42 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:41 | 40,918 | -26 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:09 | 40,944 | -43 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:51 | 40,987 | -40 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:18 | 41,027 | -48 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:15 | 41,075 | -45 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 17:26 | 41,120 | -57 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:28 | 41,177 | -47 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 41,224 | -50 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:15 | 41,274 | -37 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:48 | 41,311 | first reading |
594 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 172 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 161 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 594 (5 August 2026 – 2 November 2026) |
| Views total | 914,790 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 00:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nofekran_crypto7761. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 594 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
اولین بونوس بنده بخاطر حجم 300هزار دلاری دیروزم دریافت شد الله برکت ✅ تذکر:حجم 300 هزار دلار یعنی فرضا من 100 دلار با اهرم 20 تو یک معامله درگیر کردم پس حجم اون معامله میشه 2000 دلار،نه اینک 300 هزار دلار تو یک معامله تتر گذاشته باشم
🔤 BZ نفتمون هم زد نفتش در اومد کامل کل مسیر طی شد✅ الله برکت 💵🌱
🎁 کمپین بونوس آبان ماه بیت یونیکس جبران ضرر 0️⃣5️⃣ درصدی فقط در بیت یونیکس 📍 تا 0️⃣0️⃣9️⃣دلار بونوس قابل ضرر برای هر کاربر📍 🗓️ مدت زمان کمپین: 10 تا 24 آبان نمونه این بونوس که 50% ضررتون از بونوس کم بشه بدون محدودیت ترید و رو هر ارزی بتونید ترید کنید رو هیچ صرافی یافت نمیشه❤️⭐ برای شرکت در رویداد از طریق لینک رفرال مجموعه نوفکران کریپتو اقدام بفرمایید✅ ⏺لینک ثبتنام https://www.bitunix.com/register?vipCode=nofek…
ی بونوس ناب داریم از صرافی بیتیونیکس میگیریم که این بونوس 50% ضرر هم کاور میکنه یعنی هر ضرر بکنید 50% ضرر از بونوس کم میشه نه پول اصلی شما مابقی صرافی ها نهایت 10% هست این بونوس رو امشب اوکی میکنم از دست ندین
چرا فک میکنی الان همه چی ارزونه؟ من میگم اینا شیشه میزنن میگی نه فقط پیشونی رو بنگر
🔤ESPORTS یا از همینجا میره که با شکست خط روند تایید مشیشه سلش یا میره بالا رو هانت میکنه ک در صورت هانت سلش تایید میشه
گلبارون شات سودهاتون الله برکت 💵🌱
🔤rune 11٪ اسپات😋 دقیق طبق مسیر ،الله برکت 💵🌱
🔤rune سیو و ریسک فری مجاز 💵🌱
🔤 BZ نفت در مسیر تحلیل✅
🔤rune حد ضرر بالای سقف قبلی
sl 6%
Showing the 12 most recent of 594 posts we hold for @nofekran_crypto7761. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@nofekran_crypto7761 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
@nofekran_crypto7761 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔥🐳nofekran_crypto🧿🌱” (@nofekran_crypto7761), 40,531 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nofekran_crypto7761.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.