Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ملاذي_Malazii ❤️

@black_mh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,407subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001173577305
TypeChannel
Username@black_mh
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/black_mh

Growth

4,4074,4104,408.59 Aug 2026, 19:16 — 4,410 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 03:31 — 4,407 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 19:1610 Aug 2026, 03:31
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,407–4,410 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 03:314,407-3
9 Aug 2026, 19:164,410first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.9%
avg views ÷ 4,407 subscribers
Avg views / post
877
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.815%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (17 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total17,549
Reactions total143
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

143 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13292.3%
🔥74.90%
💘42.80%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC156 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

‏أحب كُل ما يربطني بِكِ ، كل الصُدف التي أتَت بكِ إلى حياتي ❤

4

7 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC253 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

اتمنَى أن نبقى معًا للابُد وأن أحُبك بَهذا الشكُل البسّيط وإن تُحبني كذلكَ مهمَا تعثرنِا أَن يكَون حتِى ذلك الصمَت البغيض الذيّ بيننّا هوُ حِب أيضاً❤

5

6 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC345 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

لم أحبّك لحاجتي للحب ولم أحبّك لتسدي فراغات أيامي لم أحبّك لأنني وحيدة وأريد ظلاً أُستظلّ به.. بل أحببتك لأنك أنتَ لأنك المكان الآمن لأن الحوف معك يتلاشى كأنه لم يكن أحببتك بسجيتك و بعيوبك وندوبك حتى في اللحظات التي لم تُحبّ نفسك بها أحببتك كثيرا و رغبت بك كثيراً دون توقف..❤

3

5 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC437 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

أنتِ من مُمتلكاتي وأنا جَداً أناني❤

🔥7

5 Aug 2026, 00:32 UTC504 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

"صباحي أنتِ يا خيّر الصَباحات و أجملُها"❤

7

3 Aug 2026, 21:37 UTC595 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

حينَّ تَضحك تَتساقطُ النُصوُّص مِنْ ثَغركَ على هيئة سَكاكِر وحَلوى ❤️

9

3 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC638 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ما الذي وضعته داخلي حتى اصبح جميع الخلق لا يملؤون مكانك عندما تغيب🤍!

5

Signed 𝓨

2 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTC667 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

احبك وٰاعلمَ ان راحتيَ لا اجدها الا بقربك❤.

7

31 Jul 2026, 21:53 UTC835 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

انتِ الذي يليق بقلِبي وانتِ ملاذي من بين كُل الناس وانتِ كفايتي واكتفائي بهذه الدنيا أنتِ روحَي وانا من دونك بلا روُح ❤️ .

9

29 Jul 2026, 21:03 UTC949 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

لأنني أُحبٌ النوادر أخترتكَ❤!..

12

28 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC≈1,000 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

أُحِبُ أن أتَأملَ عَينَاك لِأنَها تَقول وتَتَحدث وتُعبِّر بِشكلٍ فَريدٍ جِداً.🥺❤

5

27 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC≈1,040 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

أحببت عيناك أولاً ثم أصبحت أحب كل شيء بك.❤

6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @black_mh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 963,004 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

كتابات شغف | passion | ᥫ᭡
@AS7RM · 159,810
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ملاذي_Malazii ❤️” (@black_mh), 4,407 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/black_mh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.